Stupid Principal

[sommpd]

Originally Posted by KillJoy

Sure, it might not be OK, but this is how I think about it:

-If it is the teachers idea to get with this girl, and the girl does not consent, he should be charged with rape of the girl.

-If the girl were to come to the teacher and say "hey lets get down and do the nasty" and they go forward with it, the principal should not be charged with rape. It's her idea.

Where do you cut this off? Don't you see the responsibility of the teacher? Don't you see how easy it would be for a teacher to manipulate a student into coming on to him/her?

[KillJoy]

Originally Posted by sommpd

Where do you cut this off? Don't you see the responsibility of the teacher? Don't you see how easy it would be for a teacher to manipulate a student into coming on to him/her?

They can manipulate all they want, but having the student make one short phone call to the local PD will have it solved.

[sommpd]

Originally Posted by KillJoy

They can manipulate all they want, but having the student make one short phone call to the local PD will have it solved.

But if the student believes they have fallen for the teacher, then the phone call isn't going to happen until it is too late and innocence is lost. There are some girls who are still innocent in highschool. Unfortunately, I see too many of these girls who have been taken advantage of by someone older, wiser and in a position of authority. Having sex with someone who is responsible for you can have greater ramifications then having sex with a peer!

[MMDad (Premo)]

Originally Posted by sommpd

Where do you cut this off? Don't you see the responsibility of the teacher? Don't you see how easy it would be for a teacher to manipulate a student into coming on to him/her?

Fortunately, there are laws that tell us where to cut it off. We don't have to let retards like "Imnomensa" and "killjoy" decide that a 17 year old deserves to be preyed upon by her principal.

It amazes me that these stupid, sick effers think it is acceptable for a principal to be doinking a girl he is trusted to safeguard and protect. It is even worse that they accuse her of being some sort of slut that seduced the principal.

[sommpd]

Originally Posted by MMDad

Fortunately, there are laws that tell us where to cut it off. We don't have to let retards like "Imnomensa" and "killjoy" decide that a 17 year old deserves to be preyed upon by her principal.

It amazes me that these stupid, sick effers think it is acceptable for a principal to be doinking a girl he is trusted to safeguard and protect. It is even worse that they accuse her of being some sort of slut that seduced the principal.

I can tell you now, that the police don't go out looking for the teacher and seventeen year old getting together. Usually this case comes up because the seventeen (and normally it is younger than that) feels they have been a victim. They start out in these "consensual" relationships, then realized they have been used.

Now, you will say that could happen with their peers. The difference is they don't have that sense of trust, and don't have it put into their brain that they are required to listen and trust their peers as they are authority figures.