Where is the outrage?????

[JoeRider]

Originally Posted by Baja28

Zimmerman was tried and convicted; by every liberal news outlet and every black person alive.

Yea, an now the Funeral home director is getting in to it.

[BOP]

Originally Posted by thatguy

If zimmerman had been convicted of killing Martin there wouldn't be this outrage either.
I think the outcome has more to do with the outrage than race does.

Yeah, let's never mind that whole "innocent until proven guilty" thing. Let's just skip right to the part where we convict him and hang him.

Oh, and look the other way at the double standard where bleeding hearts everywhere continue to carry on about their precious cop-killer in Philadelphia.

[thatguy]

Wirelessly posted

Originally Posted by BOP

Yeah, let's never mind that whole "innocent until proven guilty" thing. Let's just skip right to the part where we convict him and hang him.

Oh, and look the other way at the double standard where bleeding hearts everywhere continue to carry on about their precious cop-killer in Philadelphia.

Try to keep up. I am not saying Zimmerman SHOULD be convicted. I am specifically talking about why his case is not comparable to the one in this thread. The perp in that case was tried and convicted. Obviously a different set of circumstances.

[cwo_ghwebb]

Originally Posted by thatguy

Wirelessly posted



It's completely unrelated and unrelatable because the perpetrator was arrested, tried and convicted of the crime. If Zimmerman had also been tried and convicted you wouldn't have heard anything about that case either.

The media had not made a fuss (as in the Martin case), before the perp was arrested. No group put out a bounty on this perp before he was arrested. No double standard by the media, now is there?

[Baja28 (Premo)]

Originally Posted by thatguy

Wirelessly posted
Try to keep up. I am not saying Zimmerman SHOULD be convicted. I am specifically talking about why his case is not comparable to the one in this thread. The perp in that case was tried and convicted. Obviously a different set of circumstances.

Maybe the police looked at the evidence and decided there was no case. Why would the police chief and others risk their careers for this guy? Aren't the Kenyans LEO's there? Why haven't they made an arrest?

[thatguy]

Wirelessly posted

Originally Posted by cwo_ghwebb

The media had not made a fuss (as in the Martin case), before the perp was arrested. No group put out a bounty on this perp before he was arrested. No double standard by the media, now is there?

How long after the murders was the arrest made in this case?
In the Martin case it was a couple weeks before the parents began expressing their outrage and several more before this became a national story.

Again,I just don't think these two cases just are relatable.

[Gilligan (Premo)]

Originally Posted by thatguy

[In the Martin case it was a couple weeks before the parents began expressing their outrage and several more before this became a national story.

.

What calender are you using?? The incident occured on the 26th of February and has been news for over two weeks already...

[PsyOps (Premo)]

Originally Posted by thatguy

Try to keep up. I am not saying Zimmerman SHOULD be convicted. I am specifically talking about why his case is not comparable to the one in this thread. The perp in that case was tried and convicted. Obviously a different set of circumstances.

It’s an ongoing and amazing thing to have to point out the obvious to your biased cranium.

Of course they’re not comparable. THAT’S THE POINT! They're not comparable and perhaps they should be. In Tyson’s case, the black community - EVERY COMMUNITY – kept quiet about it, and let the law do its thing. There was no outrage anywhere about it being a black on white killing, racially motivated, A HATE CRIME!

You just refuse to see the double-standard people are trying to point out. Your bias wont allow you. I am outraged that Trayvon is dead. I am outraged that Tyson felt he had to kill two white guys that innocently wandered into his neighborhood. But I am equally outraged that there was silence in an obvious case of racially motivated murder (Tyson), while there is outrage in a case where there is no obvious instance of racial motivation (Zimmerman).

Why is it so hard for people to just go home, shut up about it until the FACTS come out, and let the law do its thing? It wasn’t so hard in Tyson’s case?

[thatguy]

Wirelessly posted

Originally Posted by Gilligan

What calender are you using?? The incident occured on the 26th of February and has been news for over two weeks already...

You are right, it did hit the national news about two weeks ago. Still, that case has gone over a month with no arrest. The case is this thread is not comparable as far as I can tell At least not in that respect.

[PsyOps (Premo)]

And about this story?

Murders of Channon Christian and Christopher Newsom - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The Killings of Channon Christian and Chris Newsom

This went mostly ignored throughout the news. A white couple brutally raped, tortured and murdered by 5 black people. This has to be one of the most heinous crimes I ever heard about. If you can read this story without getting sweaty palms and almost brought to tears from the absolute horror and hate of this crime then you have a gaping hole right in the middle of your heart.

Two UNARMED and completely innocent people tortured and snuffed out all because they were apparently white. It appears concerted efforts were made to keep the race of the perps silent. No Al Sharpton or Jesse Jackson to voice outrage over the killing of two innocent UNAMRED white people by 5 black people. Shhhh… we don’t want to taint the legal process with bias.

Hank and Thatguy… CAN YOU NOW SEE THE DOUBLE STANDARD?