New Enterprise Campaign Ad.

[Chasey_Lane]

[quote=JPC, Sr.
Now I am going to beat him for less than a grand. Only in America.

-------------------------------- [/QUOTE]That grand you're spending is "extra" money and I don't think you should be spending it at all.

Originally Posted by residentofcre

I guess the way you plan to win is staying on this forum 24/7 and convincing people that you are the only candidate.... right?

I am so happy that I don't live in 29B

Becky Tice (R), welcome to the community Forum.

I guess it would be cool if I could convince people here that I am the best candidate and not the only candidate for the great 29B, but I find that most people on here are not from my area and this Forum will have very little if any affect on the election.

What I do is test my platform and some issues here. The posters here have already helped me in refining my campaign website and as the point of this thread is that I have a new Enterprise ad coming out (to 29B) this Wednesday and the contents of that ad was refined here on this forum. I even find the negative heckling to be very helpful, but I suspect that the posters have probably scared off many other candidates that can not take a little heat. Fortunately I can take heat just fine.

--------------------------

[itsbob (Premo)]

Originally Posted by JPC, Sr.

True it was not a charge against my son and I guess I am mistaken on this point. Back around 1983 (I had separated from my wife in 1981) and the police had a drug sting of about 20 people in the Hollywood, MD. area and my wife (we had not gotten a divorce then) was living with her new boyfriend in our house so the police sting assumed that the I was the suspect but it was not me. So they arrested her boyfriend (my ex did get the divorce and then married this guy) and so the false charge against my name was dismissed. I had forgotten about the incident but there it is. So I was wrong about this and so I guess I did have one narcotics charge against me even though it was a false charge.

So MMDad, you got me with this one and I here apologize for my error.

:BS:

[bresamil (Premo)]

Originally Posted by itsbob

:BS:

The police do not "assume" identity and "falsely charge" a name. If its on the books, they got an ID on the person. Without photo ID they are "John Doe" until some form of ID (photo, fingerprints, etc) is obtained.

[2ndAmendment (Premo)]

Originally Posted by bresamil

The police do not "assume" identity and "falsely charge" a name. If its on the books, they got an ID on the person. Without photo ID they are "John Doe" until some form of ID (photo, fingerprints, etc) is obtained.

JPC, Sr. is a liar and caught again. I suspect he was in a drug and alcohol induced state of semi conscientiousness most of the time and does not remember much of his life.

Originally Posted by bresamil

The police do not "assume" identity and "falsely charge" a name. If its on the books, they got an ID on the person. Without photo ID they are "John Doe" until some form of ID (photo, fingerprints, etc) is obtained.

In many ways I like it that you do blindly trust the police.

------------------------------

Originally Posted by Footballfreak

JPC

You laugh at the thought of a Repubican challenger. Be advised if the right Republican jumps into the race, its lights out for the Democratic nominee. The district is trending heavily Republican and the conservative Dems and Unaffiliated are not big fans of the tax first mentality of the incumbent.

Best wishes in the primary.

To me, when school classrooms burn down as in 29B and none of our political leaders call for relief then I do not care which Party the gutless dogs belong too.

-------------------------------

[bresamil (Premo)]

Originally Posted by JPC, Sr.

In many ways I like it that you do blindly trust the police.

------------------------------

Would you like me to scan in a page from the procedure manual? Or ask a few of the officers that frequent this board? Or ask them to pull up the PUBLIC file where a PICTURE would have been taken of the perpetrator at time of arrest, so that we could see who is telling the truth?

[Ponytail]

Originally Posted by bresamil

Would you like me to scan in a page from the procedure manual? Or ask a few of the officers that frequent this board? Or ask them to pull up the PUBLIC file where a PICTURE would have been taken of the perpetrator at time of arrest, so that we could see who is telling the truth?

Huh, 1.5 hours and still no response. He must still be researching his answer, and having some trouble with the bigger words in his thesaurus.

[RoseRed (Premo)]

Originally Posted by Ponytail

Huh, 1.5 hours and still no response. He must still be researching his answer, and having some trouble with the bigger words in his thesaurus.

The library closes at 8.