Obama's Hometown - Repeal the 2nd Amendment

[cwo_ghwebb]

At least they don't flip-flop.

They are so pizzed that the decision to carry or not to carry a handgun is now in the hands of the people and not the government. Boo-frickin'-Hoo!

Repeal the 2nd Amendment -- chicagotribune.com

[RadioPatrol]

This focus on "the availability of guns" -- ignoring the fact they were far more accessible only 40 years ago, when you could order a 20-mm Lahti anti-tank gun through the mail from an ad in the back of a comic book -- is intended not only to advance the prior agenda of those who want a disarmed and enslaved citizenry, but also to distract us from asking what it is about the mandatory behavior modification labs (public schools) which creates such rage and frustration in our incarcerated adolescent males. We don't see these shoot-em-ups in the private schools, or among home-schoolers.

Keep and Bear Arms - Gun Owners Home Page - 2nd Amendment Supporters

[RadioPatrol]

this is an excellent descriptions:




Its Plain English

"July 26, 1991

"Dear Professor Copperud:

"I am writing you to ask you for your professional opinion as an expert in English usage, to analyze the text of the Second Amendment to the United States Constitution, and extract the intent from the text.

"The text of the Second Amendment is, 'A well-regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.'

"The debate over this amendment has been whether the first part of the sentence, "A well-regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State," is a restrictive clause or a subordinate clause, with respect to the independent clause containing the subject of the sentence, "the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed."

"I would request that your analysis of this sentence not take into consideration issues of political impact or public policy, but be restricted entirely to a linguistic analysis of its meaning and intent. Further, since your professional analysis will likely become part of litigation regarding the consequences of the Second Amendment, I ask that whatever analysis you make be a professional opinion that you would be willing to stand behind with your reputation, and even be willing to testify under oath to support, if necessary."

My letter framed several questions about the text of the Second Amendment, then concluded:

"I realize that I am asking you to take on a major responsibility and task with this letter. I am doing so because, as a citizen, I believe it is vitally important to extract the actual meaning of the Second Amendment. While I ask that your analysis not be affected by the political importance of its results, I ask that you do this because of that importance.

"Sincerely,

"J. Neil Schulman"

the lefties are falling all over themselves to restrict the 2A with the Militia Clause ...

[RadioPatrol]

Right to Keep and Bear Arms

[cwo_ghwebb]

FTA: In doing so, they have curtailed the power of the legislatures and the city councils to protect their citizens.

Since when have legislatures or city councils ever protected citizens? They're just pizzed people, not government can make that decision now.

[chernmax]

WTF do they think is going to happen, law abiding citizens with registered firearms are going to turn into thugs or maybe start blasting their dumb asses coming through there windows!!! I support the latter!!!