The Child Support injustice.

[padowne]

You are a deadbeat if you don't pay your child support. Mcdonalds is always hiring. Did you eat a good meal last night? Do you even care if your children ate? When you decided to have children you took on the resposibility of being a parent. Sorry to break it to you bud but that means supporting them financially. Perhaps if you didn't want to make sacrafices for them you should have kept it in your pants.

[smdavis65 (Premo)]

Originally Posted by LusbyMom

You gotta pay child support

I gotta pay child support.

Seriously, what is so hard about paying child support? It's your responsibility as a father. Dur...

[Pete (Premo)]

Of course all of you realize JPC has mental problems and you are wasting your time. Every post in reply to his lunacy is like throwing a starving dog a treat. (No insult intended to starving dogs)

He is a self centered leech on society. He will never change his stance that he is a victim.

[RoseRed (Premo)]

Originally Posted by Pete

Of course all of you realize JPC has mental problems and you are wasting your time. Every post in reply to his lunacy is like throwing a starving dog a treat. (No insult intended to starving dogs)

He is a self centered leech on society. He will never change his stance that he is a victim.

Did anyone ever ask him why he didn't take custody of his son so he wouldn't have to pay child support and would he have tried to collect it from his ex if he were able to succeed in that?

[toppick08 (Premo)]

Originally Posted by VoteJP

A significant point of injustice in the Child Support Laws is that when a parent is brought to Court for failure to pay the c/s then the question of do they plead "Guilty" or "Not Guilty" only means did they pay the child support or not?

If the Child Support was proved to have been paid then the parent becomes NOT GUILTY, and if the child support was not paid then the parents are GUILTY.

So in the c/s cases there really is no pleading of "guilty or not guilty" because if they do not have the cash paid then the parents are always GUILTY.

Therefore the parents can not give any defense as in explaining that they are dead-broke, or crippled injured, were Hospitalized or comatose, no explanations of being unemployed or laid off, had no money, none of that is acceptable and the Court Judge will tell any parent to shut-up that kind of defense because it is all inadmissible to the Court and the only ONLY question of guilt is did the parent pay or not?

The law is created that way so then the Court can NOT decide any account of justice or right from wrong and the parents are thereby denied the ability to give any honest defense and as such it is always an unjust procedure, and the penalty is either 3 years in State prison or 5 years in Federal prison just for failure to pay with no regard for the reasons or for the truth. And if the parent did have any assets or property or bank accounts then the law can and will pillage and plunder any assets available before the parents ever get to the Court, and in fact if any of the parents do raise the money and pay the Child Support then the parent will not go to jail and the Court proceedings will be terminated immediately upon payment because it is only concerned with taking the parents' money, and the Court serves as just an unreasonable collection tool for the single purpose of forcibly collecting cold cash.

And one might think that if the parent does pay the Child Support instead of going to jail that this proves they were "deadbeats" that were just holding out - but no. When faced with incarceration the parents will often sell their last possessions, or their own family members (the children's extended family) will very often pay the Child Support demands in order to stop their loved one from going to jail. It really is the same old process of the "Debtor's Prison" where the debtor's family would pay the debt to get their loved ones out of those prisons, so here again the children are compromised by stealing the family's money and calling it support of those same children when everyone concerned can see it is all a damned lie, because the paying parent really was dead-broke and it was their family that got legally robbed by the c/s system.

Sad story but very real indeed.

My daddy would so whip your ass.........

[Pete (Premo)]

Originally Posted by RoseRed

Did anyone ever ask him why he didn't take custody of his son so he wouldn't have to pay child support and would he have tried to collect it from his ex if he were able to succeed in that?

I am sure somewhere in the hundreds of posts arguing with him it has been asked. Go ahead though, I am sure his answers will be hilarious.

I suspect he had no choice . what judge is going to give custody to a delusional no load?

[RoseRed (Premo)]

Originally Posted by Pete

I am sure somewhere in the hundreds of posts arguing with him it has been asked. Go ahead though, I am sure his answers will be hilarious.

I suspect he had no choice . what judge is going to give custody to a delusional no load?

I'm not going to search for it. Let's just see if he replies to it here.

[Pete (Premo)]

Originally Posted by RoseRed

I'm not going to search for it. Let's just see if he replies to it here.

It was probably back when he said kids have small stomachs and don't need that much to eat and they are small so they can sleep on a couch.

[Bay_Kat (Premo)]

Originally Posted by Pete

It was probably back when he said kids have small stomachs and don't need that much to eat and they are small so they can sleep on a couch.

Somewhere around where he says teen pregnancy is fine and babies are a blessing to anyone. Bars should be open 24/7 and there should be 10 lottery drawings a night.

So basically, the people that would vote for him are drunks and deadbeat dads.

[RoseRed (Premo)]

Originally Posted by Pete

It was probably back when he said kids have small stomachs and don't need that much to eat and they are small so they can sleep on a couch.

Probably.