"Why do you NEED an assault rifle"?

[mus]

Originally Posted by itsbob

Well, here you go

http://www.nytimes.com/2005/06/28/po...otus.html?_r=0

Feel free to learn something, like SCOTUS has found several times, that there is no expectation, nor duty for the police to protect individuals.

That's pretty weak. Hey, you're making my point for me. I/People learn from the debate, the argument, not some obscure article from eight years ago. You have to be open to the possibility of learning something from the argument. I don't think that is the case with you.

It's a learning process. If you think you have all the answers, you've already lost.

[MMDad]

Originally Posted by thatguy

Wirelessly posted



When talking about the founders and their intentions you can't ignore that they restricted an entire race from having any of their rights. That didn't change for nearly a century. You might not feel like there were inherent limits on the rights of black people under the founders, but I am sure hey would have argued differently. That is if they were lucky enough to be allowed to even argue.

That is a lie. More poo flinging from monkey boy. Or is making up facts how you "debate?"

[Inkd]

Originally Posted by MMDad

That is a lie. More poo flinging from monkey boy. Or is making up facts how you "debate?"

Keep going if you want, I've made my points and I'm done.

[MMDad]

Originally Posted by mus

You see Bobby, the benefit of a debate is that each person learns something. I do. I don't claim to know much, but when someone like yourself comes along and tells me what I need to do before I can participate, well...you can imagine how that makes me feel.

Actually, an honest debate would not involve you pulling out an old MPD to hide behind.

[MMDad]

Originally Posted by mus

That's pretty weak. Hey, you're making my point for me. I/People learn from the debate, the argument, not some obscure article from eight years ago. You have to be open to the possibility of learning something from the argument. I don't think that is the case with you.

It's a learning process. If you think you have all the answers, you've already lost.

What do you think has changed about guns in eight short years?

NY Times is obscure? It's the gun grabbers bible!

[itsbob]

Originally Posted by mus

That's pretty weak. Hey, you're making my point for me. I/People learn from the debate, the argument, not some obscure article from eight years ago. You have to be open to the possibility of learning something from the argument. I don't think that is the case with you.

It's a learning process. If you think you have all the answers, you've already lost.

I've pointed you to there different court rulings, this being the most current, in regards to the duty and responsibly of the police.

sooooo in reality you aren't here to learn, just communicate your wrong opinion, and get out your misinformation.

There is no such thing as an outdated SCOTUS ruling if it is the latest ruling in the matter. Not only was that 8 year old ruling the latest, but it strengthened earlier rulings that had either the same findings, our were made in lower courts

But keep trying, you may hurt one of my feelings yet. Got anything else? Anything nasty to say about my mom maybe?

[thatguy]

Wirelessly posted

Originally Posted by MMDad

That is a lie. More poo flinging from monkey boy. Or is making up facts how you "debate?"

The why don't you explain how slavery provided blacks the right under our constitution instead of doing your normal poo flinging from a glass house?

[BOP]

Originally Posted by Larry Gude

There is no need to go that far. Everything in the bill of rights speaks to the rights of the individual. Declaration of Independence is not about the rights of a state or a militia, of groups being created equal or of groups having the right to life, liberty and pursuit of happiness.

It is ALL about the individual, the citizen, and to bastardize the whole thing, to argue that this ONE amendment is about some group, some thing, is absurdity well past farce.

If we do play that game, try this on for size;



...could read as;

"A well educated community being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and read books shall not be infringed."

We're not talking about a ####ing library and we're not talking about using only comic books because it's less words and we're not talking about keeping them under lock and key.

Exactly right. And since we're on the subject, sort of, once a tyrannical regime disarms the populace, who are ALWAYS the people they start rounding up first?

If you said "the intellectuals," buy yourself a cigar.

[Baja28 (Premo)]

Originally Posted by Inkd

Keep going if you want, I've made my points and I'm done.

Ahhhhhh so Inkd is thatguy's MPD... oopsy!

[thatguy]

Wirelessly posted

Originally Posted by Baja28

Ahhhhhh so Inkd is thatguy's MPD... oopsy!

That's pretty funny, wrong but funny. Try actually reading for context