Four soldiers killed in Iraq, toll near 4000

[forestal]

Enjoy your dinner. They're paying the price of your indifference.

Four U.S. troops killed in Iraq - Los Angeles Times

Four U.S. troops killed in Iraq

The death toll nears 4,000 as a roadside bomb kills 3 today while indirect fire claimed a soldier on Friday.
By Ned Parker and Hameed Rasheed, Special to The Times
12:39 PM PDT, March 22, 2008
BAGHDAD -- - The number of U.S. troops killed in Iraq edged closer to the milestone figure of 4,000 dead today as a roadside bomb claimed the lives of three soldiers.

The bomb blew up the U.S. soldiers' vehicle and killed two Iraqis in northwestern Baghdad, the military said in a press release. The military also reported that indirect fire, either a rocket or mortar, killed a U.S. soldier and wounded four others south of Baghdad on Friday.

[Baja28]

Three U.S. soldiers die in Iraq, toll nears 4,000

Would you stop kissing & fondling your brother long enough to make sure you two aren't posting the same crap?

[MMDad]

Originally Posted by forestal

Enjoy your freedom of speech. They're paying the price of your indifference.

Hey Forest, when are you going to stop celbrating their deaths and start thanking them for allowing you to spew drivel?

[nhboy (Premo)]

Originally Posted by Baja28

Three U.S. soldiers die in Iraq, toll nears 4,000

Would you stop kissing & fondling your brother long enough to make sure you two aren't posting the same crap?

If I've ever referred to you as a simpleton. I was wrong. You haven't risen to that level yet. Maybe someday.....

[lbreder]

You are a moron forestal. You assume we (the average person) does not give a damn about another soldier who dies to protect our freedoms. With your very words, you are admitting the war in Iraq is protecting those freedoms which you have. How dare you group society at large into a group who cares not one bit about those soldiers deaths. I have known and watched soldiers die and dont you think for one second I don't remember them every day of this life i am blessed to retain.

[forestal]

The war in Iraq is protecting our freedom? Really?

Who in Iraq is threating our freedom?

Maybe it's those WMD's we've never been able to find.


The war in Iraq is protecting Halliburton's, KBR's, and Blackwater's bottom line. That's about it.

Originally Posted by lbreder

You are a moron forestal. You assume we (the average person) does not give a damn about another soldier who dies to protect our freedoms. With your very words, you are admitting the war in Iraq is protecting those freedoms which you have. How dare you group society at large into a group who cares not one bit about those soldiers deaths. I have known and watched soldiers die and dont you think for one second I don't remember them every day of this life i am blessed to retain.

[lbreder]

Judging from the filth you post on a consistant basis check this out from the Clinton News Network:

White House: Bin Laden wanted Iraq as a new base - CNN.com

How about this:
Osama bin Laden: Iraq is a 'Perfect Base'

Or this:
Purported bin Laden message: Iraq is 'perfect base' (Democrats, RETREAT!!!)

this might be of interest:
In Iraq, a clear-cut bin Laden-Zarqawi alliance | csmonitor.com

There are numerous other facts which can't be discussed here due to information that can't be consumed by the general public. Just in case yo uare thinking it's a vast right wing coverup to not release CLASSIFIED information to YOU, it's against the law to not reveal information in order to "cover up" information. Here is the Executive order (EO 13292) prohibiting the "covering up" of classified information:
Bush Executive Order 13292 on Classified National Security Information

Here is the USC for disclosure of classified information:
US CODE: Title 18,798. Disclosure of classified information

Oh yeah, a little document (Executive order 12949) signed by Bubba Clinton authorizes wire taps (FISA) without court orders. I have put a link in her for you to educate yourself:
Executive Order 12949

Yes, the administration might have been wrong about WMDs but that still does not excuse some whacko that wants to use Iraq as a base to launch further attacks on us. Should we stand by and let OBL attempt to destroy Isreal?

Let me know if you want anymore Intel from our "enemy" as to what they plan to do...

[forestal]

Oh, so essentially what you're saying is that George Bush's foolish war has made Iraq the base Al Qaeda is looking for. There was no Al Qaeda in Iraq before we went in.

Great job you and your Republican ilk are doing, creating these self fulfilling prophesies that require our soldiers to risk their lives.

The guard, army, and marines have never been at a worse state of readiness than they are now. That's what you get with Republicans running the show.

Vote for Insane McCain and you'll get a needless war with Iran, and a continuation of the destruction of our military, their families, our freedome, our economy, and our future.

Originally Posted by lbreder

Judging from the filth you post on a consistant basis check this out from the Clinton News Network:

White House: Bin Laden wanted Iraq as a new base - CNN.com

How about this:
Osama bin Laden: Iraq is a 'Perfect Base'

Or this:
Purported bin Laden message: Iraq is 'perfect base' (Democrats, RETREAT!!!)

this might be of interest:
In Iraq, a clear-cut bin Laden-Zarqawi alliance | csmonitor.com

There are numerous other facts which can't be discussed here due to information that can't be consumed by the general public. Just in case yo uare thinking it's a vast right wing coverup to not release CLASSIFIED information to YOU, it's against the law to not reveal information in order to "cover up" information. Here is the Executive order (EO 13292) prohibiting the "covering up" of classified information:
Bush Executive Order 13292 on Classified National Security Information

Here is the USC for disclosure of classified information:
US CODE: Title 18,798. Disclosure of classified information

Oh yeah, a little document (Executive order 12949) signed by Bubba Clinton authorizes wire taps (FISA) without court orders. I have put a link in her for you to educate yourself:
Executive Order 12949

Yes, the administration might have been wrong about WMDs but that still does not excuse some whacko that wants to use Iraq as a base to launch further attacks on us. Should we stand by and let OBL attempt to destroy Isreal?

Let me know if you want anymore Intel from our "enemy" as to what they plan to do...

[forestal]

Inbreader, I don't have the time to expose all your lies, but here's one for you: Clinton didn't sign any laws bypassing FISA... I think the rest folks here can look at this lie of yours and correlate its veracity with the rest of your spew...

Think Progress » Blog Archive » Misinformation On Spying Doesn’t Take A Holiday

Levin is referring to Clinton’s 2/9/95 executive order and his claim is totally false. First, FISA didn’t cover physical searches at the time, so the executive order did not, and could not, “bypass FISA.” Second, unlike the secret Bush administration program, Clinton’s public executive order did not apply to U.S. persons. If Bush’s program didn’t apply to U.S. persons there would be no controversy at all.
But Levin doesn’t have to read Think Progress to figure this out. He can read his own right-wing magazine. Here’s the National Review’s Byron York five days ago:

In the argument that has emerged over warrantless surveillance, there have been a number of overstatements. Some people, for example, have said that Bill Clinton signed an executive order authorizing such surveillance; he did not.

One clarification: when someone says something that’s not true, it’s not an overstatement, it’s a lie.

Originally Posted by lbreder

Oh yeah, a little document (Executive order 12949) signed by Bubba Clinton authorizes wire taps (FISA) without court orders. I have put a link in her for you to educate yourself:
Executive Order 12949

Yes, the administration might have been wrong about WMDs but that still does not excuse some whacko that wants to use Iraq as a base to launch further attacks on us. Should we stand by and let OBL attempt to destroy Isreal?

Let me know if you want anymore Intel from our "enemy" as to what they plan to do...

[lbreder]

Originally Posted by forestal

Oh, so essentially what you're saying is that George Bush's foolish war has made Iraq the base Al Qaeda is looking for. There was no Al Qaeda in Iraq before we went in.

Great job you and your Republican ilk are doing, creating these self fulfilling prophesies that require our soldiers to risk their lives.

The guard, army, and marines have never been at a worse state of readiness than they are now. That's what you get with Republicans running the show.

Vote for Insane McCain and you'll get a needless war with Iran, and a continuation of the destruction of our military, their families, our freedome, our economy, and our future.

So you have unequivocal data to prove Al Qeada was not in Iraq before the invasion? They were not there in the 90s when your hero was in the office banging interns? You are some sort of military expert to claim the military is in a worse state of readiness? Needless war with Iran? Since you claim to be an expert in such arenas as military readiness, politics, et al, what stratigic impact would Iran attacking Isreal be for the United States? I don't subscribe to your wrong wing theory of we created our own enemy.