Paging idiot BigBlue and other gun control freaks

[Baja28 (Premo)]

See how well these laws work? Moron.
Firemen Shooter Already Barred From Owning Guns

[Lurk]

Originally Posted by Baja28

See how well these laws work? Moron.
Firemen Shooter Already Barred From Owning Guns

The operative word is "own" in this story. Nothing to prevent him from "possessing","borrowing","misusing","firing", etc.

[glhs837]

Originally Posted by Lurk

The operative word is "own" in this story. Nothing to prevent him from "possessing","borrowing","misusing","firing", etc.

Except offing his subhuman butt back in 80 when they should have.

[blazinlow89]

Originally Posted by Baja28

See how well these laws work? Moron.
Firemen Shooter Already Barred From Owning Guns

Wrong if gun laws had been stricter it would not be possible to obtain the weapon. Just like gun free zones prevent guns from being illegal transported across such areas.

You can't talk sense to these people.

[Lurk]

Originally Posted by glhs837

Except offing his subhuman butt back in 80 when they should have.

I realize you are having a difficult time turning loose of your bible and firearms but you really do need to calm down and give this some thoughtful inspection. Had the government offed this miserable POS after the brutal murder of his aged grandmother, it is true he would not have been around to set his neighborhood on fire and then snipe the first-responders as they drove into his neighborhood.

Now this will be hard for you to comprehend but give it a chance. Killing the guy in 1980 would not have prevented the manufacture of his firearms, all of which would conspire to locate then jump into the empty arms of some other idiot and force him to kill some other innocents in his neighborhood.

So, you see, it's a simple fact that guns kill but they only need a human to facilitate their actions. It's a lot like CHRISTINE, only without the antifreeze.

[itsbob]

Originally Posted by Lurk

The operative word is "own" in this story. Nothing to prevent him from "possessing","borrowing","misusing","firing", etc.

Actually you're wrong..

This convicted felon can not own, possess, carry or have on his person ANY firearm.

But nice try.

[glhs837]

Originally Posted by Lurk

I realize you are having a difficult time turning loose of your bible and firearms but you really do need to calm down and give this some thoughtful inspection. Had the government offed this miserable POS after the brutal murder of his aged grandmother, it is true he would not have been around to set his neighborhood on fire and then snipe the first-responders as they drove into his neighborhood.

Now this will be hard for you to comprehend but give it a chance. Killing the guy in 1980 would not have prevented the manufacture of his firearms, all of which would conspire to locate then jump into the empty arms of some other idiot and force him to kill some other innocents in his neighborhood.

So, you see, it's a simple fact that guns kill but they only need a human to facilitate their actions. It's a lot like CHRISTINE, only without the antifreeze.

(holdonwhileigoborrowbothofthose)

Ah, I get it now. Hmmm, so basically, your saying as long as there are humans, there will be an issue. So, we are going to have to execute everyone to make this a safer place? Get to work on the plans, I'll review them later

[retiredweaxman]

Originally Posted by Lurk

I realize you are having a difficult time turning loose of your bible and firearms but you really do need to calm down and give this some thoughtful inspection. Had the government offed this miserable POS after the brutal murder of his aged grandmother, it is true he would not have been around to set his neighborhood on fire and then snipe the first-responders as they drove into his neighborhood.

Now this will be hard for you to comprehend but give it a chance. Killing the guy in 1980 would not have prevented the manufacture of his firearms, all of which would conspire to locate then jump into the empty arms of some other idiot and force him to kill some other innocents in his neighborhood.

So, you see, it's a simple fact that guns kill but they only need a human to facilitate their actions. It's a lot like CHRISTINE, only without the antifreeze.

Are you recommending we do something like England and ban all weapons? If so, here is an article for you to read through. It was written Dec 11, 2012 so it is recent. You will see in the article, the author has made a mistake...went back and corrected the mistake (but I believe you will hate the numbers).

Gun Crime Soars in England Where Guns Are Banned - Katie Pavlich

[glhs837]

He was joking, RW:)

[PsyOps (Premo)]

Originally Posted by itsbob

Actually you're wrong..

This convicted felon can not own, possess, carry or have on his person ANY firearm.

But nice try.

I think this is a matter of semantics. By the law he is prohibited from owning firearms (cannot). But it’s impossible to enforce with 100% certainty (can).