Letting a terrorist go?

[Vince]

Originally Posted by ItalianScallion

Where do you think they are released? Didn't you hear the news yesterday? A few of those released back to their country are right back in their old jobs with Al Qauida and guess what they're talking about doing?
1) Becoming Americans?
2) Telling the world how nice we were to them?
3) Plotting their dirty/nuclear bomb strategy?
Great job Barak-al-haji-hussein-hadeem-sotero!

Get used to it. We have 4 years of Obamites and their liberal agenda. If our country is intact after the next 4 years, maybe those that voted for him will have learned something, but I doubt it.

[ylexot (Premo)]

Originally Posted by mitzi

I read about the crimes he committed in the 70s and I thought he was sentenced then or either I'm confusing him with another terrorist. I was wrong about that. Regardless, the current President has nothing to do with his release. I agree though, he shouldn't be given an early release.

Yeah, I got confused by the snippet in the original post too. He's only half-way through his sentence.

[Pushrod]

Come on you guys, we have to be compassionate and extend a hand of friendship to terrorist and terrorist sponsering states, that is the only way we will get them to like us.
[/sarcasm]

Originally Posted by ItalianScallion

All of them.
Let me ask you: How many terrorists can we afford to let go so they can go back to their country to fight against us?

How many innocent people are we holding in prisons and keeping away from their families?

This is a war that will never end.

Freedom, responsibility and justice all thrown away because Righties are skeered of third world ragheads.

[ItalianScallion (Premo)]

Originally Posted by mitzi

I read about the crimes he committed in the 70s and I thought he was sentenced then or either I'm confusing him with another terrorist. I was wrong about that. Regardless, the current President has nothing to do with his release. I agree though, he shouldn't be given an early release.

Originally Posted by ylexot

Yeah, I got confused by the snippet in the original post too. He's only half-way through his sentence.

4 given.

Originally Posted by Vince

Get used to it. We have 4 years of Obamites and their liberal agenda. If our country is intact after the next 4 years, maybe those that voted for him will have learned something, but I doubt it.

He goes against almost everything I believe in. It's impossible to get used to it. He's done more damage in his first 5 days than most have done in their entire term (Jimmy Carter excepted).

Originally Posted by Beaver-Cleaver

How many innocent people are we holding in prisons and keeping away from their families?
This is a war that will never end.
Freedom, responsibility and justice all thrown away because Righties are skeered of third world ragheads.

First off, your definition of innocent is wrong. No one is innocent if they are at war with us. Even their families are considered the enemy.
This war could end if you libs (Bush included) would stop fighting it like it is a "one day at a time" war. WWII could have gone on for decades if Truman hadn't done what he did. We need to do the same today. Only a complete IDIOT (Obama) would think that you can negotiate with terrorists.
And "righties are scared of ragheads"? Not hardly! You libs are scared of them. If you weren't, you'd have voted to end this war quickly and decisively by emptying our military weapons arsenals on them and coming home tomorrow. The Nazi Pelosi and her counterparts wouldn't allow it because "innocent people would get hurt" she said. Glad there were no innocent people in the World Trade Center buildings right?.......

Originally Posted by ItalianScallion

First off, your definition of innocent is wrong. No one is innocent if they are at war with us. Even their families are considered the enemy.
This war could end if you libs (Bush included) would stop fighting it like it is a "one day at a time" war. WWII could have gone on for decades if Truman hadn't done what he did. We need to do the same today. Only a complete IDIOT (Obama) would think that you can negotiate with terrorists.
And "righties are scared of ragheads"? Not hardly! You libs are scared of them. If you weren't, you'd have voted to end this war quickly and decisively by emptying our military weapons arsenals on them and coming home tomorrow. The Nazi Pelosi and her counterparts wouldn't allow it because "innocent people would get hurt" she said. Glad there were no innocent people in the World Trade Center buildings right?.......

I thought you didn't drink.

Obama's not negotiating with terrorists, he's negotiating with elected leaders.

Ironically, Condi Rice did the same thing. I guess Condi's a lib as well.

[ItalianScallion (Premo)]

Originally Posted by Beaver-Cleaver

I thought you didn't drink.

Obama's not negotiating with terrorists, he's negotiating with elected leaders.

And their elected leaders aren't????????

[twinoaks207 (Premo)]

Sorry for confusing people by not posting more of the original article to make it clear that he was getting out early for good behavior. I always click on the article links to read the entire thing so it didn't occur to me that others wouldn't.

IMHO, anyone convicted of a terrorist act should certainly not get time off the sentence for good behavior. This guy seems to be a world-reknowned bomb expert -- just what we need to let loose on the world. In my perfect world, one of those "shadow" people would take him out before he hurts anyone else.

Unfortunately, my perfect world doesn't exist.

Carry on your arguments as you will, just had to add this little bit...

Originally Posted by ItalianScallion

And their elected leaders aren't????????

How many? Really?

Southern Lebanon because it's Hezbollah controlled. Lebanon is, for the most part, 2 different countries.

Gaza City under Hamas and the bordering nations rejected them during the Gaza City war.

Iraq oh wait that cant be we're in Iraq

Afghanistan (but we're in Afghanistan somebody waited 4 years to send more troops in to Afghanistab)

Pakistan but it sounds like President Obama (that's still cool to say) is taking care of them.

[ylexot (Premo)]

Originally Posted by Beaver-Cleaver

How many? Really?

Southern Lebanon because it's Hezbollah controlled. Lebanon is, for the most part, 2 different countries.

Gaza City under Hamas and the bordering nations rejected them during the Gaza City war.

Iraq oh wait that cant be we're in Iraq

Afghanistan (but we're in Afghanistan somebody waited 4 years to send more troops in to Afghanistab)

Pakistan but it sounds like President Obama (that's still cool to say) is taking care of them.

You forgot to mention Iran.