Jail/Prisons & Insanity.

[harleygirl]

Originally Posted by JPC, Sr.

Give the last penny if the child needed it but not if there was no need.

JPC, it is so obvious that your whole entire reason for this campaign is because of the bitterness you felt over your divorce, and your feelings of non-control that you had over certain issues that affected you, like child support. You really need to get over these intense feelings of anger. You obviously gauge your self-worth on feelings of having control/power/no control. Honestly, you are at the library every day, please check out a book on divorce/letting go of anger/manic depression, or something similar. I know that you were tested for mental health issues at a state hospital, which I personally do not have much faith in. You really need some therapy with a private clinician.

Originally Posted by harleygirl

JPC, it is so obvious that your whole entire reason for this compaign is because of the bitterness you felt over your divorce, and your feelings of non-control that you had over certain issues that affected you, like child support.

It is some what true that my personal situation and events did and do affect my present agenda but my case is closed and my ex-wife is long deceased and I am recconciled with my son so reform of child support will only benefit others now and those that will come later. I sure do not want the mistreatment and injustices done to me to now be repeated against others.

I see it this way; as if I found a way off of the sinking ship (child support injusices) and so now I need to return and help others. Otherwise I would see myself as being as gutless as those that inflict the injustices against me and the others and that I do not accept. So if it is seen as some form of vendetta then it is still a vendetta for the better and not for vengeance.

Originally Posted by harleygirl

You really need to get over these intense feelings of anger. You obviously gauge your self-worth on feelings of having control/power/no control.

Well I have studied psychology extensively and anger has both positive and negative aspects. So I see seeking honest election to public office to right the wrong as a healthy expression of righteous anger. If one gets the news then many people do horrible things because of the injustices of custody and child support laws. I am the nice guy, and the day will come that if the nice guys fail then the others will fight and they will be much different then I.

Originally Posted by harleygirl

Honestly, you are at the library every day, please check out a book on divorce/letting go of anger/manic depression, or something similar.

Really I am very well read up on psychology in many many aspects and "letting go" is only a clever saying with out much substance to it. Letting go of some things yes, but letting go of what is right and needed is dead wrong.

Originally Posted by harleygirl

I know that you were tested for mental health issues at a state hospital, which I personally do not have much faith in. You really need some therapy with a private clinician.

The State Hospitals were horrible places that treated people like animals. Most have closed down but now the gov puts mental illness cases into jail and discards many into the depths of prisons. It is disgusting. But saying that I need therapy because I do not jump on your ban wagon is a pretty sad commentary. If you have something a little more substantial then I would love to see it.

[residentofcre]

Originally Posted by JPC, Sr.

When the child is living with the parent then the child is supported accordingly but when the child is taken away then some one else has taken that duty onto themselves.

Are you actually saying that you feel it is unjust for a parent to take the children and leave, then require the non-custodial parent to pay child support?

Is that what I am reading?

[itsbob (Premo)]

So how much money did you owe in back child support before it was "settled", and you make it sound like your ex-wife dying was a good thing as it ended the dispute for you.

You are such a disgrace to the male of the species.

[MMDad]

Originally Posted by itsbob

So how much money did you owe in back child support before it was "settled", and you make it sound like your ex-wife dying was a good thing as it ended the dispute for you.

You are such a disgrace to the male of the species.

He probably won't answer, or will be dishonest.

He owed $27,000 while his wife was dying. After she died, the court told him he had to pay the arears to the step-father (who actually raised his son). JPC tried to convince the court that since he was the only surviving biological parent, he should not have to pay. They didn't fall for it, so he quit work and started painting. That gave him shelter. The step-father got tired of persuing the worthless scum, and let it drop. That's when JPC stopped spray painting.

So, while he claims his painting was an act of defiance, in reality it was a way for him to get three hots and a cot without having to pay what he owed. If he really felt the painting was justified and effective, would he have stopped?

Originally Posted by residentofcre

Are you actually saying that you feel it is unjust for a parent to take the children and leave, then require the non-custodial parent to pay child support?

Is that what I am reading?

I really believe that the "requiring the child support" is the problem because those requirements are unjust and excessive and oppressive. In my observations the non custodial parents are to the point of desperate to keep a connection with the children but the law and the custodials only want child support and then to hell with the separated parent. All separated parents know they are getting dumped on.

If we look at the situation honestly then the parent with custody has got the prize of the union and the one with custody has won the divorce. The children are wonderful and they are blessing from God and then the Law and the custodials hold the children as captive claiming a ranson in child support from the separated parent just to see their kids twice a month. Most separated parents will not speak up or complain as I do because then they will be denied any visitation and they will be further unjustly degraded before
their children so the separated parents are forced even into silence because their children are being held captive.

The custodial gets all the benefits because the children are great but they wine and complain like we got to feed these kids and the children are a big burden. So if the child is a burden then give the child to the separated parent and let them support the children.

[Chasey_Lane]

Originally Posted by JPC, Sr.

So if the child is a burden then give the child to the separated parent and let them support the children.

It doesn't matter who the child is with - they still need to be supported.

[KCM]

Let me ask you something JPC. If you and your ex-wife did not divorce and you did not walk out on your son, would you have supported your son financially while he was in your custody? If yes, what is the difference of whether he is in your custody or not? You are still obligated to support that child. I don't see where your argument is. What I see is a deadbeat dad who is holding a grudge.

[KCM]

Originally Posted by Chasey_Lane

It doesn't matter who the child is with - they still need to be supported.

[Chasey_Lane]

Originally Posted by KCM

Let me ask you something JPC. If you and your ex-wife did not divorce and you did not walk out on your son, would you have supported your son financially while he was in your custody? If yes, what is the difference of whether he is in your custody or not? You are still obligated to support that child. I don't see where your argument is. What I see is a deadbeat dad who is holding a grudge.

I was wondering the same. What if his ex-wife would have died during labor forcing JPjackass to raise his son. Would he have filed for help from the state?