alledged child abuser let out thanks 2 j slade

[Cowgirl]

Originally Posted by ITS ME

But for instance, say I hate my neighbor and we argue constantly back and forth, and one day I feel really pissy towards them and I and fed up, say I go to the courts and get a restraining order against them saying they have threatened me, well at this point it is an alleged threat, but I can get an immediate retstraining order right then and their based on alledged threats cant I (granted there would be a court date like a week away), but nonetheless, I would still be able to get an immediate one temporary based on alledged threats. If I am correct (which I could be wrong, as I am not a cop, lawyer, or judge) why would a person that has been charged even if it is alleged, be released on conditions that he is not around any children, again correct me if I am wrong, but wouldnt a alledged child molester be released on conditions like that?

He's not an alleged child molester.

[sockgirl77 (Premo)]

Originally Posted by ITS ME

But for instance, say I hate my neighbor and we argue constantly back and forth, and one day I feel really pissy towards them and I and fed up, say I go to the courts and get a restraining order against them saying they have threatened me, well at this point it is an alleged threat, but I can get an immediate retstraining order right then and their based on alledged threats cant I (granted there would be a court date like a week away), but nonetheless, I would still be able to get an immediate one temporary based on alledged threats. If I am correct (which I could be wrong, as I am not a cop, lawyer, or judge) why would a person that has been charged even if it is alleged, be released on conditions that he is not around any children, again correct me if I am wrong, but wouldnt a alledged child molester be released on conditions like that?

It seems as if the mother has custody of the child. It's not the judge's fault that she's an idiot and stays with him. If anyone really cared about the child, they'd get involved with CPS or get a lawyer to get custody.

[ITS ME]

Originally Posted by CalvertNewbie

If he's so controlling, then she's stupid for allowing it. She needs to grow up, take control of her life and take care of her kids. Nobody controls you unless you allow it to happen.

Its alot easier to say than do, believe me. I have been on that side of the fence.

[Tigerlily]

How is the baby that was injured doing? Did she pass away? I only ask because if she is brain dead isn't it cruel to keep her alive artificially? If she has passed or were to pass, would the charges change to murder?

I also must say that something is amiss about the mother to stay in that home after all of what has happened really makes one question her judgement. Also apparently bio dad of the first baby is the one that cut off the family ties. As from what I have read he didn't want anything to do with his child and I guess didn't want his family to either.

What a tragedy for these kids.

[kom526]

Originally Posted by mgdbaa

well we all went to the custody hearing and we can not see her until we have cleared in a back round check. Mean while Child protective services are treating us as we have no right becuase we have neen baby autumn . Except for her grandmother who is also not allowed to see her until we have been cleared. Her grandmother( my sister basicly raised baby autumn until last spring when I laid into him about the way he treats the mother and baby autumn. He told the mother i was never to see baby autumn again. So now child protective feels becuase we have not seen her how can we be a good home for her. They are only listening to what the mother says and not calling us and talking to us. I did not know about hiring a public defender. I will tell my sister to look into that. Just please know this family has baby autumn and we want her out of that home. We don't care that the mother still lives there. If she choses to reside there, then fine. But we want Autumn out of there.

You and your family really have no rights when it comes to the older child. Tell me this, since Ryan is NOT the father of the older child, where is the BIOLOGICAL FATHER? Now if HE were do some talking, then MAYBE there would be some action on the part of CPS and the courts. If you and your family do all the legwork, aren't you being just accommodating as Ryan's family? WHY? Because you are not allowing the father to be RESPONSIBLE (look it up) for HIS child, not yours or your sister's child, HIS child.

OBTW, I don't think that you coming in here and posting all this information is or will help you out any in the long run.

[ITS ME]

Originally Posted by Cowgirl

He's not an alleged child molester.

I am not saying he is. Please read my post. I wondered why an alledged child abuser would not be required to stay away from children as a condition of his bail. It was noted that he was an "alleged" abuser so that is why he wasnt ordered not to have contact with other children. My reference was if a person was an ALLEDGED CHILD MOLESTER than he would more than likely have a condition of bail to stay away from anyone under the age of 18. So why is it different with an alleged abuser?

[Cowgirl]

Originally Posted by ITS ME

I am not saying he is. Please read my post. I wondered why an alledged child abuser would not be required to stay away from children as a condition of his bail. It was noted that he was an "alleged" abuser so that is why he wasnt ordered not to have contact with other children. My reference was if a person was an ALLEDGED CHILD MOLESTER than he would more than likely have a condition of bail to stay away from anyone under the age of 18. So why is it different with an alleged abuser?

I tried to read your post, but 1/3 of the paragraph was a run-on sentence. You never said "for example," so I assumed you were talking about this case when you said "alleged child molester."

[sockgirl77 (Premo)]

Originally Posted by Cowgirl

I tried to read your post, but 1/3 of the paragraph was a run-on sentence. You never said "for example," so I assumed you were talking about this case when you said "alleged child molester."

I read it the same way you did.

[kom526]

Originally Posted by Cowgirl

I tried to read your post, but 1/3 of the paragraph was a run-on sentence. You never said "for example," so I assumed you were talking about this case when you said "alleged child molester."

proofreadisyoufriendandmyfriendandeveryonesfriendanditmakesitsoveryeasytounderstandwhatyouaretryingtoconveytothereader.

[sockgirl77 (Premo)]

Originally Posted by kom526

proofreadisyoufriendandmyfriendandeveryonesfriendanditmakesitsoveryeasytounderstandwhatyouaretryingtoconveytothereader.