2885 Brownlee Ave, Columbus Ohio

[cwo_ghwebb]

Vote early! Vote often! (Pssst, we all use this address!)

Here’s the stench: An entire houseful of young, non-Ohioan Democrat activists have used the Brownlee Avenue address to register themselves to vote in the Buckeye State and secure absentee ballots under extremely shady circumstances — all while mobilizing a large effort to register thousands of others for absentee and early voting. The activists are leaders of a group called “Vote From Home ‘08.” The group is self-identified as having “extensive experience with political organizing, election administration, and Democratic politics.” They were hailed as the “Justice League” by a Daily Kos blogger. Their Facebook page brags: “Want to turn the Presidential election blue in a key swing state? Vote from Home is a political organization that was founded by a team of young people for the purpose of assisting, aiding, and tracking voters to elect progressive candidates to the White House. Encouraged by the excitement of the 2008 elections and the movement around the Democratic candidates, Vote From Home will be in Ohio seeking to deliver 10,000 votes to Democratic candidates statewide.”

Losing the debates on merit, socialists resort to attempting to win elections by fraud.

Houseful of out-of-state Obama activists registered as Ohio voters, received absentee ballots

[ImnoMensa]

Originally Posted by cwo_ghwebb

Vote early! Vote often! (Pssst, we all use this address!)

Here’s the stench: An entire houseful of young, non-Ohioan Democrat activists have used the Brownlee Avenue address to register themselves to vote in the Buckeye State and secure absentee ballots under extremely shady circumstances — all while mobilizing a large effort to register thousands of others for absentee and early voting. The activists are leaders of a group called “Vote From Home ‘08.” The group is self-identified as having “extensive experience with political organizing, election administration, and Democratic politics.” They were hailed as the “Justice League” by a Daily Kos blogger. Their Facebook page brags: “Want to turn the Presidential election blue in a key swing state? Vote from Home is a political organization that was founded by a team of young people for the purpose of assisting, aiding, and tracking voters to elect progressive candidates to the White House. Encouraged by the excitement of the 2008 elections and the movement around the Democratic candidates, Vote From Home will be in Ohio seeking to deliver 10,000 votes to Democratic candidates statewide.”

Losing the debates on merit, socialists resort to attempting to win elections by fraud.

Houseful of out-of-state Obama activists registered as Ohio voters, received absentee ballots

It seems reasonable to assume that Ohio has been targeted by the DNC for fraudulen voting. Can they do this without the aid and comfort of the loal voting board?? I dont think so. It would seem that even the most stupid election board could spot the fraud here and make some effort to stop it.

[vraiblonde]

And yet they are the same ones who scream the loudest about "stolen" elections.

[Pete (Premo)]

Originally Posted by vraiblonde

And yet they are the same ones who scream the loudest about "stolen" elections.

Funny aint it?

[SamSpade]

Originally Posted by vraiblonde

And yet they are the same ones who scream the loudest about "stolen" elections.

While I was Googling about for accuracy in presidential polling, I cam across several articles about the exit polls in 2004 - with a few of them highlighting some very crucial errors that allowed them to be so very far off. Probably some of the most telling is that in certain regions, BUSH appeared to be winning an area he eventually lost.

But there were several articles griping about how accurate exit polling is, and how, if the exit polls differed so much with the election results, it pointed towards fraud, even though no evidence of fraud came up. They had your usual conspiracy theory approaches to science - anecdotal information coupled with a LACK of actual data (conspiracy theorists thrive on the ABSENCE of data in the face of "suspicious" activity).

What kills me though, is that the writers are so worked up over it, they're convinced that exit polls should be 100% trusted, but not an actual counting of the votes - because the voting process is so susceptible to corruption.

And polling ISN'T? If we used POLLS to elect Presidents, is there a person alive who thinks they'd be without a trace of fraud? Why does anyone think that a private organization would do it honestly, but the public process is rife with fraud?