The Child Support Issue.

[RoseRed (Premo)]

Originally Posted by Toxick

Any living man who would allow another man to shoulder the bill for his kids does not deserve his own testicles, and he should be required by law to surrender them to the nearest clinic, where he will be refitted for a non-usable mangina.

Will we find them hangiing off the back of someones pickup truck?

[Toxick]

Originally Posted by RoseRed

Will we find them hangiing off the back of someones pickup truck?

The truck deserves them more.





and they gotta be blue

[RoseRed (Premo)]

Originally Posted by Toxick

The truck deserves them more.





and they gotta be blue

[Dupontster]

Maybe if we all say we'll vote for him, he'll go away...
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
Don't have to just say you will....

Originally Posted by JPC, Sr.

Because it sounds simple while it is not simple at all. The laws are applied wrong and enforced brutally. The system first takes all the parents have and then puts them into jail. Then the deadbroke parents in jail must try to get their families to pay the ransom or stay in jail. It is not simple nor right nor reasonable and it needs to be stopped.

Originally Posted by Tina2001aniT

Jpc,
Do you not have a response for this one??


Edit: I was agreeing with the part to JPC, not Vrai, I am not, I repeat am not a Democrat

No, there is no response to emotional dribble. That he can not understand the political picture is not necessary. Look, if the parent is on disability and the child IS fine which it IS, then there is nothing to be paid. BUT for government officials to talk that nonsense then I would have much to say.

---------------------------

Originally Posted by Ken King

I went through a divorce, I have had to pay child support and alimony while awaiting the absolute divorce, I have first-hand knowledge of the issue and I do not agree with anything you say on the matter.

To begin with, if it was not required by law I would have paid child support anyway, can you say the same? The law just establishes an equitable division of the fiscal responsibility by setting an amount of support based off the differences in the couple's earnings. Parents that do not have the means to pay, as you allege by the term dead broke, are not subjected to requirements beyond their means and they can appeal anything that would be considered beyond reason. It's in the law that way if you bother to read it.

What I believe has happened is that someone, many someones, with deliberate intent made the decision not to make the payments as they are morally and legally bound to make. Our representatives determined that these people must answer to their children, thus this law, to bring their support obligation into order or serve time for their willful disobedience of a legal obligation to provide for their children.

The fact that many families do make it successfully through the child support does not negate the many thousands in Maryland and millions in the USA that are abused by the system. I will stop it.

-----------------------------

Originally Posted by JPC, Sr.

The fact that many families do make it successfully through the child support does not negate the many thousands in Maryland and millions in the USA that are abused by the system. I will stop it.

-----------------------------

How are they abused by the system?

[Ken King (Premo)]

Originally Posted by JPC, Sr.

The fact that many families do make it successfully through the child support does not negate the many thousands in Maryland and millions in the USA that are abused by the system. I will stop it.

-----------------------------

Your eyes must be brown to be so full of sh!t. You won't stop a damn thing even if you do get elected.

The problem is and will be that the deadbeats like you think that once divorced they have no responsibility to the children that they brought into this world and this is exactly why we have the laws in the first place. So tell me exactly how you are going to stop people from being deadbeats, and just banning the word won't do it.

[Tina2001aniT]

Originally Posted by JPC, Sr.

No, there is no response to emotional dribble. That he can not understand the political picture is not necessary. Look, if the parent is on disability and the child IS fine which it IS, then there is nothing to be paid. BUT for government officials to talk that nonsense then I would have much to say.

---------------------------

Who are you to say that child is fine....I feel certain you do not know said child.....Nothing to be paid?? Just because the mother struggles to provide for the child and knows the meaning of responsibility (as in she takes care of said child by all means necessary) the father shouldn't be held responsible?? You are a sick, warped twisted individual.