Southern Maryland Online - Serving Calvert, Charles, & St. Mary's Counties.  Click here to go to the Front Page of somd.com.
 
| Write Us | Help | Sponsors | Classifieds | Employment | Forums | MarketPlace | Calendar | Headlines | Announcements | Weather | More... |


Go Back   Southern Maryland Community Forums > General Interest > Politics

Politics Democrat, Republican, Independent.  Liberal or conservative.  We're talking politics here!

View Poll Results: Do You Think The Obama Administration is ....
Really that Incompetent - Conservative 0 0%
It was Intentional – Conservative 4 57.14%
Really that Incompetent - Democrat 1 14.29%
It was Intentional – Democrat 0 0%
Really that Incompetent - Democrat 0 0%
It was Intentional – Libertarian / Independent 1 14.29%
Other - Conservative 0 0%
Other - Democrat 0 0%
Other – Libertarian / Independent 1 14.29%
Voters: 7. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 09-21-2011, 08:28 AM   #1
EmptyTimCup
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Gunwalker’s Body Count Grows, Along with the Obama





Quote:
Gunwalker’s Body Count Grows, Along with the Obama Administration’s Cover-Up
It seems like only a matter of time before administration officials face felony indictments for their role in Operation Fast and Furious.

House Oversight and Government Reform Committee Chairman Darrell Issa was brutally frank in a Tuesday morning conference call with new media representatives dedicated to the ongoing Gunwalker scandal.

The California Republican kicked off the call with a brief statement reporting that Marisela Morales, Mexico’s attorney general, now says that at least 200 Mexican deaths can now be traced to weapons from the gunwalking program.That number has been revised significantly upward from earlier unofficial claims of approximately 150 deaths attributed to Operation Fast and Furious guns.

The revelation of the increased body count comes less than 24 hours after the Los Angeles Times published a story that rightly describes the actions of the Obama administration as an unresolved betrayal.

could it really be that sinister ..........


Quote:
I had the unique opportunity to ask Chairman Issa a point-blank question that seems to trouble so many people following this scandal.

After reiterating that every law enforcement agent that has been asked about Operation Fast and Furious has said that there is no way that it could have been a viable law enforcement operation, I asked Chairman Issa if there was any evidence of another reason for the implementation of Operation Fast and Furious and the other alleged gun-walking operations.

“This was dumb, it was useless, and it was lethal,” was the soundbite most of us will take away from the call in answer to that question, but his longer answer — which I regret I do not have a transcript of — is far more telling.

Nothing in his response could be construed to mean that Rep. Issa thought Operation Fast and Furious was a legitimate law enforcement operation. And if it does not appear to have been implemented as a legitimate law enforcement operation, then we are left with the possible alternative that the goal of the operation was both illegitimate and unlawful.

Issa put it rather bluntly: “The administration wanted to show that guns found in Mexico came from the United States.”

He elaborated a bit when he noted that while he wouldn’t presume to know the precise goals of Operation Fast and Furious, it certainly did seem to tie in with the narrative the Obama administration was trying to push — that U.S. guns were turning up at Mexican crime scenes. That allowed, the suggestion hanging in the air was that a goal of the Administration was indeed a “Reichstag fire” designed to support a narrative that has been publicly woven by Attorney General Holder, Secretary of State Clinton, Secretary of Homeland Security Napolitano, and President Obama himself on multiple occasions.

One reason to assert the prominence of U.S. firearms in Mexico would be an attempt to once again bring forth an “assault weapons” ban like the failed 1994 law that sunset in 2004.

Last edited by EmptyTimCup; 09-21-2011 at 08:34 AM.
  [ Reply w/Quote ]
Old 09-21-2011, 09:23 AM   #2
Visualize whirled peas
 
Merlin99's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jul 2006
Location: California, MD
Posts: 8,691
Why does your poll have conservative and democrat instead of republican/democrat or conservative/liberal?, your groupings seem odd.
__________________
‎"I've learned that pleasing everyone is impossible, but pissing everyone off is a piece of cake"
Merlin99 is offline   [ Reply w/Quote ]
Old 09-21-2011, 09:31 AM   #3
EmptyTimCup
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Quote:
Originally Posted by Merlin99 View Post
Why does your poll have conservative and democrat instead of republican/democrat or conservative/liberal?, your groupings seem odd.
you did not vote ..........

yeah true ...

... I guess I do not consider 'republicans' Conservatives with all the Rino's in the part these days ...... but all Democrats are 'Liberals / Socialists / Progressives'



hmm you cannot edit the Poll .......
  [ Reply w/Quote ]
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:52 PM.

SEO by vBSEO 3.6.0 ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.