An open question to muslims, by Al-Mansur

[This_person]

Originally Posted by OoberBoober

Sorry origin of the species is not my holy book. I don't sift through it to find all the answers to life.

Good for you. I'm sure you just inherently know all the answers.

[This_person]

Originally Posted by OoberBoober

Since when are atheist "against" Christianity?

Are you for it?

Thats like asking how many Christians had read the Koran? Infact I think the common theme is, the more Christians actually read the bible the more they realize it's retarded.

You're not against it, you just think it's retarded. Gotcha

[This_person]

Originally Posted by Nucklesack

Its been documented numerous times, by followers of the Bible, on this board.

I have to admit, we certainly don't know it as well as you do.

You, and only you, know where it says Cain married a sister, or cousin, or something. You, and only you, know where it defines a man's daughter as "not a close relation". You, and only you, know where it says that a man must continue to have sex with his daughter's mother, otherwise it's okay to have sex with his daughter.

No one I know knows the Bible quite like you do.

[VoteJP]

Originally Posted by This_person

I have to admit, we certainly don't know it as well as you do.



No one I know knows the Bible quite like you do.

I feel it must be said that it appears that "Nuckles" was only intending to take a clever but obscure shot at me and at my posting.

Of course I could be mistaken in my interpretation of "Nuckles" intention there, but if we take his posting literally then it is very correct that most Christians do not actually read their own Bibles, and there is widespread evidence of that in the many non-Biblical claims of posters on this Forum.

[This_person]

Originally Posted by VoteJP

I feel it must be said that it appears that "Nuckles" was only intending to take a clever but obscure shot at me and at my posting.

Of course I could be mistaken in my interpretation of "Nuckles" intention there, but if we take his posting literally then it is very correct that most Christians do not actually read their own Bibles, and there is widespread evidence of that in the many non-Biblical claims of posters on this Forum.

For once, you see things close to clearly. Nuck was intending on taking a shot at you, clearly. Also, all Christians.

And, my point was to show he's worse than them.

[VoteJP]

Originally Posted by This_person

And, my point was to show he's worse than them.

When will you ever learn that attacking the messenger instead of addressing the message is the wrong way of communicating or of living.

The reason Jesus was crucified is because people attacked that messenger to silence His message too.

The poster "Nuckles" is not worse than anyone else, even if he gives a different message than you want to face up to.

The very problem of any Orthodoxy is that then no person is allowed to have any individual beliefs or opinions as every one must toot the Orthodox doctrine or the person gets attacked to silence the message.

It does not matter so much if some person is wrong or not, as it matters far more whether we are going to treat each other wrong or not.

[Bronwyn (Premo)]

Originally Posted by foodcritic

Really, is that documented somewhere?

I hate polls and statistics. Not once has anyone called my house to ask me shiat.

[This_person]

Originally Posted by VoteJP

When will you ever learn that attacking the messenger instead of addressing the message is the wrong way of communicating or of living.

I addressed the message. His message was that people are wrong a lot on the Bible. I was agreeing, using him as an example.

[VoteJP]

Originally Posted by VoteJP

All of that is nonsense as Islam is a great religion and that person is NOT "Al-Mansur" and there is nothing evil about Muslims fighting back against any violent aggressor.

Going back to this thread subject - then the answer is given in my post quoted above.

[Nucklesack]

Originally Posted by This_person

I have to admit, we certainly don't know it as well as you do.

You, and only you, know where it says Cain married a sister, or cousin, or something. You, and only you, know where it defines a man's daughter as "not a close relation". You, and only you, know where it says that a man must continue to have sex with his daughter's mother, otherwise it's okay to have sex with his daughter.

No one I know knows the Bible quite like you do.

Hows that Alternative Bible, that identiefies the above, going?