What difference, indeed... - Page 2

itsbob · 01-23-2013, 10:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hank

Iraq was no threat. Our soldiers died for money... final CIA report said zero......and you are my favorite thug!

THREAT or not would be based on perspective.

WWII Germany wasn't really a threat to the US, however if you were a Jew anywhere in Europe, i think they were a threat..

Saddam even admitted to lying and providing tge perception of having WMDs to keep his neighbors at bay....

His deception worked too good...

MMDad · 01-23-2013, 10:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by daileyck1

So the Google search you directed me to comes up with right wing web sites and Wikipedia. FAIL

If you're going to lie, at least make it believable. New York Times is right wing? Really? In what alternate reality does that happen?

Hank · 01-23-2013, 10:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MMDad

Even if that was true, does that somehow make it right for them to lie about the video?

Absolutely not. I don't discriminate! I hate both sides and don't trust our government at all.

BOP · 01-24-2013, 04:30 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hank

Iraq was no threat. Our soldiers died for money... final CIA report said zero......and you are my favorite thug!

Yeah? Well, apparently thousands of Iraqi and Kurdish civilians who were tortured and murdered by Saddam disagree with you.

*Bann* ^(Premo) · 01-24-2013, 06:37 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by vraiblonde

The Secretary of State says, what difference does it make why our diplomatic compounds were attacked?

Nice.

Clinton Shouts: 'What Difference ... Does It Make?' | The Weekly Standard

It was more fun watching Condi take the heat, wasn't it, Hillary?

I know, right?

I saw the soundbite of that on the news last night & again this morning. She looked & sounded like a pizzed off shrew. It's as if she was amazed at the audacity of the unwashed masses daring to question the queen.

Vince · 01-24-2013, 07:07 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bann

I know, right?

I saw the soundbite of that on the news last night & again this morning. She looked & sounded like a pizzed off shrew. It's as if she was amazed at the audacity of the unwashed masses daring to question the queen.

Get ready, she'll be running for Pres in 2016.

vraiblonde · 01-24-2013, 07:12 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by daileyck1

So the Google search you directed me to comes up with right wing web sites and Wikipedia. FAIL

Are you wearing a helmet? Wouldn't want you to get hurt.

*GURPS* ^(Premo) · 01-24-2013, 08:06 AM

Hillary’s irrelevant testimony, WMD intel and Matt Ryan

No intel could have proven that Saddam had no WMD and no words from the Secretary of State’s lips can render her incompetent performance competent

Matt Ryan is a generally competent NFL quarterback who has led my Atlanta Falcons to their best consecutive seasons’ run since he took over for Michael Vick five years ago. But I saw his two turnovers in the second half of their NFC Championship Game loss to the San Francisco 49ers last Sunday. No post-game news conference can change the fact of his responsibility (and those of other teammates) for the failure of his team to reach the Super Bowl.

What has this to do with Hillary Clinton’s testimony before the House Foreign Affairs and Senate Foreign Relations Committees today, much less the ancient story of false intel on WMD stockpiles in Iraq before our 2003 invasion? With respect to the latter, it is next to impossible to prove a negative, so that, especially after 9/11, a lack of intelligence identifying the presence of WMD in Iraq could not have outweighed the public behavior of Saddam Hussein consistent with the presence of such weapons coupled with the risk that he would use them again, as he had in the past.

With respect to the former, Secretary Clinton is no Matt Ryan. For the record, the Falcons have gone 56-24 (57-28 counting playoff games) since Ryan took over as a rookie starting QB in 2008. By contrast, what is Mrs. Bill Clinton’s public record since going pro?