Supreme Court Justice Bill Clinton

[Bustem' Down]

Originally Posted by CNN

WASHINGTON (CNN) -- It is a title that would be sure to bring either fear or cheer to many Americans, depending on your political leanings: Supreme Court Justice Bill Clinton.


If Hillary Clinton becomes president, would she nominate her husband for the high court?

That provocative possibility has long been whispered in legal and political circles ever since Sen. Hillary Clinton became a viable candidate for the Democratic presidential nomination.

Now a respected conservative law professor has openly predicted a future President Clinton would name her husband to the high court if a vacancy occurred.

If Clinton wins, would Justice Clinton be far behind? - CNN.com

Now there's a scary possibility.

[huntr1]

Originally Posted by Bustem' Down

If Clinton wins, would Justice Clinton be far behind? - CNN.com

Now there's a scary possibility.

Lee Harvey Huntr.


















































NOTE TO THE FEDS: I'm JUST KIDDING. No need to come bust down my doors.

[forestal]

And it's a very real possibility because Dubya and his Republican cronies have gone so far to the right he's off the scale and people are ready to vote for any alternative, even Hillary.

Originally Posted by Bustem' Down

If Clinton wins, would Justice Clinton be far behind? - CNN.com

Now there's a scary possibility.

[Larry Gude (Premo)]

Originally Posted by forestal

And it's a very real possibility because Dubya and his Republican cronies have gone so far to the right he's off the scale and people are ready to vote for any alternative, even Hillary.

...given any thought to the idea that you may have no clue what 'to the right' actually means?

There is a huge amount of frustration and anger towards Bush from people 'on the right', especially folks who are pretty far to the right.

The entire 'neo-con' component of his administration, which you have railed about numerous times, as have real 'righties', and like policies are, by definition, centrist and decidedly not 'to the right'.

It's not that I think you even want to have actual conversation, but, I still point these things out in the simple interest of being correct.

[ImnoMensa]

This would be the ultimate insult to America. To appoint a Justice to the court who lost his license to practice because of perjury.

Not likely to happen ,because Clinton isnt likely to win.

[vraiblonde]

Originally Posted by ImnoMensa

This would be the ultimate insult to America. To appoint a Justice to the court who lost his license to practice because of perjury.

That's what I was wondering. Clinton was disbarred from bringing cases to the Supreme Court - how would be be able to actually BE a Justice?

[Bustem' Down]

Originally Posted by vraiblonde

That's what I was wondering. Clinton was disbarred from bringing cases to the Supreme Court - how would be be able to actually BE a Justice?

Do you have to be a lawyer to be appojnted? I didn't think so.

[FromTexas]

Originally Posted by vraiblonde

That's what I was wondering. Clinton was disbarred from bringing cases to the Supreme Court - how would be be able to actually BE a Justice?

:presidentialpardon:

[Kyle]

Originally Posted by Larry Gude

...given any thought to the idea that you may have no clue what 'to the right' actually means?

You gotta remember, to Foreskin, Fidel is a Centrist.

[vraiblonde]

Originally Posted by FromTexas

:presidentialpardon:

Wow! Wouldn't that be a sweet little case of abuse of power if the Supremes make a decision and President Hillary overthrows it?

And Bustem, don't you have to be a judge already to get nominated to the Supreme Court? That's a real question because I'm not sure how it works and I'm too lazy to google.