Democrat Party of SMC.

[BadGirl (Premo)]

Originally Posted by JPC, Sr.

Perhaps so, but I did admit my mistake and I corrected my mistake. I certainly am not perfect but I do care and I always try.

NO you don't. If you lived by this principal, you'd have admitted you are a deadbeat father, and you would have paid money to take care of your child.

Originally Posted by Midnightrider

you really need to do some research on nonviolent civil disobiedence, MLK or Ghandi wouold have never suggested grafitti as an answer, and i think both would feel your refusal to pay your child support to be extremely low and not virtuous :idiot:

I have modernized the method and made it better and it is my own style.

[Midnightrider]

Originally Posted by JPC, Sr.

I have modernized the method and made it better and it is my own style.

you are such a freaking retard that you don't see that your "style" is completely the opposite of ghandi and MLK. Neither of those two would have suggested you abandon your children and leave their mother destitute so you could live your life more comfortably.

And vandalism is not peaceful protest, its destruction of property.

What do you have that is your very own? if i destroyed it to make a point would that fit your definition of "Non violent civil disobediance"?

[FromTexas (Premo)]

Originally Posted by JPC, Sr.

Also I found out this morning that the get-together is being done by Commissioner Raley inviting the Democrat candidates and some supporters and not by the Democrat party of SMC.

So, how many supporters are you taking with you?

Originally Posted by FromTexas

So, how many supporters are you taking with you?

I do not tell on who is talking to me. Others can talk about me and that is fine.

BUT, I did have a nice ad in the Enterprise this past Wednesday so all of the voters in 29b were talked to by me and on election day we will find out the rest and for that we will just have to wait until then.

Originally Posted by BadGirl

NO you don't. If you lived by this principal, you'd have admitted you are a deadbeat father,

I said that I do admit to mistakes but BG is saying to admit to slander and lies and that I do not.

Originally Posted by BadGirl

and you would have paid money to take care of your child.

Child support does not take care of any children because ALL of the children are already taken care of just fine (excluding only violent crime). The child support is just extra money for the custodian so it has nothing to do with caring for the children. It is the law itself that is wrong and needs to be reformed.

Originally Posted by Midnightrider

you are such a freaking retard that you don't see that your "style" is completely the opposite of ghandi and MLK.

It is different and improved but not their opposite. I like my style better.

Originally Posted by Midnightrider

Neither of those two would have suggested you abandon your children and leave their mother destitute so you could live your life more comfortably.

Mnr just made this slander up out of his own immagination and that seems to be the bases of all the child support claims that the separated parent did some thing wrong (which is not true) and therefore it justifies stealing their money (which it does legally but not morally).

Originally Posted by Midnightrider

And vandalism is not peaceful protest, its destruction of property.

I think that there is no peace without justice and so I do not promote only peaceful methods. My actions of civil disobediance were no accidents. People have a right to take up arms against their oppressors.

Originally Posted by Midnightrider

What do you have that is your very own? if i destroyed it to make a point would that fit your definition of "Non violent civil disobediance"?

Personal property and destroying personal property is not some thing that I would do and it is greatly different then destroying the property of a gov that enforces unjust and oppressive laws. I promote only the latter one.

[FromTexas (Premo)]

Originally Posted by JPC, Sr.

I do not tell on who is talking to me. Others can talk about me and that is fine.

BUT, I did have a nice ad in the Enterprise this past Wednesday so all of the voters in 29b were talked to by me and on election day we will find out the rest and for that we will just have to wait until then.

I asked, "How many?" not "Who?"

Originally Posted by FromTexas

I asked, "How many?" not "Who?"

In almost any of my conversations the campaign is talked about at some point, and I have no idea as to who really supports me or who does not and I do not ask. I am quite content to wait for election day and so that is the only answer for how many. We must wait to learn that answer.

Originally Posted by Midnightrider

Its not hurting families, debeats who don't pay their child support IS hurting families.

That just is not true. Consider the dead-broke parents right now locked up in the St. Mary's County Detention Center and the law calling them "deadbeats" when in reality they are "dead-broke" and can not possibly (impossible to) pay the child support demands. Those parents could be with their own children on the 4th of July but our law has parents in jail and therefore the law is dividing the child from their parent just because the parent is poor.

That is hurting families. That is the physical reality, while claiming they owe some arbitrary and capricious child support so the parent can be with their own God given children is an injustice that needs to be stopped. Plus I believe the children have a separate but equal right to be with their other parent that has been forcibly removed by that unjust law.

Originally Posted by Midnightrider

No matter what you might think, your children would have been better off had you paid the court order child support to their mother. As it was, i am sure that they had to do without many things and missed out on many oppertunities b/c their father was such a POS DEADBEAT

There are no children that are doing without because of not recieving their Court ordered child support. They might do without for other reasons but not because of not recieving child support which is just extra money for the custodian. ALL of the children already have ALL of their needs fully already.

It is that untrue opinion in the quote above that slanders both the parent and degrades the child and makes a dishonest person out of the custodial.