Car Breathalyzers For Everyone

[ylexot (Premo)]

Originally Posted by tommyjones

so you would drive drunk to be rebellious?

No, I would bypass the interlock to be rebellious.

Originally Posted by tommyjones

the only reason anyone would have to bypass the devices would be so they can drive while under the influence.

I would bypass it for two reasons. First, so that I don't have to be bothered by it. Second, as a form of rebellion. I don't know why you can't figure that out.

Originally Posted by tommyjones

To be planning to bypass it now, beofre it is even a factor, indicates an unhealthy attachment to alcohol.

Yeah, it took me all of three seconds to think of a way to bypass it. It took me more time to type the post.

BTW, I'd love to find a loophole in the no smoking in restaurants/bars law...and I don't smoke.

[pcjohnnyb (Premo)]

Originally Posted by ylexot

No, I would bypass the interlock to be rebellious.

I would bypass it for two reasons. First, so that I don't have to be bothered by it. Second, as a form of rebellion. I don't know why you can't figure that out.

Yeah, it took me all of three seconds to think of a way to bypass it. It took me more time to type the post.

BTW, I'd love to find a loophole in the no smoking in restaurants/bars law...and I don't smoke.

I am with you here. That is why I found it interesting that you need to "hum" to keep from cheating it or whatever. All you need is a little bass being put out and that should cause enough vibrations to fool it right? And I don't drink/drive either It is the same as someone thinking on how to rob a bank...doesn't mean they are actually going to do it.

and some bar did find a loophole on the smoking ban in another state. They staged a "theatre night" where all of the customers were "actors" because you are allowed to smoke in a theatrical presentation or something like that.

I forget where it was/the exact details

[AK-74me]

Originally Posted by ylexot

Remember that folks. If you don't plan to roll over for the nanny state, you must be an alcoholic!

I don't like this idea or DUI checkpoints, BTW anyone have a spare liver?

[cwo_ghwebb]

This is just another way for the government to control its citizens. I get tired of government trying to protect me from myself.

[ocean733 (Premo)]

I have a girlfriend in Philly. Her fiancee has a "blow and go" in the car. Apparently, you also need to suck at the end of the blow. I don't think a machine could do that.

[RoseRed (Premo)]

This would really suck if I had a glass or three of wine and decided to drive to my mailbox instead of walk. :lazy: I wouldn't even be on a public road.

[Dougstermd (Premo)]

Originally Posted by ylexot

Big difference there. They have them because of their problems with drinking and driving. I (and everyone else) would have them because it is a law of the nanny state. They would bypass so that they can continue bad behavior. I would bypass because I'm not a criminal and don't appreciate being treated like one. I would do it as rebellion.

Dude I totally disagree with your thought pattern here. if you were so willing to override the system with compressed air etc!!! Why not download the code for the RS port/eithernet port and get smashed and drive


I have had one of the said devices voluntary installed on one of my vehicles.
The DL test asked about 2o% of questions about when you are inpaired to drive. .05? .08? .10? how does anyone know if they are .05 or greater????


Yes I think a law mandaiting sampleing machines is ridiculous. Next it will be you can buy a gun but" we do not sell bullets to fit it. go down the alley and beside the guy that fixes breathalysers is a guy that has bullets"


hey they are tax free

[ylexot (Premo)]

Originally Posted by ocean733

I have a girlfriend in Philly. Her fiancee has a "blow and go" in the car. Apparently, you also need to suck at the end of the blow. I don't think a machine could do that.

I guess you're not an engineer. Design an interlock and I'll bypass it.

[tommyjones]

Originally Posted by ylexot

I guess you're not an engineer. Design an interlock and I'll bypass it.

yeah, no drinking problem here folks......

[Pete (Premo)]

Originally Posted by tommyjones

so you would drive drunk to be rebellious? i dont see the difference.

the only reason anyone would have to bypass the devices would be so they can drive while under the influence.

To be planning to bypass it now, beofre it is even a factor, indicates an unhealthy attachment to alcohol. If you can't even imagine not being able to drive when you have been drinking, you might have a serious problem.

Just when I thought I heard it all.