A Question For My Evolutionist Friends

[Nucklesack]

Originally Posted by tommyjones

thats his M.O.
keep repeating his misunderstanding until you give up, he has only been doing it for 40 pages now........

41

[Xaquin44]

Originally Posted by tommyjones

it took me longer, and not just on this thread

same here.

I gave up after he droned on about how the killing of native americans wasn't genocide.

[This_person]

Originally Posted by tiny_dancer33

...Yeah, okay. I'm tired of repeating myself at this point. You said you understand what I mean, and then you keep asking me the same thing ("show me the test") because either you really don't get what I'm trying to say, or you just don't know how to respond. I'm not really sure how many more times I can say that I'm not claiming there is a test, and even if there were, my point is not that evolution can be irrefutably proved.

A scientific theory is something that can be tested, researched, discovered, tangibly experimented on or studied, and can be both supported and refuted with scientific claims. Evolutionary theory can be researched and studied through scientific observation, and scienctific research can both support and refute it. (Again, whether or not you agree with those observations is not my point.) A god or the existence of a god cannot be subjected to any of those, especially not a refutal, because the existence of a god is a belief or conviction not subject to observational study. And therefore should not be taught in class where the subject is observational study or experimentation - a science class.

...I'm done here. Your next post will probably just say the same thing anyway. =/

As your posts continue to be the same, lack of understanding of your own claim

[This_person]

Originally Posted by Xaquin44

same here.

I gave up after he droned on about how the killing of native americans wasn't genocide.

gen·o·cide
–noun
the deliberate and systematic extermination of a national, racial, political, or cultural group.


Didn't happen. War against, horrible treatment of, sure. Genocide, not.

[tiny_dancer33]

Originally Posted by This_person

As your posts continue to be the same, lack of understanding of your own claim

Don't ever quote me out context, kay thanks. Let's revisit what I actually said, and this time I'll manifest your penchant for bolding.

A scientific theory is something that can be tested, researched, discovered, tangibly experimented on or studied, and can be both supported and refuted with scientific claims.

You asked me to define a scientific theory and I did. And then I went on to say that evolution falls under those categories, one way or another. And creationism does not fall under any of them. Thank you.

[This_person]

Originally Posted by tiny_dancer33

Don't ever quote me out context, kay thanks. Let's revisit what I actually said, and this time I'll manifest your penchant for bolding.

I included the entire quote, what was out of context?

You asked me to define a scientific theory and I did. And then I went on to say that evolution falls under those categories. And creationism does not fall under any of them. Thank you.

Youi're welcome.

Utilizing your entire quote[indent]A scientific theory is something that can be tested, researched, discovered, tangibly experimented on or studied, and can be both supported and refuted with scientific claims[/quote]What is the method of supporting and/or refuting (scientifically) evolution without tests? What is the difference between tests and experiments, and research? When speaking of scientific discovery or study, what scientific support or refute is there for evolution that ID does not meet similarly (ie, without testing, experimentation)?

Thank you back.

[Xaquin44]

Ignore This person.

no point arguing with the willfully stupid.

[tiny_dancer33]

Originally Posted by Xaquin44

Ignore This person.

no point arguing with the willfully stupid.

Nnnnghh. It's so hard to ignore.

[This_person]

Originally Posted by tiny_dancer33

Nnnnghh. It's so hard to ignore.

OR

You could try answering my question, and/or accepting that human evolution is no more science than ID.

[tommyjones]

Originally Posted by This_person

OR

You could try answering my question, and/or accepting that human evolution is no more science than ID.

bwhahahahahaha


science =/= religion
religion =/= science