Southern Maryland Online - Serving Calvert, Charles, & St. Mary's Counties.  Click here to go to the Front Page of somd.com.
 
| Write Us | Help | Sponsors | Classifieds | Employment | Forums | MarketPlace | Calendar | Headlines | Announcements | Weather | More... |


Go Back   Southern Maryland Community Forums > General Interest > News and Current Events
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Chat Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Wireless

News and Current Events What's going on in the world or right here in Southern Maryland? Other sources of what's happening locally: Headline News, Community Calendar, Announcements.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 07-08-2008, 08:24 PM   #21 (permalink)
I Need a Life
 
awpitt's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2002
Posts: 1,920
Quote:
Originally Posted by Larry Gude View Post
...please. He told me today, on my TV, that he'd let me in on it over the coming weeks.

You an insider or sumpin'?

PickensPlan





.
__________________
http://www.thetechpoint.com
awpitt is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Add post to Facebook
[ Reply w/Quote ]
Old 07-08-2008, 08:27 PM   #22 (permalink)
I Need a Life
 
awpitt's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2002
Posts: 1,920
http://www.pickensplan.com/theplan/




.
__________________
http://www.thetechpoint.com
awpitt is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Add post to Facebook
[ Reply w/Quote ]
Old 07-08-2008, 09:36 PM   #23 (permalink)
Deranged
 
MMDad's Avatar
 
Member Since: Aug 2005
Posts: 14,045
Quote:
Originally Posted by kwillia View Post
I still cannot grasp why we allow speculation on futures and the speculators that are driving up the futures prices are the very same ones profitting from the future speculations. Why is this legal...
You know something, the press has been touting "speculators" as the problem, but are they really? Do we really think that a few investors in the US are driving the price of a worldwide commodity?

It's a very US-centric view of a worldwide problem. Suppose we stop US speculators from investing in the market. Who is hurt? The pension plans that own the futures. (Me and you, sweetie.)

Who does it help? Nobody, because there are still plenty of investors in the rest of the world who are just as willing to prop up the prices. We do not have control over them.

Will it make prices fall? No.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by toppick08 View Post
I wish you and your whore mama, both rot in Hell.....Shall I use more smilies for ya'?....
MMDad is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Add post to Facebook
[ Reply w/Quote ]
Old 07-08-2008, 10:44 PM   #24 (permalink)
Rightie
 
Bann's Avatar
 
Member Since: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,573
I saw the Pickens commercial tonight - the one where he says he's going to tell us more soon. He did say something about drilling (only?) won't get us out of this. I'll have to go check out that link.

I've seen so much back & forth about it's the supply & demand, it's the speculators, it's the corn on the cob. No wait, that's not right. I swear there's an opinion a day on it.

Just drill dammit!
__________________
"Uh, uh, are, uh, uh, uh, um" ~ Barack Obama
Bann is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Add post to Facebook
[ Reply w/Quote ]
Old 07-09-2008, 06:36 AM   #25 (permalink)
Strung Out
 
Larry Gude's Avatar
 
Member Since: Feb 2001
Posts: 22,785
Profit...

Quote:
Originally Posted by kwillia View Post
I still cannot grasp why we allow speculation on futures and the speculators that are driving up the futures prices are the very same ones profitting from the future speculations. Why is this legal...
...motive is the primary purpose and I'm OK with that for the most part.

The thing is, oil is not a commodity anymore. It is not perishable. It is not subject to bad seasons, wind, hail, locust or otherwise. It is a fully mature and protected industry and it is also a monopoly.

You can do without pig bellies or orange juice or Wheaties or find very suitable substitutes given a crop problem.

The speculation in commodities is there for people in the various business's to hedge their costs over time given their market expertise and experience. There were financial penalties for those outside the business, retirement funds, pure speculators and so forth, who had to pay higher margins (more money down) and higher capital gains. This started in the 1920's, the Grain Act, to keep the highs and lows driven by pure speculation in control.

The law was changed in 2000 and it's taken 7 years to be fully exploited.
__________________
'I think popular music in this country is one of the few things in the twentieth century that has made giant strides in reverse.'

Bing Crosby
Larry Gude is online now  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Add post to Facebook
[ Reply w/Quote ]
Old 07-09-2008, 06:41 AM   #26 (permalink)
Strung Out
 
Larry Gude's Avatar
 
Member Since: Feb 2001
Posts: 22,785
Speculation...

Quote:
Originally Posted by MMDad View Post
You know something, the press has been touting "speculators" as the problem, but are they really? Do we really think that a few investors in the US are driving the price of a worldwide commodity?

It's a very US-centric view of a worldwide problem. Suppose we stop US speculators from investing in the market. Who is hurt? The pension plans that own the futures. (Me and you, sweetie.)

Who does it help? Nobody, because there are still plenty of investors in the rest of the world who are just as willing to prop up the prices. We do not have control over them.

Will it make prices fall? No.
...is responsible for 1/3 the cost of a barrel of oil.

If you think that isn't hurting pension plans and you and me, think again. Your plan give you $2,400 a year gain for nothing? Tax free?
__________________
'I think popular music in this country is one of the few things in the twentieth century that has made giant strides in reverse.'

Bing Crosby
Larry Gude is online now  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Add post to Facebook
[ Reply w/Quote ]
Old 07-09-2008, 08:55 AM   #27 (permalink)
Registered User
 
This_person's Avatar
 
Member Since: Dec 2006
Posts: 5,453
Quote:
Originally Posted by awpitt View Post
Thanks for the link.

The natural gas component makes sense from the point of view of cars, but not electricity. Natural gas plants are ususally "peakers", started up and used only when demand is highest. Using natural gas to also run a large portion of cars is a fairly inexpensive conversion kit, and the fueling stations would not be hard to create as there is already a natural gas infrastructure in the country.

For the short term, coal plants are relatively quick to build, and we have incredible natural resources. But, nuclear is far cleaner and better overall. It just takes longer to build.

The wind component just doesn't make sense to me, though. Unreliable, inefficient, enormous land waste, etc., etc.

I was hoping he had a realistic plan. When he ends the video with "we need the right leadership, and we need people to cooperate", he lost me in thinking his plan was implementable.
__________________
Judge of a man by his questions rather than by his answers. Voltaire (1694 - 1778)
This_person is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Add post to Facebook
[ Reply w/Quote ]
Old 07-09-2008, 08:56 AM   #28 (permalink)
Deranged
 
MMDad's Avatar
 
Member Since: Aug 2005
Posts: 14,045
Quote:
Originally Posted by Larry Gude View Post
...is responsible for 1/3 the cost of a barrel of oil.
Is it? Congress "investigated" and found no evidence of improper practices. Do you have something to share?

I still believe it is supply and demand. We demand it, we're willing to pay the price, and we pay it. We've reduced our demand in the US, but China scoops that up and keeps demand right where it was.

There are only two solutions to this: reduce global demand, or get out of the global market.

Speculators are a distraction that really has nothing to do with the problem. It's a lot easier to blame some nameless "speculators" than it is to blame ourselves for our excessive consumption and unwillingness to use alternatives.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by toppick08 View Post
I wish you and your whore mama, both rot in Hell.....Shall I use more smilies for ya'?....
MMDad is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Add post to Facebook
[ Reply w/Quote ]
Old 07-09-2008, 08:58 AM   #29 (permalink)
Strung Out
 
Larry Gude's Avatar
 
Member Since: Feb 2001
Posts: 22,785
Thank...

Quote:
Originally Posted by This_person View Post
The wind component just doesn't make sense to me, though. Unreliable, inefficient, enormous land waste, etc., etc.
...you. Wind is pretty much a joke. What makes it worse is that it is real big with people who swear the climate is changing. If so, why would you invest in something dependent on a stable, predictable climate? Hell, the wind could lessen. It could become too strong.
__________________
'I think popular music in this country is one of the few things in the twentieth century that has made giant strides in reverse.'

Bing Crosby
Larry Gude is online now  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Add post to Facebook
[ Reply w/Quote ]
Old 07-09-2008, 08:58 AM   #30 (permalink)
I Need a Life
 
awpitt's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2002
Posts: 1,920
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bann View Post
I saw the Pickens commercial tonight - the one where he says he's going to tell us more soon. He did say something about drilling (only?) won't get us out of this. I'll have to go check out that link.

I've seen so much back & forth about it's the supply & demand, it's the speculators, it's the corn on the cob. No wait, that's not right. I swear there's an opinion a day on it.

Just drill dammit!
If you watch the video on the Pickens homepage, he does a real basic explainantion of his plan. He was on CNN this morning. He doesn't say we shouldn't drill but he does say that drilling is not going to fix the problem, it is only part of the solution. One thing he pointed out is that even if we open ANWR it's production is limited by the capacity of the Alaska pipeline.
__________________
http://www.thetechpoint.com
awpitt is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Add post to Facebook
[ Reply w/Quote ]
Reply




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:33 PM.



| Home | Help | Contact Us | About somd.com | Privacy | Advertising | Sponsors | Newsletter |

| What's New | What's Cool | Top Rated | Add A Link | Mod a Link | Link to Us |

| Announcements | Bookstore | Chat | Calendar | Classifieds | Community |
| Contests & Surveys | Culture | Dating | Dining | Education | Employment | Entertainment |
| Forums | Free E-Mail | Games | Gear! | Government | Guestbook | Health | Marketplace | Mortgage | News |
| Organizations | Photos | Postcard | Real Estate | Relocation | Sports | Survey | Travel | Wiki | Weather | Worship |

Brought to you by Virtually Everything, Inc.   ©1996-2008, All rights reserved.


SEO by vBSEO 3.1.0 ©2007, Crawlability, Inc.