Quote:
Originally Posted by Bruzilla  You're on Larry my man!
I disagree with you on Obama. Yes, he made a big splash at first, then his support started to wain as the Clinton machine kicked in and he flubbed up some comments. But now you're hearing more and more about a rising surge of support for Obama, that's growing slowly but steadilly. All of Dean's support came from the media and that doesn't translate to votes, and I'm seeing the same thing with Hillary. It's taken Obama months to make significant changes to his standing, where as Hillary's changes over the course of two days. The former of these changes represents real people who vote, and the later represents smoke & mirrors BS from the MSM. |
...if nothing else we do see it 180 degrees out.
Obama, to me, doesn't even have Deans advantage of having actually governed. I look at races from the middle and I ain't seeing a middle that is going to be very comfortable with a guy who says 'um' every other word and says an awful lot of things he seems to have to go back and explain.
I think him beating Hillary would tear apart the Democrat power structure akin to what Humphrey and Carter did.
It will be interesting!
LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks
Digg this Thread!
Add Thread to del.icio.us
Bookmark in Technorati
Furl this Thread!
Add Thread to Facebook