Nice little speech by Bushy today

[Kerad]

Originally Posted by Larry Gude

...interesting defense mechanism you got there. Home made?

Defense mechanism??? Nah...that's just something I picked up along the way. My defense mechanism is my frickin' laser beams...not some forum post.

[Larry Gude (Premo)]

Originally Posted by Kerad

Defense mechanism??? Nah...that's just something I picked up along the way. My defense mechanism is my frickin' laser beams...not some forum post.

...you'd make a good GOP nazi. Come join us and we'll go wipe out some widows and orphans. See how good you aim is. If you are OK, we'll hit the old folks home this weekend.

[PsyOps]

Originally Posted by vraiblonde

I hope with all my heart and soul that Bush ends up dumping this in President Shrillary's lap. She's so smart and knows everything, fix it, baby!

You know what her solution is. She wants to END, not WIN, this war.

[Kerad]

Originally Posted by SamSpade

Why would James Clyburn then say that if the surge WORKED, it would be "a real problem for the Democrats".

Try to think about what that means - if a tactic to WIN THE WAR succeeded, it would pose a PROBLEM. Why would a winning tactic be bad?

I don't know (or care) why James Clyburn says anything he says. Never heard of him, and he doesn't speak for me.

I (along with other Democrats) have often said I wish President Bush was right about everything when it comes to Iraq. I would happily trade having to say "Oooops, my bad!" in this forum if it meant we invaded Iraq for the reasons we were told....or if the surge produced the intended results. I would much rather have had my opinions about George Bush changed instead of reinforced.

[SamSpade]

Originally Posted by PsyOps

You know what her solution is. She wants to END, not WIN, this war.

In all fairness, there's only two outcomes to war.

1. You win.
2. They win.

If you don't win a war, you lose it.

[SamSpade]

Originally Posted by Kerad

I don't know (or care) why James Clyburn says anything he says. Never heard of him, and he doesn't speak for me.

Ah, well he's the House Majority Whip, third ranking Democrat behind Pelosi (Speaker) and Hoyer (Majority Leader).

[Kerad]

Originally Posted by SamSpade

Ah, well he's the House Majority Whip, third ranking Democrat behind Pelosi (Speaker) and Hoyer (Majority Leader).

Okay.

Of course now that I've learned something new....that means I've lost some information I had stored.















Who the heck are you people?

[PsyOps]

Originally Posted by Kerad

Bush is doing all he can to just hold on until he's out of office..and it's not his problem. His legacy is f****d anyways...so what the heck???

His legacy hasn't been written yet; except by you defestists that are bent on failure for your political success. We wont know this legacy until about 5-10 years down the road and Iraq's fate is better defined. If Iraq falls so does Bush's legacy. If Iraq rises up to become a standard of democracy in the mideast his legacy will reflect that (IF the media allows it of course).

[PsyOps]

Originally Posted by SamSpade

In all fairness, there's only two outcomes to war.

1. You win.
2. They win.

If you don't win a war, you lose it.

Explain that to the liberals in charge of our congress that are only aimed at ending it. You do not hear the word "victory" or "win" in their rhetoric.

[Larry Gude (Premo)]

Originally Posted by SamSpade

In all fairness, there's only two outcomes to war.

1. You win.
2. They win.

If you don't win a war, you lose it.

...you

3. Korea