Southern Maryland Online - Serving Calvert, Charles, & St. Mary's Counties.  Click here to go to the Front Page of somd.com.
 
| Write Us | Help | Sponsors | Classifieds | Employment | Forums | MarketPlace | Calendar | Headlines | Announcements | Weather | More... |


Go Back   Southern Maryland Community Forums > Sports, Recreation & Entertainment > Hobbies and Personal Interests

Hobbies and Personal Interests Talk about anything from Scrapbooking to Photography, Model Trains to HAM radio. subForums for: Scrapbooking, Photography, and Video and Online Gaming.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 12-31-2008, 01:04 PM   #1
Strung Out
 
Larry Gude's Avatar
 
Member Since: Feb 2001
Posts: 63,277
Aerodynamics question...

OK, it's 1700 mikes from BWI to ABQ. It took 4 hours 20 minutes from take off to touchdown to get there, an average ground speed of about 400 mph on a plane designed to fly, what 600? The pilot told us we had a 120mph head wind, so, does that make air speed 520 or so?

And on the way back it took 3 hours flat, or 570 mph ground speed.

Now, does all that sound right, am I using correct terms and facts, ground speed, air speed, commercial aircraft speed limits, and is it a simple aerodynamic fact that the plane can't cover 570 mph ground speed with a head wind of 120 or do they not go faster because it is too inefficient?

Thanks in advance.
__________________
"...When law and morality contradict each other, the citizen has the cruel alternative of either losing his moral sense or losing his respect for the law. These two evils are of equal consequence, and it would be difficult for a person to choose between them."

Frédéric Bastiat
Larry Gude is offline   [ Reply w/Quote ]
Old 12-31-2008, 01:13 PM   #2
Give Peas a Chance
 
Bustem' Down's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2004
Location: Dahlgren, VA
Posts: 6,836
Quote:
Originally Posted by Larry Gude View Post
OK, it's 1700 mikes from BWI to ABQ. It took 4 hours 20 minutes from take off to touchdown to get there, an average ground speed of about 400 mph on a plane designed to fly, what 600? The pilot told us we had a 120mph head wind, so, does that make air speed 520 or so?

And on the way back it took 3 hours flat, or 570 mph ground speed.

Now, does all that sound right, am I using correct terms and facts, ground speed, air speed, commercial aircraft speed limits, and is it a simple aerodynamic fact that the plane can't cover 570 mph ground speed with a head wind of 120 or do they not go faster because it is too inefficient?

Thanks in advance.
What kind of plane?
Bustem' Down is offline   [ Reply w/Quote ]
Old 12-31-2008, 01:18 PM   #3
Give Peas a Chance
 
Bustem' Down's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2004
Location: Dahlgren, VA
Posts: 6,836
Boeing 737, 767and McDonnell Douglas MD-80 all have cruising speeds under 550 mph.
Bustem' Down is offline   [ Reply w/Quote ]
Old 12-31-2008, 01:53 PM   #4
Registered User
 
MMDad's Avatar
 
Member Since: Aug 2005
Posts: 21,922
Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows CE; IEMobile 7.7) 320x240; VZW; Motorola-Q9c; Windows Mobile 6.0 Standard)

Due to lower air pressure at altitude, indicated airspeed is far lower than true airspeed. For example, an indicated airspeed of 350 at 40K feet is roughly equivelant to 630 knots. That's why you cruise at high altitude - the lower pressure means you can travel at speeds that would be supersonic at lower altitudes.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by GURPS View Post
It is CALLED Spell Check US IT or be seen as ignorant
Quote:
Originally Posted by ItalianScallion View Post
Thanks for calling what we do here: "hate".
MMDad is offline   [ Reply w/Quote ]
Old 12-31-2008, 01:53 PM   #5
.
 
huntr1's Avatar
 
Member Since: Mar 2003
Posts: 12,819
headwind = slows them down
tailwind = speeds them up

best I can do for ya.
huntr1 is offline   [ Reply w/Quote ]
Old 12-31-2008, 02:43 PM   #6
Strung Out
 
Larry Gude's Avatar
 
Member Since: Feb 2001
Posts: 63,277
...

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bustem' Down View Post
What kind of plane?
...SR71 or a 737. One or the other. I can't quite remember...


__________________
"...When law and morality contradict each other, the citizen has the cruel alternative of either losing his moral sense or losing his respect for the law. These two evils are of equal consequence, and it would be difficult for a person to choose between them."

Frédéric Bastiat
Larry Gude is offline   [ Reply w/Quote ]
Old 12-31-2008, 02:45 PM   #7
Strung Out
 
Larry Gude's Avatar
 
Member Since: Feb 2001
Posts: 63,277
...

Quote:
Originally Posted by MMDad View Post
Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows CE; IEMobile 7.7) 320x240; VZW; Motorola-Q9c; Windows Mobile 6.0 Standard)

Due to lower air pressure at altitude, indicated airspeed is far lower than true airspeed. For example, an indicated airspeed of 350 at 40K feet is roughly equivelant to 630 knots. That's why you cruise at high altitude - the lower pressure means you can travel at speeds that would be supersonic at lower altitudes.
...Ok, obviously, I didn't have a clue of the indicated airspeed, so, I mean, I'm just working off of miles from A to B and time. What you're saying here is 350 indicated is covering 630 in terms of actual distance from A to B?
__________________
"...When law and morality contradict each other, the citizen has the cruel alternative of either losing his moral sense or losing his respect for the law. These two evils are of equal consequence, and it would be difficult for a person to choose between them."

Frédéric Bastiat
Larry Gude is offline   [ Reply w/Quote ]
Old 12-31-2008, 02:47 PM   #8
Strung Out
 
Larry Gude's Avatar
 
Member Since: Feb 2001
Posts: 63,277
...

Quote:
Originally Posted by huntr1 View Post
headwind = slows them down
tailwind = speeds them up

best I can do for ya.
...I knew that part. I'm just finding myself curious if they Can't go any faster in terms of how much ground they are covering into a head wind due to the fact that 400 mph forward into a 120 mph head wind is the equivalent of the plane flying, going through the air at 520 and that they just can't go any faster which seems obvious the more I think about it...

__________________
"...When law and morality contradict each other, the citizen has the cruel alternative of either losing his moral sense or losing his respect for the law. These two evils are of equal consequence, and it would be difficult for a person to choose between them."

Frédéric Bastiat
Larry Gude is offline   [ Reply w/Quote ]
Old 12-31-2008, 03:23 PM   #9
Registered User
 
Gwydion's Avatar
 
Member Since: Nov 2006
Location: Annapolis
Posts: 2,736
Better question is what happens when you put a plane on a treadmill.

Gwydion is offline   [ Reply w/Quote ]
Old 12-31-2008, 03:39 PM   #10
Repete
 
Pete's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jan 2003
Location: Hollywood
Posts: 50,905
Quote:
Originally Posted by Larry Gude View Post
OK, it's 1700 mikes from BWI to ABQ. It took 4 hours 20 minutes from take off to touchdown to get there, an average ground speed of about 400 mph on a plane designed to fly, what 600? The pilot told us we had a 120mph head wind, so, does that make air speed 520 or so?

And on the way back it took 3 hours flat, or 570 mph ground speed.

Now, does all that sound right, am I using correct terms and facts, ground speed, air speed, commercial aircraft speed limits, and is it a simple aerodynamic fact that the plane can't cover 570 mph ground speed with a head wind of 120 or do they not go faster because it is too inefficient?

Thanks in advance.
The airframe of the plane is load limited to a particular airspeed. It is not so much the engine that limits speed in the air it is the max speed the airframe is rated to before the wings peel off. To an airplane groundspeed means nothing, airspeed (IAS)means everything. I don't think a 737 can hit 600 IAS more than likely it is just over 500 IAS and that is full throttle. Cruising at max speed all the time would be inefficient. The engines and airframe are engineered for a modest airspeed capability with reasonable fuel efficiency.

So on your trip you were probably flying at 520 IAS, factoring in the headwind going west of 120 your groundspeed was 400.

Coming back you had a groundspeed of 570 MPH but because of a tailwind coming east the IAS was under 500 mph. The tailwind got you more giddyup and saved them a bunch of fuel.
Pete is offline   [ Reply w/Quote ]
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:35 PM.

SEO by vBSEO 3.6.0 ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.