Recent content by sleuth

:howdy:

I don't know about all that cookin' thing, but if he makes you a spice rack out of baby food jars, I think he's a keeper.

We've upgraded. :smile:

I am considering the following cameras for my wife: Nikon D3100 or D3000 Canon Powershot G12 Canon EOS Rebel T3 or XS I'm basically trying to get my wife her first "professional-grade" camera. I realize these aren't top of the line but they seem like good models to learn on and practice...

I like the new orange or pumpkin colored cars and trucks. Whatever you want to call it, it looks sharp.

We have a Blockbuster BlueBox at a local Speedway here in Indy. $1.00 DVD rentals. I tried it once when Redbox didn't have what I wanted, but it couldn't read my debit card. :ohwell:

You would think a known enemy of the state would not be allowed to legally enter the country except to negotiate terms of surrender. :shrug:

I talk to God daily, and know hundreds and maybe even thousands of others that do. I also work with a guy here who may be approaching that 60,000 year mark. :lmao:

You can review Answers in Genesis - Creation, Evolution, Christian Apologetics if you wish to review what other radiometric dating methods they explore.

:shrug: If you say so. But the scientific method is man's creation. Man has been proven imperfect. I think it arrogant and foolish to assume that the scientific method is perfect. Is it useful? Yeah. Is it perfect?

From the Answers in Genesis organization website: "We know that radioisotope dating does not always work because we can test it on rocks of known age. In 1997, a team of eight research scientists known as the RATE group (Radioisotopes and the Age of The Earth) set out to investigate the...

I recently sliced my cable plan down to the most basic, upgraded the internet speed by one tier, and got Netflix for $9 a month. So now I get local channels, 80% of my favorite shows through my Wii/Netflix subscription, hundreds of movies on demand, hundreds of kids television shows on...

:thewave:

I am a man of science in that I use scientific models based on measured observation to predict future results - it's called engineering. I respect the scientific method for the purposes of creating simulations and models. But the scientific method can produce erroneous simulations and models...

As a man of science and faith myself, I still don't see where the proof is. All I see is circumstantial evidence predicated upon the theories and ideas and assumptions of man. Carbon-14 dating seems to me to be the closest thing we have to proof of a millions-of-years old Earth, but even that...