Democrats in denial...

[Larry Gude (Premo)]

...Bill called Obama's campaign and the complete lack of media scrutiny a fairy tale. Obama alluded to Monica. Hillary's peeps made under their breathe comments about Barracks 'high times' in the neighborhood. Hill said LBJ is the man. Obama and company blew a gasket over the 'snub' of MLK.

Now, everyone is running around apologizing and trying to act like they are above it all while finger pointing and saying we should all get back to the 'issues' while getting in a parting shot and interjecting/not interjecting race and sex. And through all this the media are freaking out over how stupid they looked relying on polls so heavily in New Hampshire while trying to comment on this Keystone Cops routine.

These people actually want to pretend Bill is not a sexual predator, that Barrack wasn't into drugs, even though it's in HIS book, and that Hillary is Ms. Manners.

These are the people who actually want to lead this nation on Islamic terror, the economy, Social Security, illegal immigration and foreign policy?



What a hoot!

[vraiblonde]

Originally Posted by Larry Gude

...Bill called Obama's campaign and the complete lack of media scrutiny a fairy tale.

No. Bill said that Obama's position on Iraq was a fairytale, not his campaign.

[Larry Gude (Premo)]

Originally Posted by vraiblonde

No. Bill said that Obama's position on Iraq was a fairytale, not his campaign.

...excuse me. I certainly don't want to hurt Barracks feelings or misquote Bill.

[vraiblonde]

Originally Posted by Larry Gude

...excuse me. I certainly don't want to hurt Barracks feelings or misquote Bill.

Some Lefty would have come in here, corrected you, then tried to pretend that the rest of it was bunk because of that misstatement. Just trying to keep the forums safe for democracy.

[Larry Gude (Premo)]

Originally Posted by vraiblonde

Some Lefty would have come in here, corrected you, then tried to pretend that the rest of it was bunk because of that misstatement. Just trying to keep the forums safe for democracy.

...we should be it in a lock box for safekeeping?

[ImnoMensa]

I havent kept up that good on the Fairy tale story, but if Bill said Obama's position on
Iraq is a Fairy tale he is right.

His position that he can call up Iran and Syria and Palestine and have a beer and pleasant chat with them and solve all of the problems in the Middle east he is also having nocturnal emissions .

[Lenny]

Originally Posted by ImnoMensa

I havent kept up that good on the Fairy tale story, but if Bill said Obama's position on
Iraq is a Fairy tale he is right.

His position that he can call up Iran and Syria and Palestine and have a beer and pleasant chat with them and solve all of the problems in the Middle east he is also having nocturnal emissions .

Nope, nope, nope. No alcohol for dis buncha' guyz. But the wet dream, yeah, you're right on there.

[czygvtwkr]

Hillary was probably just impressed by LBJ's reputed equipment.

[SamSpade]

Originally Posted by vraiblonde

No. Bill said that Obama's position on Iraq was a fairytale, not his campaign.

Well I've said this before about Barack's boast about his opinion on Iraq - he held it so strongly without actually having to cast a vote on it. He had *nothing* to lose by holding that position.

I don't respect Hillary's tiptoeing around her vote much - her remarks over the years range from atacking Saddam with everything, to suggesting the data provided her was a deliberate lie, to - her ambiguous current position - she merely voted to give the President the "option" of going to war. It might not win her votes, and certainly not mine, but it would win my respect if she just came clean and said something like "with what we thought we knew at the time, I voted for the war because I thought it was the best thing for the security of this nation and the world. I was wrong, but I stand by my vote."

THAT, I would respect. I've always disliked her since the '92 campaign, but I would absolutely respect that.

But Obama's treatment of it, I don't respect at all - because for or against the war, his vote didn't mean scratch. Because he didn't have to risk his career saying he was against it. A lot of people were against it - Democrats are usually loathe to vote for a war no matter what. Ironically, a LOT MORE Democrats voted for this war than the last one - and everyone now thinks that not only was the right thing to do, but (in a bizarre twist of logic) we should have done then what we're doing now. But some of those guys who voted FOR this current war had to risk losing an election in 2002 (because that's when they voted). They had to balance their vote against their job.

Ok, it reeks of guile - but it's politics. You pass a welfare bill that makes you hold the vomit in your throat - because vetoing it will cost you an election.

Aside from the fact that Obama is all fluff and little substance - I'm amused at Bill's frustration with him.

He himself was the recipient of unmerited media fawning in '92. And he won a nomination as a result.

Maybe he DOES realize that.

Originally Posted by Larry Gude

These are the people who actually want to lead this nation on Islamic terror, the economy, Social Security, illegal immigration and foreign policy?



What a hoot!

Makes me happy we're spending so much time debating the critical issue of the imigration status of the landscapers. :)