Southern Maryland Online - Serving Calvert, Charles, & St. Mary's Counties.  Click here to go to the Front Page of somd.com.
 
| Write Us | Help | Sponsors | Classifieds | Employment | Forums | MarketPlace | Calendar | Headlines | Announcements | Weather | More... |


Go Back   Southern Maryland Community Forums > General Interest > Elections

Elections Talk about the candidates and make predictions. Be sure to check our Elections Section.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 10-23-2009, 03:40 PM   #151
J.P. Cusick
 
VoteJP's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 2009
Location: Hollywood, MD. 20636
Posts: 3,036
Lightbulb The Child Support problem.

Quote:
Originally Posted by godsbutterfly View Post
I have overstepped nothing. We have the children with us and she is 2 minutes down the road. All she has to do is call the kids and they are available to her when she follows thru on what she says (unless they have a school activity or have plans with a friend) and she knows that. She walked out 4 years ago and left her children hurt and confused. Those are the facts.

Additionally I was referring to how hurt my own children were when their father ignored them so now try telling me I don't know about that situation either.
What I am saying is that it is a part of the job of having "custody" to see to it that the children honor, respect, communicate and visit with their separated parent(s).

If the step children fail in this to their Mom then it is your (the custodial) fault and it is your sin.

And if your own children fail in that to their separated father then you are at fault and you failed to provide the custody correctly and again it is a sin of your own.



__________________
SIGNATURE:
JP Cusick. - "Obnoxious when subtlety is not enough."
VoteJP is offline   [ Reply w/Quote ]
Old 10-23-2009, 03:54 PM   #152
Registered User
 
Member Since: Jun 2005
Posts: 68
Jpc

What if a child's father has dutifully paid child support for a few years but then decides to live with another woman and support her and her child instead of his own.

Retread is offline   [ Reply w/Quote ]
Old 10-23-2009, 04:16 PM   #153
You're a LOON :)
 
LusbyMom's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jul 2007
Posts: 5,898
Quote:
Originally Posted by Retread View Post
What if a child's father has dutifully paid child support for a few years but then decides to live with another woman and support her and her child instead of his own.

That cracks me up! Same situation here and he has even told the judge that he has stepkids to support and that's why he has no money.
__________________
Meet Me On The Stairs



LusbyMom is offline   [ Reply w/Quote ]
Old 10-23-2009, 04:26 PM   #154
You're a LOON :)
 
LusbyMom's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jul 2007
Posts: 5,898
Quote:
Originally Posted by VoteJP View Post
That is big talk except you are not going without anything.Really? And you know this how? Because I know that I don't do for myself so that I can give my children everything they need. It isn't cheap to raise a child. On top of the everyday expenses then you add in all the extras like sports and braces and clothes they outgrow constantly, the list is endless

In fact you expect your children's Dad to go without just to give your self some extra cash and car payments and you do not even need the Child support money but you demand it anyway.
I assure you he doesn't go without anything. He is all about himself and his new family. Extra cash? When you have kids their is no extra cash. Did you miss the part where I said I work MORE THAN FULLTIME. I support myself and my child 100%


And what the children really need is their parents in a marriage union and not Mommy pretending to be single and shirking her duties to her husband.
I don't pretend to be single you moron I am actually married. I am just not married to my child's father anymore. He is the one shirking his duties to my child.


I do believe you are an atheist because any moral system would denounce you.

And God is not some thing where we can deny it and it goes away.
You can't deny something that doesn't exist


Just like denying stealing and stolen money does not make it clean or right.

And surely you must be raising the children to be heathen Atheist too, because otherwise the kiddies will see Mommy for what Mommy does. Of course my own belief is that the children always see the truth whether the parents live or teach them the truth or not.
You are right children always see the truth and my child will know the truth and will always know who was the parent who was always there and who they could always depend on. My child will see who choose not to be around. Just because parents are divorced does not mean that they can't both parent.


So now are you teaching the children to get married or to just have babies?

And are you telling the boy to watch out for girls like his Mommy?

And are you telling the girl to find a rich baby-daddy?

Why would I teach them to just have babies? My children will be taught to take care of their own. Not shirk their responsibilities

Since being an Atheist you do not have to follow the old rules of right and wrong.
I don't need a bible to tell me what is right or what is wrong. It is right to take care of your child. PERIOD.


I can't wait to vote for your opponent :)
__________________
Meet Me On The Stairs



LusbyMom is offline   [ Reply w/Quote ]
Old 10-23-2009, 04:29 PM   #155
You're a LOON :)
 
LusbyMom's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jul 2007
Posts: 5,898
Quote:
Originally Posted by VoteJP View Post
What I am saying is that it is a part of the job of having "custody" to see to it that the children honor, respect, communicate and visit with their separated parent(s).

If the step children fail in this to their Mom then it is your (the custodial) fault and it is your sin.

And if your own children fail in that to their separated father then you are at fault and you failed to provide the custody correctly and again it is a sin of your own.



You are putting the responsibilty of visitation on the child and the CP??? What happens when you have a parent that could care less about picking up their kid and spending time with them? What happens when the NCP is wrapped up in their own life and doesn't want to be bothered with the kid? You can teach your child to respect their parent but you can't make their parent respect them.
__________________
Meet Me On The Stairs



LusbyMom is offline   [ Reply w/Quote ]
Old 10-23-2009, 05:14 PM   #156
Free to Fly
 
godsbutterfly's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2007
Posts: 2,413
Quote:
Originally Posted by LusbyMom View Post
You are putting the responsibilty of visitation on the child and the CP??? What happens when you have a parent that could care less about picking up their kid and spending time with them? What happens when the NCP is wrapped up in their own life and doesn't want to be bothered with the kid? You can teach your child to respect their parent but you can't make their parent respect them.
There is also much to be said for respecting the title but not how the person is acting! I would say JCP needs to worry about his own shortcomings and not those of others!
__________________
Life is fragile...handle it with prayer.
godsbutterfly is offline   [ Reply w/Quote ]
Old 10-23-2009, 07:22 PM   #157
J.P. Cusick
 
VoteJP's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 2009
Location: Hollywood, MD. 20636
Posts: 3,036
Lightbulb The Child Support problem.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Retread View Post
What if a child's father has dutifully paid child support for a few years but then decides to live with another woman and support her and her child instead of his own.

What that really means is the father has two wives.

And just because the law grants a legal divorce does not make it true.

The parents are still married and just pretending their not married based on our immoral laws.

The 2 parents are legally divorced but still morally married, and just living in lies.

And I would object to the father (or mother) paying the Child Support because it is morally wrong to pay a thief. Of course if the law is physically stealing the money as the Child Support system does then that is not willingly paying the thieves as that is just getting legally robbed.

So if the parent (Mom or Dad) goes live with another family then wherever they happen to be surely is their first and foremost duty.

And the other children already have everything they need to overflowing so there is no real demand or obligation to give them any more or any extras unless one wants to do so.


__________________
SIGNATURE:
JP Cusick. - "Obnoxious when subtlety is not enough."
VoteJP is offline   [ Reply w/Quote ]
Old 10-23-2009, 07:35 PM   #158
J.P. Cusick
 
VoteJP's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 2009
Location: Hollywood, MD. 20636
Posts: 3,036
Lightbulb The Child Support problem.

Quote:
Originally Posted by LusbyMom View Post
You are putting the responsibility of visitation on the child and the CP???
Yes, that is a part of the job of custody to give the children all that the children need and the biggest need of any child is to preserve their connection to their separated parent.

And I do know that most custodials fail in this regard and the sin belongs to those custodials.

Quote:
Originally Posted by LusbyMom View Post


What happens when you have a parent that could care less about picking up their kid and spending time with them? What happens when the NCP is wrapped up in their own life and doesn't want to be bothered with the kid?
That happens ONLY because of the uncooperative or incompetent custodials and it is always wrong to blame it on the separated parents.

That slander is just to falsely justify the custodial's wrongdoing.

The separated parents are not to be "bothered" by their own kids and that not-bothering is the job of the custodial. The custodial is to find the right way of making it work or else it is a failure of custody.

Quote:
Originally Posted by LusbyMom View Post


You can teach your child to respect their parent but you can't make their parent respect them.
The children must be taught to do far more than just respect their parents, and it is the job of custody to raise the children correctly.

And it was wrong to be giving the custody to parents that shirk the duties of the job.



__________________
SIGNATURE:
JP Cusick. - "Obnoxious when subtlety is not enough."
VoteJP is offline   [ Reply w/Quote ]
Old 10-23-2009, 07:58 PM   #159
You're a LOON :)
 
LusbyMom's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jul 2007
Posts: 5,898
Quote:
Originally Posted by VoteJP View Post
Yes, that is a part of the job of custody to give the children all that the children need and the biggest need of any child is to preserve their connection to their separated parent.

And I do know that most custodials fail in this regard and the sin belongs to those custodials.


That happens ONLY because of the uncooperative or incompetent custodials and it is always wrong to blame it on the separated parents.

That slander is just to falsely justify the custodial's wrongdoing.

The separated parents are not to be "bothered" by their own kids and that not-bothering is the job of the custodial. The custodial is to find the right way of making it work or else it is a failure of custody.


The children must be taught to do far more than just respect their parents, and it is the job of custody to raise the children correctly.

And it was wrong to be giving the custody to parents that shirk the duties of the job.





A NCP is busy... raising another family... partying... working or whatever and doesn't want to see their children and that is the CP's fault? I know alot of divorced couples.. and many of them can work together for their children. It is sad that not all parents can do that. But some parents just don't care enough. The end result is an innocent child is hurt by a worthless parent and no child deserves that. The ONLY person you can blame is the parent who has made no effort to be a part of their child's life. We are each responsible for our own actions.

You truly are insane and it really disgusts me that someone like you can even run for office.
__________________
Meet Me On The Stairs



LusbyMom is offline   [ Reply w/Quote ]
Old 10-23-2009, 08:38 PM   #160
Registered User
 
donbarzini's Avatar
 
Member Since: Aug 2003
Location: Waldorf
Posts: 3,856
You moronic piece of semi-human detritus(I'll wait while you look 'em up).......................got it? OK, here goes. I've finally figured out how I want you to die. We go to the Maryland Support Enforcement Unit. Find the 4 women who are owed the most money, give them each a Dodge Ram 1500 with a chain on the bumper. Then attach a chain to each one of your useless appendages. Then let 'er rip ladies!!!!! Then we immediately cauterize the wounds so you live. Then we tie a weight around your torso and dump you in the Bay with scuba gear so you can breathe while the crabs feast on what's left of you. If they're willing to eat something so full of sh!t
__________________
"90% of this game is half mental."-Yogi Berra

"I love mankind. It's people I can't stand"- Linus VanPelt
donbarzini is online now   [ Reply w/Quote ]
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:03 PM.

SEO by vBSEO 3.6.0 ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.