| | #2 (permalink) |
| Drunkard Member Since: Mar 2002 Location: Great Mills
Posts: 330
| Tonio, Not really sure how the process works but don't "stem cells" have to come from a "stem" of some kind? I would guess there's some use they had for the umbilical cord but if that's all it took, wouldn't there be NO debate on the matter? I mean, everyone gets rid of their umbilical cord.
__________________ "Guess what??? I've got a fever...and the only perscription...is more cow bell!!" |
| | [ Reply w/Quote ] |
| | #3 (permalink) |
| Asperger's Poster Child Member Since: Aug 2001
Posts: 7,534
| "Stem" cells don't refer to a physical stem. They're actually the ancestors of blood cells and many other cells. The name refers to their ability to evolve into other types of cells. That's why stem cells are so useful in medicine. 60 Minutes ran a story about a boy who was cured of sickle-cell anemia with a stem cell transplant. He now has a different blood type than when he was born! |
| | [ Reply w/Quote ] |
| | #4 (permalink) |
| Drunkard Member Since: Mar 2002 Location: Great Mills
Posts: 330
| Weird, I didn't really know that.... Yeah all the stuff they can do with it sounds great. Seems like it may be the next step in medical treatment and lead to cures for a lot of prominant illnesses. However, if you can get those types of cells from umbilical cord blood, why is there the debate about using embyros? Or is it just that each "stem cell" must come from a specific body part?
__________________ "Guess what??? I've got a fever...and the only perscription...is more cow bell!!" |
| | [ Reply w/Quote ] |
| | #5 (permalink) |
| Contrarian Member Since: Oct 2001
Posts: 10,210
| The umbilical cord doesn't contain as much material as they can obtain from killing and extracting it from the entire fetus. Simple, albeit brutal, economics. |
| | [ Reply w/Quote ] |
| | #6 (permalink) |
| Drunkard Member Since: Mar 2002 Location: Great Mills
Posts: 330
| Well, I haven't done much research on it, but the ratio of usable cells in the rest of the body compared to the umbilical cord HAS to be about 10,000 to 1 to make it not feasable. RIght now, they are mired in legal battles, moral issues and how many umbilical cords get "tossed" each day? I'd say however many babies are born each day, wouldn't you? (unless people are weird and want to hold on to that stuff). So they must be pretty useless to be pushing for such a controversial alternative. The other thing I wanted to say was that, since abortion is legal at this point, why not allow stem cell extraction from that fetus? I mean, it sounds harsh but it's just getting tossed anyway and it's going to be aborted whether right to lifers want it to or not. You may as well get something good from it. Especially with all the benefits that seem to be possible with this research.
__________________ "Guess what??? I've got a fever...and the only perscription...is more cow bell!!" |
| | [ Reply w/Quote ] |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |
| Home | Help | Contact Us | About somd.com | Privacy | Advertising | Sponsors | Newsletter |
| What's New | What's Cool | Top Rated | Add A Link | Mod a Link | Link to Us |
| Announcements
| Bookstore
| Chat
| Calendar
| Classifieds
| Community
|
| Contests & Surveys
| Culture
| Dating
| Dining
| Education
| Employment
| Entertainment
|
| Forums
| Free E-Mail
| Games
| Gear!
| Government
| Guestbook
| Health
| Marketplace
| Mortgage
| News
|
| Organizations
| Photos
| Postcard
| Real Estate
| Relocation
| Sports
| Survey
| Travel
| Wiki
| Weather
| Worship
|
Brought to you by Virtually Everything, Inc. ©1996-2008, All rights reserved.