| | #2 (permalink) |
| ... | with just a a family of three, mom, dad, youngun, 70k is going to be real hard to live on if you plan to do more than just eat and work. college would almost be out of the question unless the kid got scholorships or was a minority.
__________________ "What country can preserve its liberties, if its rulers are not warned from time to time that this people preserve the spirit of resistance? Let them take arms." (Thomas Jefferson) Congress has not unlimited powers to provide for the general welfare, but only those specifically enumerated. (Thomas Jefferson on the General Welfare) POOR PEOPLE HAVE BEEN VOTING FOR DEMOCRATS FOR 50 YEARS, AND THEY'RE STILL POOR |
| | [ Reply w/Quote ] |
| | #3 (permalink) | |
| Say What? Member Since: Dec 2007 Location: I have two homes. One is a burrow and the other is a hole in the ground.
Posts: 2,663
| Quote:
![]() ![]() ![]()
__________________ | |
| | [ Reply w/Quote ] |
| | #4 (permalink) |
| No Use for Donk Twits Member Since: Jul 2005 Location: Costa Rica bound
Posts: 6,672
| My step-son is head of household for a family of four. Their combined income is less than $40k/year. They qualify for absolutely no assistance (nor want it). But starting next year the possibility of losing his job may be very probable as his employer has to pay double the unemployment insurance tax and cut employees.
__________________ I don't accept the false premise that I'm not the Messiah and I'm not infallible! - B.O. |
| | [ Reply w/Quote ] |
| | #5 (permalink) | |
| Registered User Member Since: Jul 2007
Posts: 9,041
| Quote:
| |
| | [ Reply w/Quote ] |
| | #6 (permalink) | |
| No Use for Donk Twits Member Since: Jul 2005 Location: Costa Rica bound
Posts: 6,672
| Quote:
Washington Times - Obama camp changes tax-cut beneficiaries "At this rate, it won't take long until Obama is again raising taxes on Americans making as little as $42,000 a year," said Alex Conant, the Republican National Committee's spokesman, referring to Mr. Obama's vote for a Democratic budget resolution that would have let most of President Bush's tax cuts expire, effectively raising income taxes on Americans making $41,500, according to FactCheck.org. The Obama tax plan's descending income thresholds has not escaped the notice of Sen. John McCain's campaign, nor the RNC's army of researchers, who were sending out a drumbeat of press releases all week, monitoring the time and place of the Obama campaign's changing numbers. Among those changes: -- In July: "If you make $250,000 a year or less, we will not raise your taxes. We will cut your taxes," Mr. Obama said in remarks at Powder Springs, Ga. -- In October: "If you have a job, pay taxes and make less than $200,000 a year, you'll get a tax cut," Mr. Obama said in a TV ad titled "Defining Moment" that has been running across the country. -- Last week: "What we're saying is that [Mr. Bush's tax cuts to the wealthy] ... should go to middle-class people - people making under $150,000 a year," said Mr. Biden in an interview with WNEP in Scranton, Pa. -- Friday: Mr. Obama "is basically looking at $120,000 and under [as] among those that are in the middle class and there is a tax cut" for them, Mr. Richardson said on KOA-AM in Denver. The Obama campaign's varying words on who would be eligible for Mr. Obama's tax cuts left economists Friday scratching their heads and wondering just who would benefit and who would not. "Every time we look, his plan changes. Anything is possible," said McCain economic adviser Kevin Hassett at the American Enterprise Institute. The Obama campaign denied moving away from the senator's original tax-cut plan. It said Friday that Mr. Richardson "simply misspoke" when he used the $120,000 figure and "meant to say people making less than $250,000 won't see their taxes increased." The statement said: "Senator Obama wouldn't raise taxes on families making less than $250,000." However, other economic analysts said that the Obama campaign's declining income eligibility levels for his tax cuts raises troubling questions about Mr. Obama's promise to give tax cuts to 95 percent of all taxpayers. "A lot of people may vote for Obama thinking they are going to get a tax cut are going to get a tax hike," said Phil Kerpen, director of policy at Americans for Prosperity, a free-market advocacy group. "What is clearly going on here is the changing definition of what constitutes the middle class," said economist Bruce Bartlett, adding that "the vast majority of Americans say they are middle class and very few think of themselves as either rich or poor." I think I already pay my 'fair share' of taxes! I don't think I'm poor nor rich, but at this point I have no idea what the socialists have in mind regarding taxing me more heavily. Since they are going to allow the Bush tax cuts to expire, they are starting from a higher tax rate from which to begin raising taxes.
__________________ I don't accept the false premise that I'm not the Messiah and I'm not infallible! - B.O. | |
| | [ Reply w/Quote ] |
| | #7 (permalink) |
| Yum! Member Since: Oct 2007
Posts: 13,474
| While I'm seeing some comments at numbers below $200k, Obama has not said below 200k and his commercial I saw yesterday said 200k. So the words out of his mouth have been 200k. Hopefully he won't toy with that number. I have a feeling it'll be changed...but that'll be based on affordability. After he gets his other changes approved, he won't be able to pass tax cuts to 200k and lower if there isn't enough money to run that big government. So while the tax cuts sound nice, I doubt 200k will be the final number unless he cuts some of his other plans or pulls money out of something else... |
| | [ Reply w/Quote ] |
| | #8 (permalink) | |
| No Use for Donk Twits Member Since: Jul 2005 Location: Costa Rica bound
Posts: 6,672
| Quote:
__________________ I don't accept the false premise that I'm not the Messiah and I'm not infallible! - B.O. | |
| | [ Reply w/Quote ] |
| | #9 (permalink) |
| Yum! Member Since: Oct 2007
Posts: 13,474
| I was talking about the tax cuts that Obama has been discussing during his campaign...not his 2003 numbers on the middle class. Sorry if there was a misunderstanding. |
| | [ Reply w/Quote ] |
| | #10 (permalink) | |
| Im going to eat you! Member Since: Dec 2003
Posts: 3,018
| Quote:
But 70k is no way the top of the middle class.
__________________ "An elected legislature can trample a man's rights as easily as a king can." | |
| | [ Reply w/Quote ] |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |
| Home | Help | Contact Us | About somd.com | Privacy | Advertising | Sponsors | Newsletter |
| What's New | What's Cool | Top Rated | Add A Link | Mod a Link | Link to Us |
| Announcements
| Bookstore
| Chat
| Calendar
| Classifieds
| Community
|
| Contests & Surveys
| Culture
| Dating
| Dining
| Education
| Employment
| Entertainment
|
| Forums
| Free E-Mail
| Games
| Gear!
| Government
| Guestbook
| Health
| Marketplace
| Mortgage
| News
|
| Organizations
| Photos
| Postcard
| Real Estate
| Relocation
| Sports
| Survey
| Travel
| Wiki
| Weather
| Worship
|
Brought to you by Virtually Everything, Inc. ©1996-2009, All rights reserved.