Jail/Prisons & Insanity.

Originally Posted by MMDad

Why do you pretend to care about percentages? This post shows that all you care about is freeing your fellow deadbeats from their obligations. The rest is just a smokescreen.

It only makes sense to let some one like me that has experienced the system to reform the system.

When alcoholics need real help then they go to AA because other alcoholics have the experience and the solutions. When the space shuttle exploded then the reform Board had other astronauts on that Board and others with first hand experiences because they are the ones that know best. I am the only one that will bring any real and helpful reform to child support because I do know the system best.

For me, I believe the old addage that justice must be given to those that rightly claim it, or else the day will come when those denied will take their claim without consent. IMO.

[bcp (Premo)]

It only makes sense to let some one like me that has experienced the system to reform the system.

In most responsible peoples minds, you have experienced the system from the wrong side,, not to be confused with the wronged side.

When alcoholics need real help then they go to AA because other alcoholics have the experience and the solutions.

And the long term desire for these people is to begin doing the right thing, not to change society to condone their drunkin and destructive ways.

When the space shuttle exploded then the reform Board had other astronauts on that Board and others with first hand experiences because they are the ones that know best.

If we used this anology, we would have to consider that the best people to reform the system would be those parents that are not recieving their support. not the parents that refuse to give the support.

I am the only one that will bring any real and helpful reform to child support because I do know the system best.

Again, you know the system from the wrong side, to really be able to justly reform laws that you feel are unjust in the instance, you would also have to have lived the side of the parent not receiving any support.

For me, I believe the old addage that justice must be given to those that rightly claim it, or else the day will come when those denied will take their claim without consent. IMO.

In many cases I have to agree that your statement here has merit, yet for the discussion at hand, I can not honestly in any way condone the nonpayment of child support for any child that you assisted in the production of.

you are just not seeing it from the right angle.

[Ken King (Premo)]

Originally Posted by JPC, Sr.

The law states, and the link proves it, that a Court under due process and Judicial Review can then exceed the 25% as stated in the first paragraph on the link, and the the Court can raise it to the 50% - 65% and that is the law in percentage and Maryland law does not do it.

You simply don’t get it and I doubt if you ever will.

You keep erroneously quoting what can happen should garnishment be needed to make a dead-beat comply and catch up with what the court has legally ordered for child support. What this Federal law does is allow for the arrearage to be recouped by accelerated garnishment. This law nowhere requires a state to only set child support amounts as a percentage of disposable income and I challenge you to show where it does.

It says that in the link under Federal law and here KK has it written too that the child support can only increase maximun to 65%, and that is percentage but the Courts only order fixed set amounts which is unjust and oppressive. I do not know how KK can quote percentages here in his post and then say it does not require percentages. It is a direct controdiction and I believe my own eyes and not controdictions from KK.

The only contradiction in all of this is that a slug like you is allowed in our society when you flagrantly refused to provide what your child was due; you should still be in jail working off your debt. The fact that you cannot grasp the difference between Maryland Child Support Guidelines and Federal Garnishment limits is of no shock as you have yet to show anything other then what it takes for you to continually prove that you are nothing more than an idiot.

Earlier I said that I didn’t think you held the abilities for any position other then an animal warden, I was wrong. You’re not even that bright and I firmly believe that you don’t even possess the requisite intelligence or ability to function as the Burger King fry-boy.

[Ken King (Premo)]

Originally Posted by JPC, Sr.

It only makes sense to let some one like me that has experienced the system to reform the system.

Failure to comply with the order and abusing the system is not experiencing it. You aren't suited to make a decision on what is required to support a child when parents become divorced because you blatantly disregarded the order and skipped town to avoid having to comply.

When alcoholics need real help then they go to AA because other alcoholics have the experience and the solutions. When the space shuttle exploded then the reform Board had other astronauts on that Board and others with first hand experiences because they are the ones that know best. I am the only one that will bring any real and helpful reform to child support because I do know the system best.

You are an idiot and have no clue as to what it costs to raise a child. You skipped out and refused to provide your share. Including you on a panel reviewing child support would be like placing a person on the shuttle review board whose only experience was that when they were a kid they wanted to be an astronaut.

For me, I believe the old addage that justice must be given to those that rightly claim it, or else the day will come when those denied will take their claim without consent. IMO.

And I believe that you should be tarred and feathered then ran out of town on a rail.

[MMDad (Premo)]

Originally Posted by Ken King

you blatantly disregarded the order and skipped town to avoid having to comply.

In JPC's defense, he didn't run away just to avoid the child support. There was that narcotics indictment, also.

[hvp05 (Premo)]

Originally Posted by bcp

And the long term desire for these people is to begin doing the right thing, not to change society to condone their drunkin and destructive ways.

If I could give you more green than I just did, I would.

What you just pointed out is what scares me when he talks about helping "protect" non-custodials and families. His idea of "protecting" is, in reality, more damaging and harmful than any rational individual could conceive. The system is probably not perfect now, but any alterations created by JPC would introduce chaos.

Fortunately, I can not fathom that he will ever be granted the power to alter anything outside his flamboyant website.

[hvp05 (Premo)]

Originally Posted by Ken King

Earlier I said that I didn’t think you held the abilities for any position other then an animal warden, I was wrong. You’re not even that bright and I firmly believe that you don’t even possess the requisite intelligence or ability to function as the Burger King fry-boy.

I have often wondered if JPC's perpetual unemployment is due more to him not seeking a job or to potential employers realizing that he's dysfunctional, stupid and not worth their time.

Originally Posted by Ken King

This law nowhere requires a state to only set child support amounts as a percentage of disposable income and I challenge you to show where it does.

I am trying my best to agree with KK but he just will not let me do it.

My point is; that is why I am running for election under the campaign platform of telling that I plan to, "Reform Maryland Child Support Law" so that law will start to conform with the Federal guidelines as it does not conform now.

KK is telling how it is and I am telling how it is going to be.

[hvp05 (Premo)]

Originally Posted by JPC, Sr.

I am trying my best to agree with KK but my low IQ just will not let me do it.

I corrected for what you meant... again. (You can thank me later.)

Originally Posted by JPC, Sr.

KK is telling how it is and I am telling how it is going to be.

You're not telling how it will be on this planet. But good luck finding the planet you seek.

[Ken King (Premo)]

Originally Posted by JPC, Sr.

I am trying my best to agree with KK but he just will not let me do it.

My point is; that is why I am running for election under the campaign platform of telling that I plan to, "Reform Maryland Child Support Law" so that law will start to conform with the Federal guidelines as it does not conform now.

KK is telling how it is and I am telling how it is going to be.

We can't agree because there are no Federal Child Support guidelines for the states to conform too. It is a function of the states and their right to determine what is required. That is what Maryland has done with their guidelines just as every other state in the union has done.

At one time Maryland did in fact have guidelines based on a simple percentage. It was 12.5% of the non-custodials gross earnings per child. I know, I was paying 25% of my gross to my ex-wife for support on our two children up until I was awarded custody.

The current system of shared responsibility is a hell of a lot more fair for the non-custodials then what the system used to be, though it appears more complex and therefore I am sure it is beyond your ability to comprehend. But if you are hung up on percentages I provided a text file as an attachment earlier that breaks each required amount down to a percentage with the minimum percentage being 10.4% of the combined income at the highest level of earnings for one child and the maximum being at about 44% for a modest income with 6 children.

If, as you claim, you want to reform the system then you should have some idea as to what the required percentage of income needing to be contributed for each child is, also you should have values for two children, three children and so forth. So what are these values since you claim to be the only experienced person who can speak to this matter?