Because they are not.

[tomchamp]

The cost of Roe at 35.

The cost of Roe at 35 - - The Washington Times, America's Newspaper

[cwo_ghwebb]

Originally Posted by tomchamp

The cost of Roe at 35.

The cost of Roe at 35 - - The Washington Times, America's Newspaper

Pretty depressing.

[tomchamp]

50 Million. Warren Burger..I hope he's with them all.

[Lenny]

Originally Posted by tomchamp

50 Million. Warren Burger..I hope he's with them all.

Don't you have that wrong? As innocents, the aborted have not been damned. Is that the same you hope for Warren?

Taking some of those 50 million babies out to account for the ones who were sick or killed to protect the mother, say about a million or so, that would have left four million babies being born. Since caring and loving mothers generally do not abort their kids, lets assume that most of those four million would have been born into uncaring adn unloving homes. Call me a pessimist, but I'm thinking that most of those four million would not have grown up to be hardworking wetback displacers. More likely many of them would grow up to be child molesters, welfare recipients, drug addicts, criminals, etc.

This is why I am pro-abortion. I would rather see the kid killed before birth than to have it raised by an unfit mother and have to worry about bumping into him on a dark street one night.

[Lenny]

Originally Posted by Bruzilla

Taking some of those 50 million babies out to account for the ones who were sick or killed to protect the mother, say about a million or so, that would have left four million babies being born. Since caring and loving mothers generally do not abort their kids, lets assume that most of those four million would have been born into uncaring adn unloving homes. Call me a pessimist, but I'm thinking that most of those four million would not have grown up to be hardworking....This is why I am pro-abortion.

Could it possibly be that you cannot figure that out that well? If you cannot subtract 1 million from 50 million without getting four million (several times), perhaps your calculations on the other issues are ill-founded too. Just wondering.

[tomchamp]

Originally Posted by Lenny

Don't you have that wrong? As innocents, the aborted have not been damned. Is that the same you hope for Warren?

I was wrong.
Warren will rot in hell without the babies.

[tomchamp]

Originally Posted by tomchamp

I was wrong.
Warren will rot in hell without the babies.

As will the aborters.