| |||||||
| Politics Democrat, Republican, Independent. Liberal or conservative. We're talking politics here! |
![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
| | #11 | |
| Pixelated Member Since: Sep 2006
Posts: 21,837
| Quote:
But if any of your dismissal had any validity, the military wouldn’t find it necessary to send out an email to every military person warning them their paychecks are going to be changed. And that’s not even the point… I gave you videos of Obama stating he wasn’t going to touch taxes on the middle class. That turned out to be a lie. Now I know – you being a big Obama supporter – you’re okay with that; you’re okay with the middle class taxes going up; you’re okay with this president lying to us. And, as I tried to point out, Obamacare is also nothing but one big tax on EVERY American, as judged by the SCOTUS. Everyone's taxes are going up despite what this president promised and the ones that do the most for this country, the ones that get paid the least to do so, are going to be impacted all due to politicians that are unable to tell us the truth.
__________________ You get the government you deserve. | |
| | [ Reply w/Quote ] |
| | #12 | ||
| Registered User Member Since: Oct 2008
Posts: 6,870
| Wirelessly posted Quote:
If you want to talk about people breaking promises, what about all those republicans who signed the norquist agreement but ended up voting for this deal that included ending the holiday? | ||
| | [ Reply w/Quote ] |
| | #13 | |
| Registered User Member Since: Nov 2009
Posts: 1,425
| Quote:
In this case, there was a payroll tax deduction agreed to at the end of 2010 that ended up being applicable to the 2011 and 2012 tax deal. Neither party really wanted to extend the payroll tax cut. Rather the parties were fighting over how to reduce the deficit. Obama said his position was to have citizens making over $250,000 pay an increased marginal rate along with minor spending cut. If you want to address the heart of Obama's position it increased tax revenue will make up about half of deficit reduction and that cuts to future spending need not be significant. That is a position I have a problem with. Attacking Obama mercilessly on points such as whether he lied about not letting the tax cuts expire for the middle class is a little bit of nitpicking. For when thing when Obama talked about keeping the tax cuts in place for the middle class it is very likely he was subjectively referring to the Bush tax cuts. | |
| | [ Reply w/Quote ] |
| | #14 | |
| Pixelated Member Since: Sep 2006
Posts: 21,837
| Quote:
Transparency Obamacare and the whole manner in which it was passed “If you like the health care plan you have you can keep it” Obamacare is not a new tax Unemployment will not go above 8% Against gay marriage/for gay marriage Close Gitmo The Patriot Act Cut the deficit in half Get rid of earmarks “You didn’t build that” I don’t think it’s nitpicking to point out the effects of raising taxes (or allowing taxes to go up - if there is really any difference); particularly on our military. Hundreds of thousands will feel the pain. I’m already reading about people feeling the pain of this tax going up. What I find nitpicking is someone like Tilted trying to say when Obama made his promise that taxes wouldn’t go up, the rate on SS was at 6% then lowered later and is now just going back to its original rate. That is the same argument liberals are making about raising taxes back to the Clinton days. Tell that to the thousands of young military folks that joined less than 2 years ago that got used to the 4.2% and now have to suffer sticker shock on the heels of believing Obama wasn’t going to touch their taxes. If they complain, will they be nitpicking? I think many are going to remember “If you make under %250k you wont see a dime of your taxes go up”, regardless of what happened when.
__________________ You get the government you deserve. Last edited by PsyOps; 01-14-2013 at 10:37 AM. | |
| | [ Reply w/Quote ] |
| | #15 | |
| Registered User Member Since: Nov 2009
Posts: 1,425
| Quote:
| |
| | [ Reply w/Quote ] |
| | #16 | |
| Pixelated Member Since: Sep 2006
Posts: 21,837
| Quote:
__________________ You get the government you deserve. | |
| | [ Reply w/Quote ] |
| | #17 | |
| Don't Shoot Member Since: May 2012
Posts: 218
| Quote:
| |
| | [ Reply w/Quote ] |
| | #18 | ||
| #*! boat! Member Since: Jul 2009
Posts: 15,933
| Quote:
__________________ Quote:
| ||
| | [ Reply w/Quote ] |
| | #19 |
| Registered User Member Since: Jun 2010
Posts: 768
| What I find odd about this whole thing is that President Obama lowered the SS tax rate to 4.2%. This put 2% more in your paycheck for the past several years. Now, the rate has expired as deemed by law and gone back to its original form of 6.2%. Everyone is outraged. But I have not heard one person thanking him for the several years of the 2% higher paychecks. Hell, I'm grateful for every penny extra I received during that time of the payroll tax holiday. Had he left the rate alone, this would not even be a thread on the boards. |
| | [ Reply w/Quote ] |
| | #20 | |
| #*! boat! Member Since: Jul 2009
Posts: 15,933
| I'm not outraged; I thought it was an incredibly stupid thing to do to lower the contribution rate on a program that is broke...simply making it more broke more faster. Just to score some political points with his base.
__________________ Quote:
| |
| | [ Reply w/Quote ] |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |