Misquoting Jesus

[ItalianScallion (Premo)]

I hope people here realize that all this posting is done for accountability purposes. I can't change everyones mind about Biblical things but I can make them accountable for them. Even with the hardest of heads, accountability comes from hearing & reading. (Romans 10 v 14, 15). So 2A, Starman and others, don't give up because what we do here is not a waste of time. His Word does not return empty.

[2ndAmendment (Premo)]

Originally Posted by ItalianScallion

... His Word does not return empty.

Amen.

[SamSpade]

Originally Posted by 2ndAmendment

Another example of JPC stupidity.

Indeed. Peter refers to Paul's writings as "scripture".

[JPC sr]

Originally Posted by SamSpade

Indeed. Peter refers to Paul's writings as "scripture".

Link to Bible text HERE if you have a reference to that claim.

I think you will find that whenever I quote the Bible then I give a link.

It seems to me that Peter said Paul was hard to understand even though he called Paul's epistles (letters) as scripture, link HERE.

Not I nor the modern scholars say that all of the Bible is a fraud (some do) but there are many parts of the Bible that has hard and easy to see places that are fake or interpolations or just add on texts.

The synoptic problem is so well established since mid 1800's, that it is imposible to intelligently argue against it, link HERE.

It really would be nice for Christianity to come out of the darkness.

[2ndAmendment (Premo)]

Originally Posted by JPC sr

...
It really would be nice for Christianity to come out of the darkness.

Christianity is the narrow gate to the light. Your persistent lies are the broad doorway to darkness.

It would be really nice if you would come out of your stupor.

[JPC sr]

Originally Posted by 2ndAmendment

Christianity is the narrow gate to the light. Your persistent lies are the broad doorway to darkness.

It would be really nice if you would come out of your stupor.

I say that 2A has not-purposely shown a big reason for the confusion,

as many people worship Christianity but then dis-regard the Christ of the Bible.

Because Jesus Christ does not say the same things as does Christianity say.

[JPC sr]

Originally Posted by 2ndAmendment

The presenter in this video fails to mention that each scribes work was meticulously checked by a chief scribe. He says that the scribes made intentional changes. Jewish scribes were forbidden on pain of great penalties from making intentional changes or unintentional errors in their text.

The video on that link refers to the Greek and Aramaic New Testiment and not the Hebrew Old Testiment,

so it was not Jewish scribes but rather the early Roman then Catholic writers that affected the Christian New Testiment.

[worknsing]

You know God give us free will to believe what we choose. The only thing you have to remember is there will be consequences for whichever you choose. Good ones for the right choosers and bad one for the wrong choosers.

For me, even thought I completely believe that the Bible is Gods' Holy Word( you know, if He can create the whole world and humans like you and me, then He surly can put a complet book togther and call it His word) I will er on the side of Heaven. What if you do not believe ( God says you can't add or take aways or the punishment will be severe) and you are wrong when judgement day comes? You won't have a chance to change your mind. I choose to believe and if the end comes and I'm wrong, oh well, nothing lost.

[PsyOps]

Originally Posted by JPC sr

Claiming the Bible is "God's word" is not accurate not Biblically true at all.

The Bible says that Jesus the Christ is the word and not the Bible link HERE John 1:1-14

Claiming the Bible to be God's written word might sound nice but the Bible does not agree.


The apostle Paul said that all scripture is inspired of God link HERE but at that time the Bible was not written.

Therefore the modern Bible scholars now separate from the Bible what is indeed "scripture" and what is not.

Much of the Bible is fake and fraud like Jonah in the belly of a big fish and the last chapter of Mark's gosple which are clearly discovered as untrue.

When we take out the fake parts of the Bible then what is left is scripture indeed.

Yet you use the Bible to substantiate your version of the truth. How odd! The scripture Paul was talking about was the Old Testament. No it wasn’t called the Old Testament then, it was simply called God’s Word or Holy Scripture or Tanakh.

But since you refer to the Bible so much to support your arguments against the Bible, perhaps you could outline which parts of the Bible God revealed to you as false?

[JPC sr]

Originally Posted by PsyOps

But since you refer to the Bible so much to support your arguments against the Bible, perhaps you could outline which parts of the Bible God revealed to you as false?

Well I still like the Bible and I use it for reference often.

It is hard to give details because Christianity has worked so hard to silence the sourses of true scholar Biblical criticism.

I found the hard info in a 1923 book on the subject but now it is hard to find the truth.

Catholic Bible scholarship link HERE.

Old Testiment J, E, P, D, sourse discriptions, link HERE.

There are books in the Bible like Jonah and Esther that are more like children's tales than actual lies, like the three pigs or Robin Hood, ect.

The books are not true but they give a point to children.