| |||||||
| Street Car, Truck, and SUV Maintenance, detailing, tuning, audio systems, and hot rodding... Import and domestic. Post a pic and show off your wheels. |
![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
| | #21 |
| Gen Univ Roleplaying Sys Member Since: Nov 2012
Posts: 4,662
| I like Stacy - the show was much better before MTV cut him for those 2 dweebs I loved me some Trucks and HP TV ..... sadly that is gone now |
| | [ Reply w/Quote ] |
| | #22 | |
| #*! boat! Member Since: Jul 2009
Posts: 15,939
| Engine all assembled..finishing up the mounting of the second alternator where the AC compressor was originally. On board welder setup...of course.
__________________ Quote:
| |
| | [ Reply w/Quote ] |
| | #23 |
| Registered User Member Since: Jun 2003 Location: Dunkirk
Posts: 1,073
| My next project... And looking for a small block Ford motor to power it.
__________________ No Tea for Me, Thanks. I Prefer Progress. |
| | [ Reply w/Quote ] |
| | #24 | |
| #*! boat! Member Since: Jul 2009
Posts: 15,939
| A favorite of mine too. I've been offered a couple that were really rough...but the project plate is a mite too full right now. I'm just now puttting the final touches on an older 302 build...one that is strictly a high-performance motor, to go in a 16' Donzi. I have others lying around...what direction were you planning to go with the engine for the F1?
__________________ Quote:
| |
| | [ Reply w/Quote ] |
| | #25 |
| Gen Univ Roleplaying Sys Member Since: Nov 2012
Posts: 4,662
| Pre 55 ........ nice [if you don't know in 1955 Ford went to the 'dogleg' windshield] a 302 / 351 would be cheaper .... personally I like the Classic FE Engines Y Blocks - 292, 312 ... 332. 352. 390 ... |
| | [ Reply w/Quote ] |
| | #26 | |
| Registered User Member Since: Jun 2003 Location: Dunkirk
Posts: 1,073
| Quote:
__________________ No Tea for Me, Thanks. I Prefer Progress. | |
| | [ Reply w/Quote ] |
| | #27 |
| Registered User Member Since: Jun 2003 Location: Dunkirk
Posts: 1,073
| It's actually a 1954 F-100.
__________________ No Tea for Me, Thanks. I Prefer Progress. |
| | [ Reply w/Quote ] |
| | #28 | ||
| #*! boat! Member Since: Jul 2009
Posts: 15,939
| Quote:
The C-4 can be made to withstand a lot but you would be far better off with a C-6. The C-6 with an R6 servo upgrade and the HD (truck or Lincoln) 5-disk clutch will withstand well over 500 ft-lbs of torque..
__________________ Quote:
| ||
| | [ Reply w/Quote ] |
| | #29 |
| Registered User Member Since: Jun 2003 Location: Dunkirk
Posts: 1,073
| Well that's good news. I thought since it was the 2V and not the 4V it might not be as ready for hp increases. I'll need to see if this is a good engine, (I'm told it may have frozen and cracked a few years ago.) If it's good, what would it take (cost) to make a reliable 400 hp engine out of it? I know that can depend on a lot of things but is there a ballpark figure you can offer?
__________________ No Tea for Me, Thanks. I Prefer Progress. |
| | [ Reply w/Quote ] |
| | #30 | ||
| #*! boat! Member Since: Jul 2009
Posts: 15,939
| Quote:
That said, for something as heavy as that pickup, I'd be focused more on a high torque output, peaking around 4000 or even less. Might end up with "only" 330-350 HP but hat would move that beast better than a high HP engine that scrificed low-end torque to get bigger HP numbers. You butt-dyno would like the torquey engine better. I've managed to get there for less...but had a good foundation to work with.
__________________ Quote:
Last edited by Gilligan; 02-05-2013 at 12:07 PM. | ||
| | [ Reply w/Quote ] |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |