President's approval rating Sags

[Clare Whitbeck]

Originally posted by Ken King
Okay, finally got to the blank pages. Unsure of what they could possibvly state as they are truly blank with about 10 to 15 words remaining on the 28 pages. .

The New York Times had an article containing information from people who supposedly have seen the pages (no quotes). If you are interested, and if someone will tell me how to include an attachment, I'll send it along.
Clare

[Kain99]

Clare... I'd like to see it. Above the text box you will see an http:// button.

Click http:// In the first box type a line of text. "This is what I promised" etc.

When the second box appears delete the http:// that appears in the box.

Then paste the link.

[Ken King (Premo)]

Why not just type the URL, select the check button below the text box saying "Automatically parse URLs: automatically adds and around internet addresses."

[Ken King (Premo)]

Originally posted by Clare Whitbeck
The New York Times had an article containing information from people who supposedly have seen the pages (no quotes). If you are interested, and if someone will tell me how to include an attachment, I'll send it along.
Clare

Is this it: http://www.nytimes.com/2003/07/26/national/26SAUD.html
Or this one: http://www.nytimes.com/reuters/news/...elligence.html

[Clare Whitbeck]

It's the first one. Thanks for your help.
Clare

[Kain99]

Originally posted by Ken King
Why not just type the URL, select the check button below the text box saying "Automatically parse URLs: automatically adds and around internet addresses."

Cause... that would make it easy.

[Ken King (Premo)]

Originally posted by Clare Whitbeck
The New York Times had an article containing information from people who supposedly have seen the pages (no quotes). If you are interested, and if someone will tell me how to include an attachment, I'll send it along.
Clare

The 28 missing pages? As the report states the information in those pages was not tested for reliability or sufficiency. More importantly, for me, is that it was marked as highly classified and as such it shouldn’t be publicly discussed by those trusted to view it. I’m sure that there are reasons for the classification and thus the required protection of that material.

I have read reports before wondering as to why the information was classified. It wasn’t until it was taken into context with other bits of data that the reason became obvious. I already can imagine what some of those reasons are.

[Clare Whitbeck]

Now the Saudi's want the entire report released. Hmmm. Interesting.
Clare

[Ken King (Premo)]

Originally posted by Clare Whitbeck
Now the Saudi's want the entire report released. Hmmm. Interesting.
Clare

Probably so they can disprove the inaccurate information. Hell the team that put the report together said "this Joint Inquiry has made no final determinations as to the reliability or sufficiency of the information regarding these issues", why the hell was it even in there if they don't know if it is true?

[Clare Whitbeck]

Have you ever served on a committee where there was no agreement as to an issue? The language you described is the language you use if everbody can't agree. They didn't say the items weren't accurate either. They just chose not to say.
Now the Saudi's want them to say. As I said before, hmmmm.
Clare