California Gays just wont give up! Damn Freaks!

[ironintestines]

Originally Posted by PsyOps

You're gay aren't you.






it's okay, no one will make fun of you.

Nahh. Just pokin at gay people w/ a stick. I know some, but I don't play in the same sand box as they do

[puggymom]

Originally Posted by This_person

Now, remember, when you do this, the next questions will be:

• So, what about polygamists? As long as all parties are adults and consent who cares? Serious question--Wasn't polygamy OK in the bible?
  Incestuous relationships among consenting adults? As long as one is not a parent because that just screams abuse otherwise only an issue if they have biological children

Also keep in mind that California has a civil union status, so all of the other so called advantages of a marriage license are already available for a homosexual union, just under a different name (based on being a different category of union). This is the whole separate but equal thing--already determined illegal during the civil rights movement

And the whole animal thing is a different argument as animals cannot consent. We are dealing with consenting human adults.

[bcp (Premo)]

Originally Posted by puggymom

And the whole animal thing is a different argument as animals cannot consent. We are dealing with consenting human adults.

brother and sister can consent, a 13 year old can consent, multible wives can consent

[puggymom]

Originally Posted by bcp

brother and sister can consent, a 13 year old can consent, multible wives can consent

Read what it is red...as long as they are consenting ADULTS (over 18) who cares?

[Larry Gude (Premo)]

Originally Posted by Uncle Rico

[
Here we go again. Why can't the gays give it up? The MAJORITY of people don't want to approve of gay marraige.

The majority of people think Obama will be a good president.
The majority used to think slavery was fine.
The majority used to think women shouldn't vote.
The majority think man is responsible for global warming.
The majority watch American Idle.

None of that makes it right. We are NOT a democracy. We are a constitutional representative republic.

it is silly and a violation of the constitution to give a tinkers damn what two adults do in terms of a legal contract that has nothing to do with anyone else.

If we're smart, and we're not, we'd be working for agreement that marriage is between two consenting adults.

Never let the pursuit of the perfect become the enemy of the good.

[puggymom]

Originally Posted by Larry Gude

The majority of people think Obama will be a good president.
The majority used to think slavery was fine.
The majority used to think women shouldn't vote.
The majority think man is responsible for global warming.
The majority watch American Idle.

None of that makes it right. We are NOT a democracy. We are a constitutional representative republic.

it is silly and a violation of the constitution to give a tinkers damn what two adults do in terms of a legal contract that has nothing to do with anyone else.

If we're smart, and we're not, we'd be working for agreement that marriage is between two consenting adults.

Never let the pursuit of the perfect become the enemy of the good.

[bcp (Premo)]

Originally Posted by puggymom

Read what it is red...as long as they are consenting ADULTS (over 18) who cares?

13 was considered adult a couple hundred years or so ago.

besides, 18 is just a made up number by society, what is the legal basis for
The constitution says all men are created equal, The way I see it, we are taking the constitutional rights from people that are under the age of 18.

It would be best to just drop all age requirements for everything.

[Larry Gude (Premo)]

Originally Posted by bcp

It would be best to just drop all age requirements for everything.

...that's funny. I was thinking it would be best to raise them.

30 to vote sounds about right to me.

[bcp (Premo)]

Originally Posted by Larry Gude

...that's funny. I was thinking it would be best to raise them.

30 to vote sounds about right to me.

although after the recent election I tend to agree with that based in the idiocy of the young,,, it is still unconstitutional to limit civil activities based on age.
think of it this way. the real damage from an administration comes after that administration leaves, that means that the people that will be feeling the full impact of the obama presidency are from 10 to 14 years of age right now. They should have a say in how they want the country to be structured the day they get out of school.

[Larry Gude (Premo)]

Originally Posted by bcp

although after the recent election I tend to agree with that based in the idiocy of the young,,, it is still unconstitutional to limit civil activities based on age.
think of it this way. the real damage from an administration comes after that administration leaves, that means that the people that will be feeling the full impact of the obama presidency are from 10 to 14 years of age right now. They should have a say in how they want the country to be structured the day they get out of school.

...age limits pass constitutional muster because they are inclusive and do not distinguish one 18 year old from another for any reason; Equal protection.