Southern Maryland Online - Serving Calvert, Charles, & St. Mary's Counties.  Click here to go to the Front Page of somd.com.
 
| Write Us | Help | Sponsors | Classifieds | Employment | Forums | MarketPlace | Calendar | Headlines | Announcements | Weather | More... |


Go Back   Southern Maryland Community Forums > General Interest > Politics

Politics Democrat, Republican, Independent.  Liberal or conservative.  We're talking politics here!

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 12-09-2009, 08:36 AM   #1
No Use for Donk Twits
 
cwo_ghwebb's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jul 2005
Location: Costa Rica bound
Posts: 8,712
Washington Emolument

Quote:
Immediately following the announcement, Claudia began to make the case that it was unconstitutional for Obama to accept the prize. Article I of the Constitution provides that "No person holding any office of Profit or Trust… shall, without the consent of Congress, accept any present, Emolument, Office or Title, of any kind whatever, from any King, Prince or Foreign State." The Nobel is a private fund, but the awardees are determined by members of the Norwegian Parliament.

In short, Claudia maintained, the government of Norway is slipping a big check to the President of the United States. Her case is bolstered, I might add, by the clear agenda the bribe is intended to encourage, i.e. the choosing in all instances of policies deemed peaceful, peaceable, peace-oriented and/or peace-inducing by the pacifist international left. Once again, those who admire this country from foreign shores have a truer sense of its founding vision than many of its own meandering children.

NOW HER CALL has found an echo in the person of Tad Armstrong of Edwardsville, Missouri. Mr. Armstrong is an attorney who founded the ELL (Earn it, Learn it, or Lose it) Constitution Clubs. In an op-ed piece in the St. Louis Post-Dispatch this weekend he confirmed the view that Nobel's dynamite is blowing up the Constitution.

He adds a new wrinkle for folks who regard appeals to the Constitution as quaint and anachronistic. He cites a law passed by Congress in 1966, now numbered as Section 7342 of the U.S. Code, which declares that absent specific consent of Congress any gift or decoration received by a sitting President must be accepted on behalf of the United States and turned over to the Treasury.
The American Spectator : Washington Emolument

What are the odds these clowns in Congress are even aware of the law?

What are the odds Obama turns over the money to the Treasury?
__________________
Admittedly, all of the above is a product of my deep-seated and virulent racism. /sarcasm
cwo_ghwebb is offline   [ Reply w/Quote ]
Old 12-09-2009, 08:45 AM   #2
.
 
huntr1's Avatar
 
Member Since: Mar 2003
Posts: 12,824
Quote:
Originally Posted by cwo_ghwebb View Post
The American Spectator : Washington Emolument

What are the odds these clowns in Congress are even aware of the law?

What are the odds Obama turns over the money to the Treasury?
The Redskins have better odds of winning the Superbowl this year than EITHER of your questions.
huntr1 is offline   [ Reply w/Quote ]
Old 12-09-2009, 10:26 AM   #3
Registered User
 
SamSpade's Avatar
 
Member Since: May 2003
Posts: 12,918
The "prize money" disturbs me. As federal workers, we have very clear rules about gifts, such as at Christmas time - and also, gifts to supervisors and from supervisors to those that work for them. And that's to say nothing of taking money from foreign organizations. Heck, we're not even allowed to keep jury duty money.

I can't believe the President can be allowed to pocket the money, although historically - that is exactly what Wilson did (TR donated it to charity, having plenty of his own money).
__________________
“ that which we are, we are;
One equal temper of heroic hearts,
Made weak by time and fate, but strong in will
To strive, to seek, to find, and not to yield.”
(Alfred Tennyson, "Ulysses")
SamSpade is online now   [ Reply w/Quote ]
Old 12-09-2009, 11:39 AM   #4
Main Streeter
 
awpitt's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2002
Location: St. Mary's County
Posts: 8,037
Quote:
Originally Posted by cwo_ghwebb View Post
What are the odds these clowns in Congress are even aware of the law?
Well, the law doesn't apply because Obama is not being awarded by a "any King, Prince or Foreign State". While 5 of the committee members are appointed by theNorwegian Parliament, the Nobel Prize is not awarded by the Norwegian Parliament. Now, if Obama was going to receive a Knighthood from Queen Elizabeth II, that would be a different situation.

Quote:
Originally Posted by cwo_ghwebb View Post
What are the odds Obama turns over the money to the Treasury?
Probably not. He's already said the money is being given to charities.




.
__________________
.
.

.
awpitt is offline   [ Reply w/Quote ]
Old 12-09-2009, 12:25 PM   #5
I eat red meat
 
Animal's Avatar
 
Member Since: Apr 2004
Posts: 906
Quote:
Originally Posted by awpitt View Post
Well, the law doesn't apply because Obama is not being awarded by a "any King, Prince or Foreign State". While 5 of the committee members are appointed by theNorwegian Parliament, the Nobel Prize is not awarded by the Norwegian Parliament. Now, if Obama was going to receive a Knighthood from Queen Elizabeth II, that would be a different situation.


Probably not. He's already said the money is being given to charities.




.
Are you sure the law doesn't apply? The law defines “foreign government” as—
(A) any unit of foreign governmental authority, including any foreign national, State, local, and municipal government;
(B) any international or multinational organization whose membership is composed of any unit of foreign government described in subparagraph (A); and
(C) any agent or representative of any such unit or such organization, while acting as such;

They don't call it the Norwegian Nobel Prize for nothing. The Norwegian Parliamant (the Storting) appoints the members, of which 4 of the five are current members of the Storting, one is the Storting President. To say it isn't a gift from a foreign government would be a stretch.
Animal is offline   [ Reply w/Quote ]
Old 12-09-2009, 01:02 PM   #6
Main Streeter
 
awpitt's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2002
Location: St. Mary's County
Posts: 8,037
Quote:
Originally Posted by Animal View Post
Are you sure the law doesn't apply? The law defines “foreign government” as—
(A) any unit of foreign governmental authority, including any foreign national, State, local, and municipal government;
(B) any international or multinational organization whose membership is composed of any unit of foreign government described in subparagraph (A); and
(C) any agent or representative of any such unit or such organization, while acting as such;

They don't call it the Norwegian Nobel Prize for nothing. The Norwegian Parliamant (the Storting) appoints the members, of which 4 of the five are current members of the Storting, one is the Storting President. To say it isn't a gift from a foreign government would be a stretch.
That would make sence if they were "acting as such" but they're not. As members of the Norwegian Nobel Committee, they're acting under the terms of Alfred Nobel's Will which governs everything about the Nobel prizes. It's not called the "Norwegian Nobel Prize". It's called the Nobel Peace Prize. The Norwegian Nobel Committee was established by Alfred Nobel's Will not the Norwegian Govt. His Will just stipulates that the 5 members be appointed by the Norwegian Parliamant. At first, the committee was made up of members of the Parliamant. That was changed and now members of Parliamant do not sit on the committee, they're just appointed by it.

You will notice that none of the current committee members are members of Parliamant thus the awarding of the Nobel Peace Prize is a function of Alfred Nobel's Will not the Norwegian govt.

http://nobelpeaceprize.org/en_GB/nom...ittee/members/



.
__________________
.
.

.
awpitt is offline   [ Reply w/Quote ]
Old 12-09-2009, 04:24 PM   #7
I eat red meat
 
Animal's Avatar
 
Member Since: Apr 2004
Posts: 906
Quote:
Originally Posted by awpitt View Post
That would make sence if they were "acting as such" but they're not. As members of the Norwegian Nobel Committee, they're acting under the terms of Alfred Nobel's Will which governs everything about the Nobel prizes. It's not called the "Norwegian Nobel Prize". It's called the Nobel Peace Prize. The Norwegian Nobel Committee was established by Alfred Nobel's Will not the Norwegian Govt. His Will just stipulates that the 5 members be appointed by the Norwegian Parliamant. At first, the committee was made up of members of the Parliamant. That was changed and now members of Parliamant do not sit on the committee, they're just appointed by it.
Sure they are acting as the government, why do you think Obama already said he would donate the money to a charity, because he knows he cannot accept it.

Quote:
You will notice that none of the current committee members are members of Parliamant thus the awarding of the Nobel Peace Prize is a function of Alfred Nobel's Will not the Norwegian govt.

http://nobelpeaceprize.org/en_GB/nom...ittee/members/



.
Really, none are current members? How about Jagland, Thorbjørn and Valle, Ågot
Animal is offline   [ Reply w/Quote ]
Old 12-09-2009, 04:46 PM   #8
Pixelated
 
PsyOps's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 2006
Posts: 21,645
Quote:
Originally Posted by SamSpade View Post
I can't believe the President can be allowed to pocket the money, although historically - that is exactly what Wilson did (TR donated it to charity, having plenty of his own money).
That's what I was going to mention is BO will probably donate the money to charity (ACORN or something )
__________________
You get the government you deserve.
PsyOps is offline   [ Reply w/Quote ]
Old 12-09-2009, 04:46 PM   #9
Registered User
 
ImnoMensa's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jul 2007
Posts: 13,780
Quote:
Originally Posted by Animal View Post
Sure they are acting as the government, why do you think Obama already said he would donate the money to a charity, because he knows he cannot accept it.


Really, none are current members? How about Jagland, Thorbjørn and Valle, Ågot
It isnt up to Obama to give the money to Charity. The money belongs to the people of the United States just as any other gift. Bush couldnt give away his gifts either.

Bush Won't Get To Keep The Gifts He Amassed While In Office
ImnoMensa is offline   [ Reply w/Quote ]
Old 12-09-2009, 04:49 PM   #10
Pixelated
 
PsyOps's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 2006
Posts: 21,645
Please tell me since these liberals have taken control that they have had any regard for laws and our constitution. And don't think that, if pressured, this congress wont give him the nod to receive the award.
__________________
You get the government you deserve.
PsyOps is offline   [ Reply w/Quote ]
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:06 PM.

SEO by vBSEO 3.6.0 ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.