| | #102 (permalink) | |
| down south 'jukin Member Since: Sep 2007 Location: Leonardtown
Posts: 30,369
| Quote:
| |
| | [ Reply w/Quote ] |
| | #103 (permalink) |
| Power with Control Member Since: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,896
| Oh, I dont mind spending for speed, but at the rates he charges, and the time he takes, it should be bulletproof, and his ethics unassailable. Sadly, neither is true. Dont let the press from the mags fool you, he goes through car communities fast. The Viper guys use his name as a curse. |
| | [ Reply w/Quote ] |
| | #104 (permalink) | |
| Registered User Member Since: Dec 2007 Location: In confusion
Posts: 1,533
| Quote:
I thought Cameros came standard with a dash rattle .......... you know it is a Goberment Motors Product ..... I remember in the 90's you could get a 5.0 Mustang LX for less than 16 and could not touch a baseline Camero for less than 22? what a joke ...
__________________ Early bird gets the worm, but the second mouse gets the cheese. | |
| | [ Reply w/Quote ] |
| | #105 (permalink) |
| My Sweetest Boy Member Since: Mar 2002
Posts: 40,569
| Camero ![]()
__________________ If you live to be 100, I hope I live to be 100 minus 1 day, so I never have to live without you. - Winnie the Pooh The fate of animals is of greater importance to me than the fear of appearing ridiculous; it is indissolubly connected with the fate of men. - Emile Zola ![]() |
| | [ Reply w/Quote ] |
| | #106 (permalink) |
| Power with Control Member Since: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,896
| Hmmm, for 93, last year of the 5.0, you could indeed get a 5.0 for maybe 14K stripped, but the previous year Z28 didnt cost over 22K. I cant find 92 numbers of the Mustang, nor 1993 numbers for the Camaro, but its close enough that I dont think the numbers changed appreciably. 1993 Mustang 1992 Chevrolet Camaro Specs and Features - MSN Autos The Z28 coupe cost 16K, while the convertible would set you back 21K. |
| | [ Reply w/Quote ] |
| | #107 (permalink) |
| down south 'jukin Member Since: Sep 2007 Location: Leonardtown
Posts: 30,369
| Well, I had a 91 gt that I dearly miss, and yes, at that time, the 5.0's were the best bang for the buck.....I still like them Chevy's, too.... ![]() |
| | [ Reply w/Quote ] |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |
| Home | Help | Contact Us | About somd.com | Privacy | Advertising | Sponsors | Newsletter |
| What's New | What's Cool | Top Rated | Add A Link | Mod a Link | Link to Us |
| Announcements
| Bookstore
| Chat
| Calendar
| Classifieds
| Community
|
| Contests & Surveys
| Culture
| Dating
| Dining
| Education
| Employment
| Entertainment
|
| Forums
| Free E-Mail
| Games
| Gear!
| Government
| Guestbook
| Health
| Marketplace
| Mortgage
| News
|
| Organizations
| Photos
| Postcard
| Real Estate
| Relocation
| Sports
| Survey
| Travel
| Wiki
| Weather
| Worship
|
Brought to you by Virtually Everything, Inc. ©1996-2009, All rights reserved.