St. Marys county race for Sheriff

[Sweetie]

Originally posted by FIREMAN


I've known Steve for a while and I would be surprised if he had anything to do with it. But you can't never tell. It's a shame how St. Mary's Today goes after people.

:



clap:


DUMP the St. Mary's Today. He wouldn't know how to write the truth if it hit him in the face. I've never hated anyone, but he's an exception!!

[bad1032]

Sweetie,you have no clue as to why Mr zylak was removed from the detention center.He did his job there very well.As far as the other one he can not follow simple directions about removing his illegal signs,why would St Marys need someone like that to run an office:bandit:

[Blues Brother]

Originally posted by Sweetie




Yes, I have looked at Dave's website (as well as all the candidates websites) and it doesn't impress me at all. Have you looked at Toms? His administrative experience far surpasses Daves and the other candidates. If you think Dave is capable of running the Sheriff's Office, then ask why was he removed from the Detention Center after two year. If he can't manage a 5 million dollar facility, how can he possibily run the Sheriff's Office.

Sweetie

Well Sweetie, to each his own I guess. When I look at Tom's site I don't see Administrative experience, all I see is recruitment experience. There is a difference. Dave was transferred from the jail for strictly political reasons. Voorhaar needed to promote someone else and had to have a place to put him. Many people could see right through those politics, I'm surpised you missed it. If you've read all of Dave's site you would have seen the comments from Voorhaar and Doolan praising him for the good job he was doing. Dave did manage a $5 million budget and he did it very well.

[Sweetie]

Originally posted by Blues Brother


Well Sweetie, to each his own I guess. When I look at Tom's site I don't see Administrative experience, all I see is recruitment experience. There is a difference. Dave was transferred from the jail for strictly political reasons. Voorhaar needed to promote someone else and had to have a place to put him. Many people could see right through those politics, I'm surpised you missed it. If you've read all of Dave's site you would have seen the comments from Voorhaar and Doolan praising him for the good job he was doing. Dave did manage a $5 million budget and he did it very well.

Please Blues Brother politics had nothing to do with Dave being removed from the jail. Under his command the Detention Center had a rape and hanging. Or I guess you missed that. A commander/manager of such a facility should properly evaulate the people how are housed their.

Take a look at Tom's resume. it speaks for it self.
Sweetie

[Blues Brother]

Originally posted by Sweetie





Please Blues Brother politics had nothing to do with Dave being removed from the jail. Under his command the Detention Center had a rape and hanging. Or I guess you missed that. A commander/manager of such a facility should properly evaulate the people how are housed their.

Take a look at Tom's resume. it speaks for it self.
Sweetie

Maybe if the SHERIFF had been on better grounds with the Board of County Commissioners he could have gotten the necessary funding for the positions needed at the jail. A prison system is not an enjoyable place. With the proper staffing the rape may not have occurred, but then again it may have.

The Washington Post reported that there was no wrong doing on the part of the guards in the suicide and yes Zylak was in charge and he has never passed the buck on that issue to anyone. He was in charge and ultimately responsible for the jail, but look at your time line of events, sweetie. They don't jive with the incident and the transfer. Politics, politics, politics!!!!

[bad1032]

Sweetie.you just dont have a clue,what has Tom brain washed you.It is all politics,Zylak was removed so one of the boys could be put in there before a new sheriff takes over.Bailey was also dealt the same hand,he did the criminal justise class for the tech center his kids took first place 2 years and second one year.This year the student went to the nationals and took first place.If thats not political i dont know what is.As for your tom have you seen him at any function that means anything NO.At least with Zylak he has attended many functions that deal with the community.your man Tom is right there with what we have now and WE need a change and its not with him. Go ZYLAK

[chuckster]

Originally posted by FIREMAN


I've known Steve for a while and I would be surprised if he had anything to do with it. But you can't never tell. It's a shame how St. Mary's Today goes after people.

Fireman
blueeyes76
Sweetie

I guess that I am not surprised that the story is not being continued in this forum. Anyway the Headline of the Week is "Doolan says that he won't go down alone" A truck load of loot carted off to St Mary's City by THREE deputies using inmate labor!!
Also the loot has been listed as returned to EMA ,,, but who received it? Does the Head of Security for EMA have any answers?


Beleive me, there is/have been things going on that we have no idea about. We need a complete over-haul of our Sheriffs Dept. Time for some new eyes, some new blood, without any connections to the Good Ole Boys.

There will be more to this story before it's over ... probably with more deputies taking a fall

[Sweetie]

Originally posted by bad1032
Sweetie,you have no clue as to why Mr zylak was removed from the detention center.He did his job there very well.As far as the other one he can not follow simple directions about removing his illegal signs,why would St Marys need someone like that to run an office:bandit:

No, you don't have a clue. It will all come out eventually.

[chuckster]

Sweetie,,, wasn't he replaced by a deputy that can now be promoted to an officer? More politics.

Now I understand or should I say, "the word on the street" is that this same deputy some how received lumber for either a garage or deck that might have belonged to somebody else? Could this be some of the material that is missing from the Sheriffs Department? I wonder who delivered the lumber to his house?

This too will come out soon.

[Oz (Premo)]

Chuckster -

Should we be more concerned that $80,000 worth of stolen merchandise was stolen from the sheriff's office, or that now WE taxpayers will have to pay $80,000 to the thief who stole it because the States Attorney dropped the charges?

Should we feel sorry or make restitution because one thief stole from another thief? I say just give the first thief the address where the property was installed, and let him handle it.

And, if the States Atty wouldn't prosecute the original thief why should we think that the internal thieves will now be prosecuted? Is it fair to prosecute the second thief when you let the first thief off?

I guess posession really is 9/10th's of the law when one thief can reclaim siezed property that he stole, and our legal system will entertain this nonsense. Perhaps we taxpayers should only pay him for the property that he has his receipts for? If I bought $80 grand worth of stuff, I'd have receipts for most of it except for whatever I accidentally ran through the laundry,or lost.

Normally, I'm thankful that our legal system is technical and not moral, but in this case, there is clearly a right from wrong which is not technically correct in our legal system.