I fear some of you

[bcp (Premo)]

Originally Posted by Larry Gude

Nope. I am ASSUMING a GOP congress would hold his nuts to the fire, as they did under Clinton. At least that is a track record and it makes sense. Are you assuming if the GOP ever gains real power again it won't do what it did last time?

At this point, are any of us really sure who is pulling the strings, and where the country is headed?
Im not so sure that a republican congress, or a republican president would be doing anything much different right now.

I would just as soon suggest Larry for president as anyone else that is in the headlights for a run right now.

over the last 10 years or so, the government has lost credibility to the point of not trusting a thing they do.

[somdrenter]

Originally Posted by vraiblonde

And my conscience is clear. I did what I could to keep the dictator out of office.

If doing the same thing over and over again, expecting different results clears your conscience; you didn’t have much to clear.

[vraiblonde]

Originally Posted by somdrenter

If doing the same thing over and over again, expecting different results clears your conscience; you didn’t have much to clear.

It's too early for you to be drinking. I'm just sayin...

[EmptyTimCup]

Originally Posted by bcp

heck, obama has me yearning for the Clinton days again.

yeah we could have kept Klinton from feking up the country too bad, by keeping a steady stream of hot young ass in the Oval Office thereby distracting the Philander in Chief

[Nucklesack]

Originally Posted by vraiblonde

You all who refused to vote for McCain last time around, thereby handing Obama the presidency - do you all intend to do that again in 2012 if the Republican candidate is flawed?

Because I'm seriously not interested in another 4 years of this crap. Hell, we're only 10 months into it and I've had enough. But if you all are going to give him another term, I'm not going to concern myself with politics anymore because it will be clear that there's nothing I can do about the direction our country is taking, and therefore shouldn't worry about it.

Well if the Republicans front another RINO, we only have people such as yourself to thank. You know those that were willing to overlook their disdain for RINO's, just to vote a for one Liberal over another Liberal, and the ONLY difference between the two was the party they were affiliated with.

[This_person]

Originally Posted by Nucklesack

Well if the Republicans front another RINO, we only have people such as yourself to thank. You know those that were willing to overlook their disdain for RINO's, just to vote a for one Liberal over another Liberal, and the ONLY difference between the two was the party they were affiliated with.

Yep, they were 100% the same on every other issue. Made the debates really boring, didn't it? They even copied each other's web sites, picked similar running mates, would have had the same cabinets, same foreign policy and military experience.... "the ONLY difference between the two was the party they were affiliated with"




What a moron.

[Nucklesack]

Originally Posted by This_person

Yep, they were 100% the same on every other issue. Made the debates really boring, didn't it? They even copied each other's web sites, picked similar running mates, would have had the same cabinets, same foreign policy and military experience.... "the ONLY difference between the two was the party they were affiliated with"




What a moron.

Tell you what sparky, you outline for us how John McCain stated he was different, and i'll reply with his actual voting record.

But then you must think he was called the maverick for some other reason than voting against Conservatives whenever he had a chance.

[This_person]

Originally Posted by Nucklesack

Tell you what sparky, you outline for us how John McCain stated he was different, and i'll reply with his actual voting record.

But then you must think he was called the maverick for some other reason than voting against Conservatives whenever he had a chance.

He was horrifically liberal for my tastes - but that's not the point.

You said (and, the emphasis was yours) "the ONLY difference between the two was the party they were affiliated with". The inaccuracies of that are outstandingly huge.

[snappy senior]

Originally Posted by Larry Gude

That's right. Given the way Dubbya turned out, we'd have been far better off had Gore won Florida. We'd still have both chambers and, with divided government, as under Clinton, we'd have had the responsible check and balance we desperately lacked from 2001 on.

And don't forget, Larry, WHO kept your sorry a## safe for eight years. We could only wish he was back in the White House. Mistakes, yes, but a man you could trust with YOUR life, true to his promises and dignified the office which made us proud to be Americans. Can you top that?

[remaxrealtor]

Originally Posted by snappy senior

And don't forget, Larry, WHO kept your sorry a## safe for eight years. We could only wish he was back in the White House. Mistakes, yes, but a man you could trust with YOUR life, true to his promises and dignified the office which made us proud to be Americans. Can you top that?