Southern Maryland Online - Serving Calvert, Charles, & St. Mary's Counties.  Click here to go to the Front Page of somd.com.
 
| Write Us | Help | Sponsors | Classifieds | Employment | Forums | MarketPlace | Calendar | Headlines | Announcements | Weather | More... |


Go Back   Southern Maryland Community Forums > General Interest > Politics
Register Blogs FAQ Members List Calendar Chat Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Wireless

Politics Democrat, Republican, Independent.  Liberal or conservative.  We're talking politics here!

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 05-03-2009, 05:03 PM   #1 (permalink)
No Use for Donk Twits
 
cwo_ghwebb's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jul 2005
Location: Costa Rica bound
Posts: 6,739
Why not use Card Check, Democrats?

Quote:
Senate Democrats have hit the roof after discovering that Harry Reid’s deal with Arlen Specter to get him to switch parties, especially allowing Specter to keep his seniority. The Senate Democratic Caucus has decided that Reid doesn’t have the last word on seniority and assignments and will take a vote on how to apply Specter’s seniority for committee assignments. And with Card Check on the table, they have selected a rather ironic process for that decision:
“We’re going to do as we do every new Congress and pass an organizational resolution that will determine where everybody stands and that will give him an opportunity to find out who his pals are in the Senate,” Reid said at a question-and-answer session sponsored by The National Journal Group.

Senior Democrats who could lose a plum committee or subcommittee post to Specter would almost certainly vote against granting the seniority that he would have been granted as a Democrat elected in 1980.

One senior lawmaker who spoke to The Hill on condition of anonymity said that Reid does not have the power to let Specter keep his seniority earned as a Republican.

“That can’t happen; seniority is decided by the caucus,” said the lawmaker, who said Specter’s place in the pecking order would be decided by secret ballot during the organizational meeting expected after the 2010 election.
Decided by secret ballot. Now, why would they need to do that? Why not just use the same process that the Democrats want to force on the American worker, where they have to publicly sign a card and make themselves accountable to their peers for their choice on whether to organize? Have the Democrats suddenly discovered the vakue of a secret ballot in keeping undue pressure out of the election process?
Hot Air » Blog Archive » Why not use Card Check, Democrats?

Good question.
__________________
I don't accept the false premise that I'm not the Messiah and I'm not infallible! - B.O.
cwo_ghwebb is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Add post to Facebook
[ Reply w/Quote ]
Old 05-03-2009, 05:55 PM   #2 (permalink)
You Lie!!!
 
chernmax's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jul 2006
Location: Displaced New Yorker in Southern MD
Posts: 10,315
The Democrats deserve Specter and the problems that come with it!!!
__________________
Photobucket
chernmax is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Add post to Facebook
[ Reply w/Quote ]
Old 05-03-2009, 05:58 PM   #3 (permalink)
Registered User
 
Rommey's Avatar
 
Member Since: Nov 2008
Posts: 475
Quote:
Originally Posted by cwo_ghwebb View Post
More "do-as-I-say-not-do-as-I-do" from our illustrious leaders.
__________________
Go back and search before you rock back that Pez dispenser of Stupid called a mouth. ~ Pete
Rommey is online now  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Add post to Facebook
[ Reply w/Quote ]
Old 05-04-2009, 07:27 AM   #4 (permalink)
RadioPatrol
 
Posts: n/a
Quote:
Originally Posted by cwo_ghwebb View Post


had an interesting town hall mtg about unions and potential unionization ....


it seems the union member ships is down to about 12% of the work force from an all time high of over 30% in 1945 ....

so the premise was, Unions are desperately trying to raise membership by any means .........

 
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Add post to Facebook
[ Reply w/Quote ]
Old 05-04-2009, 07:33 AM   #5 (permalink)
Strung Out
 
Larry Gude's Avatar
 
Member Since: Feb 2001
Posts: 43,303
Blog Entries: 1
Quote:
Originally Posted by cwo_ghwebb View Post
I would make the reverse argument; we are a nation that uses and believes in private ballots as a core measure of integrity and validity. If it's good enough for out representatives, why isn't it good enough for everyone? Why are workers not entitled to that same fundamental right?

The way you're framing this may suggest to some that there is some validity to card check. My argument is that the only validity is coercion.
__________________
TARP; A sturdy fabric used to cover things up.

Barack H. Obama; Speaker of power to truth

Larry Gude original
Larry Gude is online now  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Add post to Facebook
[ Reply w/Quote ]
Reply




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:15 PM.



| Home | Help | Contact Us | About somd.com | Privacy | Advertising | Sponsors | Newsletter |

| What's New | What's Cool | Top Rated | Add A Link | Mod a Link | Link to Us |

| Announcements | Bookstore | Chat | Calendar | Classifieds | Community |
| Contests & Surveys | Culture | Dating | Dining | Education | Employment | Entertainment |
| Forums | Free E-Mail | Games | Gear! | Government | Guestbook | Health | Marketplace | Mortgage | News |
| Organizations | Photos | Postcard | Real Estate | Relocation | Sports | Survey | Travel | Wiki | Weather | Worship |

Brought to you by Virtually Everything, Inc.   ©1996-2009, All rights reserved.


SEO by vBSEO 3.1.0 ©2007, Crawlability, Inc.