ACLU sues to include prayer on public property??

Dymphna

Loyalty, Friendship, Love
Couple Sues Over Inscription Omission

SEATTLE - A couple who purchased an inscribed brick for a state park playground are suing because the words "Thank you Jesus" were not included as they had wished.

Residents had organized an effort to build a playground this spring at Saint Edward State Park, located on the northeastern shore of Lake Washington.

Money for the project was raised in part by the sale of inscribed bricks to be displayed there for $100. Dan and Olga Buchanan ordered one with the message: "Thank you Jesus, Daria & Evan Buchanan."

But when they saw their brick in the playground's walkway, it read only, "Daria & Evan Buchanan."

On Wednesday, the American Center for Law and Justice filed a lawsuit in U.S. District Court on behalf of the Buchanans. ACLJ lawyer Stuart J. Roth said the omission violates his clients' free-speech rights.

"The law is very clear: If a state permits a wide variety of messages to be posted in a public area, the state cannot reject a message because it contains a religious reference," Roth said.

The group had offered the couple their money back. Colleen Ponto, who lead the volunteer effort, did not return calls.

Virginia Painter, a spokeswoman for the state Parks and Recreation Commission, said Thursday that the volunteers were trying to respect the constitutional separation of church and state.
*********************************

Make up your mind already.
 

Frank

Chairman of the Board
You should get a look at David Limbaugh's book. Or check out Ann Coulter's latest column, which excerpts from it. I can understand the concept that government should never be the agent of promoting or favoring a religion, but this smacks of persecuting the free exercise of religion.
 

Dymphna

Loyalty, Friendship, Love
Originally posted by Frank
You should get a look at David Limbaugh's book. Or check out Ann Coulter's latest column, which excerpts from it. I can understand the concept that government should never be the agent of promoting or favoring a religion, but this smacks of persecuting the free exercise of religion.

I know, but the P&R people thought they were doing the right thing and avoiding exactly this type of lawsuit.
 
Top