Nice little speech by Bushy today

[vraiblonde]

Originally Posted by Kerad

Just so I can save you some effort next time...I immediately stop reading posts that lead off with that.

Then go ahead. Because that's what they are, and if you have a problem calling things what they are, then you should probably not read anything that doesn't align with what you already believe.

[vraiblonde]

Kerad, just to set it straight:

Nobody is saying that the Democrats as a whole are pro-terrorist. If you're defensive about that, then you need to ask yourself why.

Soros and the MoveOn crowd are definitely Leftists and anti-American - you merely have to read what they write to see it crystal clear. It so happens that the Democrats are majorly funded by these people. If the Dems do not like being lumped in with pro-terrorist Leftists, then they should consider not working for them.

[Larry Gude (Premo)]

Originally Posted by SamSpade

If I recall correctly, the metaphor wasn't used to mean "correct the strategy" but more along the lines of "get the hell out now".

...but my answer to frustration, and most GOP'ers, with W has not been cut and run; it has been kill OBL yesterday which helps with the PR not to mention KILLING our #1 bad guy, let the Iraqi's keep and bear arms and make sure they have jobs; not hand outs and get rid of azzhats like Sadr and co.

[Larry Gude (Premo)]

Originally Posted by Kerad

This isn't about Soros. As much as I ridicule FOX "News"...I don't blame Rupert Murdoch.

Anybody that plays the "Democrats are pro-terrorism" loses pretty much all credibility they may or may not have had.

...murdoch ever take OBL's side over the US??????????????????

Hillary, to her credit, talks tough about defending the US. I even heard Mr. Uh himself, Obama, use the word 'kill' once regarding terrorists, but not move on and not Soro's and not an awful lot of leading Dems including that dickwad from Connecticut, or Al Sharpton, Jesse, Kucinich, the piece of work from Alaska and for sure not the Brecht girl.

You can say someone loses credibility for pointing out how much many Democrats say the same things OBL does and you can ignore that OBL's latest screed sounds like something out of DLC headquarters. And I might, too because that is a whole lot easier than explaining it.

[Kerad (Premo)]

Originally Posted by Mikeinsmd

Yep "favourite"

Occasionally I forget my audience and throw in some "u"s. Colour, favourite, honour, etc. Not that I spent the majority of my life overseas or anything...I just spend lots of time communicating with an Australian friend...and over the years I've picked up some of that.

[Kerad (Premo)]

Originally Posted by vraiblonde

Kerad, just to set it straight:

Nobody is saying that the Democrats as a whole are pro-terrorist. If you're defensive about that, then you need to ask yourself why.

Soros and the MoveOn crowd are definitely Leftists and anti-American - you merely have to read what they write to see it crystal clear. It so happens that the Democrats are majorly funded by these people. If the Dems do not like being lumped in with pro-terrorist Leftists, then they should consider not working for them.

No worries...say what you want. Just don't get all when someone refers to Republicans as Nazis. Same thing.

[Larry Gude (Premo)]

Originally Posted by Kerad

No worries...say what you want. Just don't get all when someone refers to Republicans as Nazis. Same thing.

...unless you know about as much about Naziism as you seem to know about what George Soro's stands for and articulates.

[Kerad (Premo)]

Originally Posted by Larry Gude

...unless you know about as much about Naziism as you seem to know about what George Soro's stands for and articulates.

...and if you're defensive about that, then you need to ask yourself why.

[Larry Gude (Premo)]

Originally Posted by Kerad

...and if you're defensive about that, then you need to ask yourself why.

...interesting defense mechanism you got there. Home made?

[SamSpade]

Originally Posted by Kerad

...and if you're defensive about that, then you need to ask yourself why.

Why would James Clyburn then say that if the surge WORKED, it would be "a real problem for the Democrats".

Try to think about what that means - if a tactic to WIN THE WAR succeeded, it would pose a PROBLEM. Why would a winning tactic be bad?