Southern Maryland Online - Serving Calvert, Charles, & St. Mary's Counties.  Click here to go to the Front Page of somd.com.
 
| Write Us | Help | Sponsors | Classifieds | Employment | Forums | MarketPlace | Calendar | Headlines | Announcements | Weather | More... |


Go Back   Southern Maryland Community Forums > General Interest > News and Current Events

News and Current Events What's going on in the world or right here in Southern Maryland? Other sources of what's happening locally: Headline News, Community Calendar, Announcements.

Like Tree52Likes

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 11-19-2012, 03:18 PM   #1
Repete
 
Pete's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jan 2003
Location: Hollywood
Posts: 50,927
I find this disturbing

Miss USA contestant Allyn Rose to undergo preventative double mastectomy | Fox News

Discuss please
Pete is offline   [ Reply w/Quote ]
Old 11-19-2012, 03:22 PM   #2
Apex Predator
 
Toxick's Avatar
 
Member Since: May 2003
Location: In your closet
Posts: 16,392


The idiom of cutting off your nose to spite your face comes close, but doesn't nail it.
__________________
yoroshiku onegai shimasu
I want to die like I was born. Screaming and covered in blood.
Toxick is offline   [ Reply w/Quote ]
Old 11-19-2012, 03:27 PM   #3
n/a
 
kwillia's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 2002
Posts: 40,844
She is at very high risk of getting breast cancer so I see no problem with her making that choice.


You guys need to keep in mind that even if you get smooshed religiously every year or even every six months you can still end up with breast cancer in between mamos. Why should she live with that constant fear and why should she leave herself at such a high risk of having to fight a battle her mother has already lost?

She will get reconstruction surgery giving her boobs you can continue to drool over and she no longer will have to live in fear that she has developed the same disease that killed her mother.
__________________
I believe in helping people who can’t help themselves. I do not believe in helping people who can help themselves. Instead of putting them on the dole, put them on the payroll.

Charlie Daniels
kwillia is offline   [ Reply w/Quote ]
Old 11-19-2012, 03:28 PM   #4
Stocki
 
stockgirl's Avatar
 
Member Since: Aug 2005
Posts: 2,210
If she carries a gene that could cause her to have breast cancer, then why not lose her tits?
__________________
IGNORANT VOTERS SUCK !

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chasey_Lane View Post
Twinkies can outlast a nuclear holocaust but not a 2nd Obama term...
stockgirl is offline   [ Reply w/Quote ]
Old 11-19-2012, 03:46 PM   #5
Jam out with ur clam out
 
ICit's Avatar
 
Member Since: Apr 2008
Location: In my world
Posts: 10,002
Quote:
Originally Posted by kwillia View Post
She is at very high risk of getting breast cancer so I see no problem with her making that choice.


You guys need to keep in mind that even if you get smooshed religiously every year or even every six months you can still end up with breast cancer in between mamos. Why should she live with that constant fear and why should she leave herself at such a high risk of having to fight a battle her mother has already lost?

She will get reconstruction surgery giving her boobs you can continue to drool over and she no longer will have to live in fear that she has developed the same disease that killed her mother.
very well said!!!

this is not uncommon now.
__________________
Some people are like Slinkies.... not really good for anything,
but you still can't help but smile when you see one tumble down the stairs.
ICit is offline   [ Reply w/Quote ]
Old 11-19-2012, 03:59 PM   #6
UnStAbLe YeT sAfE
 
pearlie369's Avatar
 
Member Since: Dec 2005
Location: Somewhere far far away from you...
Posts: 137
Good for her. If that is what will make her feel happy, safe and secure then say good bye to the girls. I honestly would probably decline the reconstruction surgery if I were in the same position. I have always been amply endowed and think that walking around topless and never seeing a bra or underwire again would be wonderful.
__________________
I watched it on TV, so yes, I was there.
pearlie369 is offline   [ Reply w/Quote ]
Old 11-19-2012, 04:03 PM   #7
professional daydreamer
 
mAlice's Avatar
 
Member Since: Mar 2001
Location: Wonderland
Posts: 33,709
What is it that you find disturbing?
__________________
#### you. I have enough friends.

Sugar Gliders are high maintenance. Please do not purchase/adopt before researching. They require a specialized diet, lots of your time, lots of room, and vet bills can be high. They can live to 15+ years.
mAlice is offline   [ Reply w/Quote ]
Old 11-19-2012, 04:23 PM   #8
Registered User
 
MMM_donuts's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2011
Posts: 1,557
I personally wouldn't have gone that route since she merely has a greater chance of developing breast cancer than someone without the gene (as opposed to a more definite chance) and because a mastectomy doesn't actually eliminate her chances of developing breast cancer but that's just my personal opinion. I don't think you could necessarily blame the girl for doing what she thinks is best for her life and body. She's about to embark on a pretty scary little journey.


If this is a ploy to help further her career, it's kinda genius.
__________________
Cleverly disguised as a responsible adult.
MMM_donuts is online now   [ Reply w/Quote ]
Old 11-19-2012, 04:29 PM   #9
Registered User
 
Member Since: Nov 2008
Posts: 510
Quote:
Originally Posted by mAlice View Post
What is it that you find disturbing?
Ignoring reasonable options other than self mutilation:

http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j...nb0Dyw&cad=rja
Your article provides a disappointing, unscientific response to the very important bra/cancer controversy. There was a study that came out of Harvard in 1991 showing bra-free women had a much lower rate of breast cancer. (Eur J Cancer. 1991;27(2):131-5). Then there was Dressed to Kill and the 1991-93 Bra and Breast Cancer Study by medical anthropologists Singer and Grismaijer. There are innumerable doctors now informing their patients to stop wearing tight bras, especially 24/7. And even the American Cancer Society is telling post-mastectomy women to avoid tight bras since they cause lymphedema.


per Dr. Mercola
Many physicians and researchers now agree that wearing a tight fitting bra can cut off lymph drainage, which can contribute to the development of breast cancer,[1] as your body will be less able to excrete all the toxins you’re exposed to on a daily basis. Aluminum from antiperspirants, for example, is one potentially dangerous source of toxins that can accumulate if your lymph drainage is impaired.

Says Dr. Michael Schacter, M.D. in his article, The Prevention and Complementary Treatment of Breast Cancer[2]:

"Over 85 percent of the lymph fluid flowing from the breast drains to the armpit lymph nodes. Most of the rest drains to the nodes along the breast bone. Bras and other external tight clothing can impede flow.

The nature of the bra, the tightness, and the length of time worn, will all influence the degree of blockage of lymphatic drainage. Thus, wearing a bra might contribute to the development of breast cancer as a result of cutting off lymphatic drainage, so that toxic chemicals are trapped in the breast."
Can Wearing Your Bra Cause Cancer?

Others label the above as MYTHS and should be ignored. Usually by organizations that profit from the cancer industry and they don't want people to know how important lymphatic drainage is to the body. Of course let's not fund a double blind study to really find out,

Oh, I just forgot,
I have testicular cancer history in my family. Excuse me while I go look for the scissors!
MadDogMarine is online now   [ Reply w/Quote ]
Old 11-19-2012, 04:30 PM   #10
Strung Out
 
Larry Gude's Avatar
 
Member Since: Feb 2001
Posts: 63,377
Quote:
Originally Posted by kwillia View Post
She is at very high risk of getting breast cancer so I see no problem with her making that choice.


You guys need to keep in mind that even if you get smooshed religiously every year or even every six months you can still end up with breast cancer in between mamos. Why should she live with that constant fear and why should she leave herself at such a high risk of having to fight a battle her mother has already lost?

She will get reconstruction surgery giving her boobs you can continue to drool over and she no longer will have to live in fear that she has developed the same disease that killed her mother.
Exactly. Doctor friend of mine told me, when he and I were talking about breast cancer when my sister got sick, that they, docs, take the view that, if you are at risk, in the higher risk categories, they'd cut 'em off in a heartbeat even if it only helped their odds of not getting cancer by 1%.

This is a simple matter of knowledge; knowing what she is facing and making an informed, intelligent decision.

__________________
"...When law and morality contradict each other, the citizen has the cruel alternative of either losing his moral sense or losing his respect for the law. These two evils are of equal consequence, and it would be difficult for a person to choose between them."

Frédéric Bastiat
Larry Gude is offline   [ Reply w/Quote ]
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:37 AM.

SEO by vBSEO 3.6.0 ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.