Southern Maryland Online - Serving Calvert, Charles, & St. Mary's Counties.  Click here to go to the Front Page of somd.com.
 
| Write Us | Help | Sponsors | Classifieds | Employment | Forums | MarketPlace | Calendar | Headlines | Announcements | Weather | More... |


Go Back   Southern Maryland Community Forums > General Interest > News and Current Events

News and Current Events What's going on in the world or right here in Southern Maryland? Other sources of what's happening locally: Headline News, Community Calendar, Announcements.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 10-08-2010, 12:31 PM   #31
Resident PIA
 
BernieP's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jun 2004
Posts: 3,221
Quote:
Originally Posted by bcp View Post
I doubt that the government can force you to purchase a product from a private for profit business,.n.
who carries your state mandated auto insurance policy?
__________________
Your signature can not be longer than 100 characters - BS
BernieP is online now   [ Reply w/Quote ]
Old 10-08-2010, 01:20 PM   #32
In My Opinion
 
Member Since: Dec 2005
Posts: 42,895
Quote:
Originally Posted by BernieP View Post
who carries your state mandated auto insurance policy?
How many times does this have to be covered.

I am only required to purchase insurance if I wish to own a car.

I am also required to maintain homeowners insurance if I have a mortgage.

I can get out of paying for either one simply by not purchasing the item that requires financial coverage in case of accident or loss.

The state or federal government (auto insurance is state mandated by the way, not federal.. makes a difference here when reading the constitution) can not force me to purchase either insurance if I do not own a home or car.

but, for the federal government to force me to purchase health insurance simply because I live, that is wrong and is not equal to auto or home.
__________________
Fear the Government that Fears your gun.
bcp is offline   [ Reply w/Quote ]
Old 10-08-2010, 01:27 PM   #33
..
 
Tilted's Avatar
 
Member Since: Aug 2007
Posts: 10,857
Quote:
Originally Posted by bcp View Post
How many times does this have to be covered.

I am only required to purchase insurance if I wish to own a car.

I am also required to maintain homeowners insurance if I have a mortgage.

I can get out of paying for either one simply by not purchasing the item that requires financial coverage in case of accident or loss.

The state or federal government (auto insurance is state mandated by the way, not federal.. makes a difference here when reading the constitution) can not force me to purchase either insurance if I do not own a home or car.

but, for the federal government to force me to purchase health insurance simply because I live, that is wrong and is not equal to auto or home.
Does any government require you to have home owner's insurance if you have a mortgage, or are you referring to mortgage holders generally requiring it? If the former, I did not know that.
__________________
You have it all wrong President Obama... The risk of death isn't the price we pay for liberty, the risk of death is the price we pay for life. The price we pay for liberty is being accountable for our own actions - that, and the burden of holding others individually accountable for theirs.
Tilted is offline   [ Reply w/Quote ]
Old 10-08-2010, 01:31 PM   #34
#*! boat!
 
Gilligan's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jul 2009
Posts: 15,676
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tilted View Post
Does any government require you to have home owner's insurance if you have a mortgage, or are you referring to mortgage holders generally requiring it? If the former, I did not know that.
The governement can and does force homeowners to carry flood insurance in certain cases (like my property)..not sure about any government requirements for homeowner's insurance though.
Gilligan is offline   [ Reply w/Quote ]
Old 10-08-2010, 01:31 PM   #35
In My Opinion
 
Member Since: Dec 2005
Posts: 42,895
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tilted View Post
Does any government require you to have home owner's insurance if you have a mortgage, or are you referring to mortgage holders generally requiring it? If the former, I did not know that.
actually I think thats the mortgage company that requires it. As far as I know the governments dont really care if you have it or not.

except Im not sure about the liability part of it, might be some requirement to keep at least that just in case someone gets hurt on your property.
__________________
Fear the Government that Fears your gun.
bcp is offline   [ Reply w/Quote ]
Old 10-08-2010, 01:35 PM   #36
..
 
Tilted's Avatar
 
Member Since: Aug 2007
Posts: 10,857
Quote:
Originally Posted by hvp05 View Post
Lefties' favorite tactic is to take a fact, misconstrue it then build their argument around the misrepresentation. That could give them clearance to make up any sort of projection then blame a shortfall on the people. In turn, Congress would seek to exert more control to generate said activity... all for "the good of the people" lest we have another economic catastrophe from too little 'activity'.

This whole deal stinks in SO many ways. Ugh.
As Nucklesack already mentioned, that kind of tactic is by no means implored by just lefties.

As relates to this situation in particular (i.e. the Constitutionality of the individual mandate), one of the main reasons we are so far down this Commerce Clause slippery slope is the (ridiculous) Raich decision that our buddies Justice Scalia and Justice Kennedy (joining with Justices Stevens, Souter, Ginsburg and Breyer) helped to give us, and for which Justice Scalia wrote a very dissappointing concurrence.
__________________
You have it all wrong President Obama... The risk of death isn't the price we pay for liberty, the risk of death is the price we pay for life. The price we pay for liberty is being accountable for our own actions - that, and the burden of holding others individually accountable for theirs.
Tilted is offline   [ Reply w/Quote ]
Old 10-08-2010, 01:40 PM   #37
..
 
Tilted's Avatar
 
Member Since: Aug 2007
Posts: 10,857
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gilligan View Post
The governement can and does force homeowners to carry flood insurance in certain cases (like my property)..not sure about any government requirements for homeowner's insurance though.
That I have little trouble believing.

Quote:
Originally Posted by bcp View Post
actually I think thats the mortgage company that requires it. As far as I know the governments dont really care if you have it or not.

except Im not sure about the liability part of it, might be some requirement to keep at least that just in case someone gets hurt on your property.
They don't have such a liability requirement as far as I'm aware. I've never heard of insurance providers having to notify the government when people let their home owner's insurance lapse (like they do when the same happens with auto insurance). I'm pretty sure I've let mine lapse before and I've never gotten a notice or bill from Annapolis insisting that I'd been a bad boy.
__________________
You have it all wrong President Obama... The risk of death isn't the price we pay for liberty, the risk of death is the price we pay for life. The price we pay for liberty is being accountable for our own actions - that, and the burden of holding others individually accountable for theirs.
Tilted is offline   [ Reply w/Quote ]
Old 10-08-2010, 01:47 PM   #38
Resident PIA
 
BernieP's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jun 2004
Posts: 3,221
Quote:
Originally Posted by bcp View Post
How many times does this have to be covered.

I am only required to purchase insurance if I wish to own a car.
But you are forced to purchase the liability policy from a for profit provider.
I am not arguing in favor of the law, but I think auto insurance, more precisely the unisured motorist / liability coverage mandate is similiar to the health insurance mandate.
Not only are you required to cover yourself, but you are paying for those (unisured motorists) who don't have coverage.
__________________
Your signature can not be longer than 100 characters - BS
BernieP is online now   [ Reply w/Quote ]
Old 10-08-2010, 02:47 PM   #39
Rich
 
waupaca's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 2004
Posts: 213
Insurance

Quote:
Originally Posted by bcp View Post
But we are all required to pay in. no option



A requirement to owning the car is that I insure it. I would agree with your anology if the government also forced me to purchase a car. But they dont.
they simply say, if you drive, you must purchase insurance or put X number of dollars in a fund to cover any possible loss/expense. (you did know that option was available right?)
Not totally true. You do not have to purchase auto insurance, but must pay to Uninsured Motorists Fund. But if you purchase a car, your lender will require that you insure vechicle.
waupaca is offline   [ Reply w/Quote ]
Old 10-08-2010, 05:38 PM   #40
Pixelated
 
PsyOps's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 2006
Posts: 21,665
Quote:
Originally Posted by bcp View Post
(I think they call this "long term Care insurance")
Quote:
Originally Posted by awpitt View Post
Long Term Care insurance would've been a good plan. My Mom bought some years ago so if the time comes when she need that sort of care, it'll be covered.
As far as I know it, long-term care doesn’t cover health-related care such as surgeries, cancer treatments, doctor’s visits, MRIs, medication, etc… It covers daily living care (i.e. assisted living, hospice, nursing home care, etc…). And, it's pretty expensive. So you're asking people to be able to invest in regular health insurance AND long-term care insurance when the average person can barely afford health insurance.
__________________
You get the government you deserve.
PsyOps is offline   [ Reply w/Quote ]
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:22 PM.

SEO by vBSEO 3.6.0 ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.