Wesley Clark is a bold face liar.

[AndyMarquisLIVE (Premo)]

Originally Posted by Nucklesack

You are an idiot, YOU complained that Bush was doing exactly that, in this same FRIGGIN THREAD. dont project your own fallacies onto us.

CAndy Pez Dispenser fits you well

Link

You lower your credibility when you resort to name-calling in every post you write.

[Toxick]

Originally Posted by AndyMarquisLIVE

Source: The Nexus of Politics and Terror[indent]Number One:

This one does not list the CODE RED in August in which so far 11 out of the 26 suspects have been released and charges have been dropped because of little or no evidence supporting the prosecution.

Very interesting list.


However, I see nothing which would lead me to believe that these were fabricated incidents which were concocted for the purposes of scare-mongering.

[Pete (Premo)]

Originally Posted by AndyMarquisLIVE

So you're sayuing after 9-11, you think the Democrats would go out and not defend this country.

What I am saying is that they cannot focus on security because they are quivering in fear someone might get "offended" and taking polls to see what they "could do" that everyone would be happy with. They have already SHOWED me by voting against the Patriot act., acting like the FBI just pillaged their porn collection about the wire tapping of incoming overseas calls, acting like Getmo is a concentration camp and calling for it's closure, and screaming "PROFILERS!" if your grandma isn't searched right along with the 27 year old Arab with shifty eyes. It is JUST PLAIN RETARDED!

Then they run around going; 9/11 report Airport security . Andy jusssssst how many mouth breathing retards making minimum wage does it take to stare at a x-ray screen before it becomes overkill?

Container ships Do you have any frigging idea how many containers come into this country everyday? To search every stinking one of them would require a 100,000 person Department of Container ship Inspection and then the Democrats would start screaming "BUDGET DEFFICIT!

If you have a strong offense and no defense, what are you going to do? Hope the other team doesn't have a good defense?

More retardation. We DO have a stinking defense. DOJ, DOD, DOHS all doing what they do really stinking well. Offense and defense. You cannot have a totally open society in a global economy without vulnerability, but you can do your best on both fronts. The Democrats have SHOWN their contempt for spending money on DOD. You were still pooping yellow when I was in the Navy during the draw down Clinton did so he could throw cash on social programs and brag about a budget surplus.

And once more instead of constructive posting, it's more idiotic personal attacks. Maybe you should become a politician.

You know you are a fool who reposts bullchit from the DU. you can barely string together a coherent thought and you contradict yourself endlessly. You really enjoy the freedom to whine and biatch and call Bush names and accuse him of every evil known to man based on regurgitated bullchit and unfounded theories, yet you curl into fetal position and pee on yourself when someone points out you are just plain stupid.

I will make a deal with you. I will stop calling you a mouth breathing retard the nano second you stop spewing like one.

I DO think Clinton did a poor job of defending this country. I think if Clinton had done more, you guys would be complaining that we're too concerned about security.

Bold face lie or you need to throw your crystal ball away because it sucks. Not a single American would have said crap about Clinton if after they attacked the WTC in 1994 if he would have implemented more security measures, improved the US intelligence community he had already gutted. Clinton was impeached, disbarred, a womanizer and adulterer and he GOT A DAMN PASS with an approval rating over 50%! How the hell do you figure any American would blast him for doing more for security? He wasn't interested in that. He wanted to scrimp on all the stuff that keeps us safe and go "Look at the budget surplus!" "Look at me! Look at me!"

There has not been another 9-11 and I applaud that. But to break up a terrorist threat more than a month ago and then exploit it two months later labeling "credible evidence" and "imminent terrorist attack" and saying that we will be attacked soon to scare people into supporting this President is just wrong.

Saying ANYTHING to you that would get you off your George Bush is a bad man and he even touched me where my swim suit covers" kick is futile.

Andy WTF is your definition of "credible evidence"? Please tell me. Do you deem it credible AFTER the attack happens? Do you have a formula? Is it mathematical or some type of algorithm? Perhaps it is a judgement call eh? You need to grow the eff up and stop this conspiracy bullchit because it makes you look even more retarded than you possibly are.

I have said before I don't think some Democrats are strong enough on defense. I don't like Nancy Pelosi and Hillary Clinton and Ted Kennedy because if Hillary was President, we'd be defending this country with spitballs.

Finally!

I am just open to the idea of having a Democratic majority with a Republican president. IF a Democrat becomes President, I'd want a Republican congress.

Either/or it is all crap if the minority party is hell bent on being obstructionist. Point to a Republican who is as vitriolic as Schummer, Pelosi, Reid, Kerry, Kennedy. They just hate, their minions just hate. they have no stinking plan they want to put out there because if they did they would get slapped down like your prom date did to you.

[Kerad (Premo)]

Looks like somebody had one too many bowls of Cheneyos this morning. You've been noticeably more "ranty" these last couple days....something wrong?

[Pete (Premo)]

Originally Posted by Kerad

Looks like somebody had one too many bowls of Cheneyos this morning. You've been noticeably more "ranty" these last couple days....something wrong?

Stupid people bother me

[AndyMarquisLIVE (Premo)]

Originally Posted by Pete

they have no stinking plan they want to put out there because if they did they would get slapped down like your prom date did to you.

Once more, "Conservatives" relish in hurling insults. There's no point in responding.

In the Code Red Terror Threat, Britain wanted to pursue more evidence before arresting these individuals, fearing they could get off and rejoin with terrorist leaders. George Bush, however, wanted an arrest made now. And if these are indeed terrorists, they're plotting again with al-Qaida.

Originally Posted by Pete

Stupid people bother me

Just more of the same. You continue to prove me right about you neocons in general. And that's what most of this post is.

Originally Posted by Pete

Not a single American would have said crap about Clinton if after they attacked the WTC in 1994 if he would have implemented more security measures, improved the US intelligence community he had already gutted.

You say that now but when Clinton did do something in Afghanistan, it was people like you who still say it was a diversion tactic.

You just hate people who oppose your political ideas and label them as idiotic, retarded, stupid, etc.

It's the same obtuse shorthand of bullying and another word starting with bull that the Republicans continue to do.

And I guess you think torturing terror suspects and not giving them access to an attorney is justified too?

[AndyMarquisLIVE (Premo)]

Originally Posted by Kerad

Looks like somebody had one too many bowls of Cheneyos this morning. You've been noticeably more "ranty" these last couple days....something wrong?

He's desperate

[Nucklesack]

Originally Posted by AndyMarquisLIVE

You say that now but when Clinton did do something in Afghanistan, it was people like you who still say it was a diversion tactic.

When Clinton bombed Iraq who was the ones yelling Wag the Dog? Since you have established yourself as a Drive By Poster, links will be neccessary (let me know if you need them)

[Pete (Premo)]

Originally Posted by AndyMarquisLIVE

You say that now but when Clinton did do something in Afghanistan, it was people like you who still say it was a diversion tactic.

Thank you! Using your logic; Since Clinton did go half assed into Afghanistan he caused terrorism to be worse and caused 9/11? He should have let them be and they would not have bothered us right? OR because he went in half assed and didn't "stay the course" and finish the job completely before stopping he allowed 9/11?

Do you still think that leaving Iraq before it is stable and in control of it's own destiny is a good move? Remember Afghanistan now....half assed effort gets you half assed results.

P.S. I never criticized Clinton for lobbing a few Tomahawks into Afghanistan.

You just hate people who oppose your political ideas and label them as idiotic, retarded, stupid, etc.

Not true at all. If you would post anything coherent that was not regurgitated, made up, conspiracy theory, Bush hater, bullcrap it would be different.

It's the same obtuse shorthand of bullying and another word starting with bull that the Republicans continue to do.

You are well versed in the art of victim hood already. So cute

And I guess you think torturing terror suspects and not giving them access to an attorney is justified too?

Define "torture". Never mind I am sure our definitions are staggeringly different. I will be interested to hear your song when you grow up and have kids.