Left and right in America...

[Larry Gude (Premo)]

Originally Posted by Kerad

Larry wanted to see evidence of "CHANGE". Obama's put it on his interim podium for everyone to see.


And that "unleashed" comment was for his benefit as well. But you've been sucked in...so enjoyit as if were all yours.




Happy Thanksgiving, all of you.

...no, I'd be happy to see a potus govern as he was elected to do so. Bush did NOT.

Happy thanksgiving to all as well!

[Larry Gude (Premo)]

Originally Posted by PsyOps

Wait a minute! The "right got hosed"? I thought you said they hosed themselves. So who hosed them Larry?

...would you agree that the right thought it had something...different...in George Bush when we voted for him? Or do you think he is pretty much what we expected?

[Bann (Premo)]

Originally Posted by Beaver-Cleaver

does this answer your question?

GSA - Presidential Transition Act of 1963



I found this on a website you righties frequent - Michelle Malkin:

Michelle Malkin » What the hell is the “Office of the President-Elect?” And why is it still attacking McCain?

Cut to the chase, Andy. I don't have time to read all that right now.

Obviously, there is such a position as a "president elect". Mostly we have referred to the podium and "official" seal of the president elect. It's not the same seal as are all the other "official" seals of the government officials who give their "official" speeches. Look up the SECDEF, SOS, or other such official seals - they all look similar to the official Presidential Seal. Not like the baby blue & cutesy "new age" graphics on the one Obama is using. It's the just hokey and presumptuous looking.

[cwo_ghwebb]

"Understand where the vision for change comes from, first and foremost," he said. "It comes from me. That's my job, to provide a vision in terms of where we are going and to make sure then that my team is implementing [that vision]."

The Messiah has spoken, now you Washington insider lackeys and lobbyists jump to it and figure out how to get it accomplished!

When will he take five loaves of bread and two fish and feed the nation?

Talk about Kool Aid!

[Larry Gude (Premo)]

Originally Posted by Kerad

I know you are chomping at the bit to point out Obama's flawed policies, but you're going to have to wait a bit until you can declare any of his future policies to be a failure. Or prove that he somehow misled the American people during his campaign.

...let me make this perfectly clear: There are things Barack Obama has said during the campaign, including his conversation with Bill O'Reilly, that make it profoundly evident that he is very intelligent and FAR superior intellectually to George Bush and things he's said that give me...hope...that he will act effectively and properly in the national interests of the United States.

However, HOWEVER, when I take him to task over some of his selections in people it has NOTHING to do with playing 'gotcha' with him; I WANT him to succeed. My issue is that many of these people, including Emmanuel, I do NOT see in their resume nor their rhetoric, I do NOT see them as being people who WILL act in what I see as the national interest of the nation and the American people. I see them as party HACKS.

I don't want him to be a hack. I WANT him to do well.

[PsyOps]

Originally Posted by Larry Gude

...would you agree that the right thought it had something...different...in George Bush when we voted for him? Or do you think he is pretty much what we expected?

You’re dragging me down this same old road of “But, bush turned out to be such a disappointment”. Bush disappointed me on so many different levels, but the one thing Bush didn’t disappoint me with is his focus to stay in the fight no matter how unpopular it got. I think it kept his country safe. We can beat him up all day long about how he screwed the Iraq war up and his out-of-control spending ; but not one bit of that is worth a damn to me without our security. He did that right. So what I thought I was voting for in ‘00 and ’04 is rather moot from that standpoint.

[toppick08 (Premo)]

Originally Posted by Kerad

How will you react if he turns out to be a pretty damn good President???

Like Boosh'.........good family man, that kept our ass from being attacked.....again.

[PsyOps]

Originally Posted by Larry Gude

...let me make this perfectly clear: There are things Barack Obama has said during the campaign, including his conversation with Bill O'Reilly, that make it profoundly evident that he is very intelligent and FAR superior intellectually to George Bush and things he's said that give me...hope...that he will act effectively and properly in the national interests of the United States.

However, HOWEVER, when I take him to task over some of his selections in people it has NOTHING to do with playing 'gotcha' with him; I WANT him to succeed. My issue is that many of these people, including Emmanuel, I do NOT see in their resume nor their rhetoric, I do NOT see them as being people who WILL act in what I see as the national interest of the nation and the American people. I see them as party HACKS.

I don't want him to be a hack. I WANT him to do well.

Define succeed. Do you want him to succeed at universal healthcare? How about ensuring the right of a “mother” to kill her failed aborted child? How about raising taxes on the “wealthy” (whoever that is on any particular day) and spreading that wealth? How about the fairness doctrine or pulling out of Iraq prematurely? How about invading Pakistan.

[PsyOps]

Originally Posted by Kerad

How will you react if he turns out to be a pretty damn good President???

Define pretty damn good.












see my previous post to Larry.