Liberal Taliban Issues Fatwa Against Miss Califor

[EmptyTimCup]

Liberal Taliban Issues Fatwa Against Miss California

by Ann Coulter (more by this author)
Posted 05/13/2009 ET
Updated 05/13/2009 ET

Not even Dick Cheney can incite the blood-curdling rage of liberals at the sight of a sexy Evangelical Christian. Paula Jones, Katherine Harris, Michele Bachmann, Sarah Palin and, most recently, Miss California, Carrie Prejean, have all come under a frenzy of attacks from liberals.

Christians are supposed to be fat, balding sweaty little men with bad complexions. It's liberals who are supposed to be the sexy ones. (I know that from watching "The West Wing" and all movies starring Julia Roberts.)

But sadly for liberals, in real life, the fat, balding sweaty little guy with the bad complexion is Perez Hilton and the smoking-hot babe is Carrie Prejean.

This apparent contradiction incites violent anger in liberals, triggering their famous "flight or flight" response. So liberal masturbators are, once again, launching furious attacks on a beautiful Christian in a fit of pique similar to the one directed at Joan of Arc.

You'd be better off in a real burqa than under the authority of a liberal American male.

I'm not sure we needed a psychological profile of Prejean to figure out why she holds the same position on gay marriage as: the president, the vice president, the secretary of state, Bill Clinton, John Kerry, John Edwards and his mistress, and the vast majority of the American people.

But what is crying out for an explanation is why every bubble-head TV news anchorette from a nice, churchgoing red state ends up adopting the political views of Karl Marx.

From Katie Couric on CBS to Norah O'Donnell on MSNBC, the whole stable of TV anchorettes weirdly have the exact same politics as their liberal masters. It's the ideological burqa women are required to wear to work in the mainstream media. As with a conventional burqa, it enforces conformity and severely restricts the vision.

The only way to protect yourself is to do the liberal male's bidding, as the bubble-head anchorettes do, or stand on the rock of Christianity.

Now, another beautiful Christian has thrown off the liberal burqa, thereby inciting mass hysteria throughout the liberal establishment. Prejean doesn't care. She is blazing across the sky, as impotent nose-pickers jockey for a piece of her reflected light by hurling insults at her.

[aps45819 (Premo)]

Second by an hour

[EmptyTimCup]

Originally Posted by aps45819

Second by an hour

yeah i saw that ....

[Mike (Premo)]

QUOTE=EmptyTimCup;3750642]

[size="2"]by Ann Coulter
[/quote]

Ann Coulter

Funny stuff. Liberals and other deviants won't get it.

[This_person]

Originally Posted by Nucklesack

While I agree that she's getting the rough end of the deal for having the same position on Gay Marriage that President Obama has, she is definetly not helping herself with her press conference (My Grandfather fought at the Battle of the Bulge) and her lame excuses about her topless photos.

It seems she's latching onto the Fire and Brimstoners, because they support her decision, not because she's some pious Christian martyr.

What do her modeling photos have to do with her position on same-gendered unions?

Originally Posted by This_person

What do her modeling photos have to do with her position on same-gendered unions?

He was talking about her pathetic sorry ass excuses.

... "on a windy day" -- the wind was strong enough to expose her breasts but it didn't move her hair. That's some kind of wind.

Her pathetic excuse about "Freedom of Speech" maybe? Freedom of Speech doesn't extend to a beauty pageant. Like all rights under the Bill of Rights, it is not 100% absolute.

Her holier than thou attitude when she has skeletons in her closet.

I felt bad for her at first -- in all fairness, she was asked about gay marriage.

But then she joined a political movement... that makes her a fair target.

Oh, and congratulations righties.

You've finally found someone to worship who's dumber than Palin.

[This_person]

Originally Posted by Beaver-Cleaver

He was talking about her pathetic sorry ass excuses.

... "on a windy day" -- the wind was strong enough to expose her breasts but it didn't move her hair. That's some kind of wind.

Her pathetic excuse about "Freedom of Speech" maybe? Freedom of Speech doesn't extend to a beauty pageant. Like all rights under the Bill of Rights, it is not 100% absolute.

Her holier than thou attitude when she has skeletons in her closet.

I felt bad for her at first -- in all fairness, she was asked about gay marriage.

But then she joined a political movement... that makes her a fair target.

Oh, I see, it wasn't the photos, it was the excuse for the photos.

What do the excuses for the photos have to do with her position on same gendered unions?

Now, another beautiful Christian has thrown off the liberal burqa, thereby inciting mass hysteria throughout the liberal establishment. Prejean doesn't care. She is blazing across the sky, as impotent nose-pickers jockey for a piece of her reflected light by hurling insults at her.

Sorry Annie, she signed up to be the face of a political movement organization. That makes her a fair target.

There's no way this can be compared to the vicious attacks on Bristol Palin. If St. Carrie didn't want to get burned, she shouldn't have played with fire.

[This_person]

Originally Posted by Nucklesack

Try re-reading the post. Her position on same-gendered unions is one thing. Her idiotic responses to her nude photo's being released is another ("I didnt know they were being taken" - even though she's looking right at the camera, "The wind blew my shirt open" - (both times) but didnt affect anything else (like her hair)).

Oh, I see, it wasn't the photos that were the problem, it was the excuses.

What do the excuses have to do with her position on same-gendered unions?

I dont care about the pictures except it shows her own hypocrisy, and that of Anne Coulter and other rightous blowhards who go after Moakler for posing in Playboy and ignore similiar pictures from poor wittle Carrie.

Actually, I think you have that backwards. I read Ann's column, and she specifically said the NSFW photos were non-Christianlike.

I think she, and others, are pointing out the hypocrisy of the leftists attacking Miss CA about her photos, but then claiming they want to be good role models (though they have more explicit photos of their own). As if relatively standard modeling photos somehow make Carrie a bad person, but Playboy shots make you a good role model.

Now, I'm not saying either set are right, nor that either set are wrong - that's up to each individual. But, you can't declare Carrie to be bad for her R rated photos when you've got X rated photos of your own.