Super Delegate Vote "For Sale" ???

[Starman3000m]

Originally Posted by Nucklesack

So its nefarious for an Elected Representitive to determine which Presidential Candidate will represent his constituents the best?

BUT he could do that without asking for Twenty Million Dollars to help him make his "determination".

[cwo_ghwebb]

Originally Posted by Nucklesack

So its nefarious for an Elected Representitive to determine which Presidential Candidate will represent his constituents the best?

For a set amount of cash, yes. This is one of the Democrats blind spots, IMO. This moral relativity. It's obvious to anyone who knows right from left, I mean, wrong.

He gets the money, he helps whoever gives him the money. He doesn't care if the other candidate is more qualified, more experienced or any of the factors which a person should consider regarding choosing a leader. He is saying he will choose the candidate who gives him the money.

I would consider that a bribe.

[Starman3000m]

Originally Posted by cwo_ghwebb

For a set amount of cash, yes. This is one of the Democrats blind spots, IMO. This moral relativity. It's obvious to anyone who knows right from left, I mean, wrong.

He gets the money, he helps whoever gives him the money. He doesn't care if the other candidate is more qualified, more experienced or any of the factors which a person should consider regarding choosing a leader. He is saying he will choose the candidate who gives him the money.

I would consider that a bribe.

Excellent Response!!! However, this may make too much sense for others to believe it.