Question for Justicematters??????

57Chevy

Black Widow
Dan: why were you telling Grand jury witness's that Mrs Cook never recieved her settlement check,before they testified at the Grand Jury?????
 

Themis

New Member
JusticeMatters (DAN) can you address this question please?

Dan, is this the felon drug convict you were referring to.
Dan: why did Richard Fritz, and you(Daniel White) offer Terry Clarke a 30 day sentence to lie about John Mattingly when Clarke was facing 70 years in prison for his crimes?
Why did you send Clarke's lawyer a letter saying you were going to back out of your deal after Mattingly was cleared?

Clarke's lawyer filed court papers this week stating that his client Terry Clarke fully cooperated witt assistant State's Attorney Daniel J. White, and State's Attorney Richard D. Fritz.
Clarke entered a plea agreement early last year on misdemeanor assault and weapons offenses, from charging papers alleging he fired a rifle across a pond at people who had been bird hunting.He said the state's division of parole and probation has recommended that Clarke be sentenced to 30 days in jail, although its guidelines range from five to 35 years.

Tell us about the deal Richard Fritz, and you (Daniel White) made with career criminal Francis( Bubba) Scriber to testify against Mattingly. I hear it was a doozy Dan.Hypocrite!

You can tell us now, or you can tell a Judge later
 

57Chevy

Black Widow
Dan: why were you telling Grand jury witness's that Mrs Cook never recieved her settlement check,before they testified at the Grand Jury?????

Dan you never answered the queation about Mrs. Cook

You had a Copy of Mrs. Cooke's settlement check the whole time

By the time one of the family members of Albert Cook was paid $20,000 and expenses went to attorney Robert Moreland, of $350.00.
[B $478,450.00[/b] was paid to Susan Cook by the Progressive Insurance Company.
John Mattingly got one third of the money as his fee for his representation.
Susan Cook got $305,109.49 after a few other expenses were removed by Mattingly.
The date of the check from the insurance company which was made out to John Mattingly and Cook was May 29, 2008.

White leaked Grand Jury Testimony to Rossignol in the Mattingly case just like Walter Dorsey said that Richard Fritz did in 1998.

Why weren't you at the trial Dan?
Charges brought against John A. Mattingly by Saint Mary's States Attorney Richard Fritz were thrown out by a Jury.
No "victim" had filed any complaint or charges against Mattlngjy or Brown. All charges were initiated by the State's Attorney's Office..
The so-called "victims" admitted their stories had changed after being coached by Assistant State's Attorney Daniel J. White. White had made three visits to the victims, coaching their testimony prior to giving a statement.
Numerous witnesses stated that White had threatened them in an effort to influence- their testimony.I
n its case. After a one and a half year "investigation," costing the taxpayers untold hundreds of thousands of dollars, the prosecutor could not call a single cop to the stand. In fact, Mattingly had to subpoena the cops.
As a result of Mattingly's trial subpoena of the Sheriff's Office, the week before trial, magically a covert file was found.Two business days before trial, a report was uncovered which corroborated Mattingly's version of events. This report was taken by Det. Ray (who presumably because of his honesty in reporting the "first" story by the so-called "victims" was promptly removed from the case). Det. Ray's report reported the initial contact with "victim" Shirley Gilliam."
[Det. Ray was accompanied by Assistant State's Attorney Daniel J.White. Interestingly, Ray's report not only corroborated Mattingly's version of events, but further listed the Complainant as "Assistant State's Attorney Daniel J. White." This report was over one year old.
It should be particularly noted that Mattingly challenged the State to produce more police reports as early as March of this year. In response to the direct inquiry by Hon. Sean D. Wallace, in open court, as to whether the State had more police
reports, White stated that he had given them all to Mattingly ("actually twice your Honor"). This, of course, was a lie. White had
failed to give many reports. More importantly, White was present when the critical interview was taken by Det. Ray. White lied and buried the report.
You weren't at the trial because they found your file proving you had the witness's change their testimony. to suit your charges.
 

Themis

New Member
Dorsey Blasts Fritz Over Failing To Account For Drug Funds, Lying About Gambling


COMPTON (October 1998) --- St. Mary’s States Attorney Walter B. Dorsey accused Richard Fritz, his former deputy who is running as a Republican to succeed him, with maliciously and falsely attacking his political enemies while serving as deputy states attorney as well as failing to account for thousands of dollars in drug funds administered by Fritz in 1992. Dorsey also called Fritz’s attempt to convince citizens that would be a tough antidrug prosecutor a "masquerade" and he promised to "unmask" Fritz .
Walter Dorsey;

Dorsey said;
"The Office of States Attorney of St. Mary’s County is very important and it should not be used as a way to attack political enemies or to attack anyone and hold them up to public ridicule. One cannot talk about what took place in a Grand Jury room if an indictment is not forthcoming, in order to protect the Grand Jury process. The same is true if an investigation does not yield an indictment or criminal charges."
Dorsey;
" I am going to say some things tonight that I could not before," warned Dorsey. "You may remember some articles in the paper a few years ago, they surfaced because Richard Fritz misrepresented to the local press that he had evidence that Sheriff Wayne Pettit and Commissioner Eddie Bailey were gambling with drug dealers and prostitutes in an illegal gambling hall."
"Fritz later told me he knew nothing about it when the articles were published," said Dorsey. "I met with the officials of the Maryland State Police and they reported to me that they had no evidence of Bailey and Pettit playing cards or being in the Cinderblock Building."
"The only evidence that Fritz had was a drug dealer named Gary Lee Stanley, whom he gave $4,000 in drug fund money to probably play cards with," said Dorsey. "Fritz misrepresented to the press that these public officials were gambling in there, he used this office to embarrass Pettit and Bailey for political purposes because he supported their opponents."
Dorsey said that Fritz knew that the state police reported to him that they had not been able to collaborate the information from the drug dealer after they sent an undercover investigator in to gamble at the Cinderblock Building. When Fritz then turned around and gave out information about the gambling investigation, which the state police say did not produce any incriminating evidence against the two officials, Dorsey equated that act with revealing Grand Jury testimony.Following the publication of several articles about the alleged presence of the sheriff and the county commissioner in the Cinderblock Building the two filed a $1.5 million libel suit against the newspaper. Prior to publication of the articles, Pettit and Bailey failed to comment on the allegations when asked for comment, an act that contributed to their plight.
After a year and a half of legal proceedings, the newspaper proved it’s reliance upon Fritz, as a public official, as the source of information on Pettit and Bailey being in the building. Fritz gave a affidavit certifying he supplied information about the sheriff and commissioner frequenting the gambling hall to the newspaper. Upon discovering that fact, the two plaintiffs were forced to drop their suit as the newspaper had every right to report to it’s readers the information it relied upon from Fritz, as deputy states attorney, to be accurate and true, and therefore, did not act in a malicious manner.
Fritz Lied To Newspaper, and Public Dorsey said after the speech last Thursday that he felt Fritz’s misuse of prosecutorial powers was outrageous, in that he apparently deliberately misled the newspaper about the truth concerning Bailey and Pettit; that not only did the former prosecutor lie and hurt them, but he also lied to everyone in St. Mary’s County.
"We have just seen this vividly demonstrated that when the president admitted that he lied to the nation when he spoke on television in January, that when a public official lies to a newspaper about a material fact, that he is lying to the entire community as well when that information is published and relied upon by the publisher and the readers to be true," said Dorsey.
"A public official, which is what Fritz was when he was a member of my office," said Dorsey, "has to tell the public the truth, and in this matter he did not. He thrived on manipulating, lying and misleading and therefore, by having the newspaper, Pettit and Bailey all fighting each other, he was able to stand aside with amusement at the results of his political manipulations with ST. MARY’S TODAY taking the sheriff and the commissioner to task for being in the gambling hall when they actually were not."
Dorsey said that when he confronted Fritz about the information contained in the articles; that Fritz denied having contacted the state police about the alleged activities in the Cinderblock Building and the alleged presence of the sheriff and the commissioner.
Dorsey said that Fritz claimed the state police probe at the Cinderblock Building began as an offshoot of a gambling operation in Charlotte Hall.
That operation was later halted after state police conducted a raid and made several arrests.
When Dorsey went back to the state police about the matter, they gave him a copy of the letter Fritz had sent them as an official request for an investigation, after having it typed by his wife who works in the prosecutor’s office, requesting the state police investigate the presence of the two officials in the gambling hall which formerly was located next to the Sign of the Whale Liquors in Lexington Park.
Dorsey said when he confronted Fritz about lying to him that there were also other issues taking place at the same time which led to Fritz walking out, quitting his job with no notice or regard for the several drug cases he was handling and returning to the practice of law which has led him to become the principal attorney for all of the local drug dealers.Fritz ran for election as states attorney in 1994, a race he lost in the Democratic Primary and is running once again this year, but now as a newly minted Republican.

Fritz Repeatedly Failed To Give Accounting For Drug FundFritz was also accused by Dorsey on Thursday of failing to ever account for thousands of dollars that passed through a drug fund over which the deputy prosecutor had control.
"We had a drug fund that was not audited by the county, but was administered by Fritz," said Dorsey. "He would not account for the money. I told him to give an accounting of the money and instead, he quit."
"I repeatedly asked Fritz for a proper accounting of the money, thousands of dollars, and he never provided any such accounting," explained Dorsey in an interview after the rally. "He would direct that checks be issued to him and not to any specific person. No record was ever furnished as to what then happened to the money. $3,200 in supposedly ‘flash money’ which is never spent and always returned has never been accounted for."
Fritz, at the time, responded to the warning of the state police that they would not trust him with secret information, by saying he would drop cases in which they failed to give him prior information."Fritz has masqueraded as being tough on drugs long enough and it is time to unmask him," said Dorsey. "He is the attorney for all the drug dealers in the county. He portrays himself as if he is the opponent of drug dealers, but the facts prove otherwise."
"In the last few years that he was my deputy and in charge of the narcotics division, there were 302 drug distribution cases, serious cases, and there could reasons to drop a few cases, but not the 201 cases that Fritz personally dropped," pointed out Dorsey about Fritz’s record.
"But now that Fritz is campaigning, he has the audacity to say he will fight the drug dealers," said Dorsey at the meeting.
Later, the chief prosecutor stated bluntly; "Fritz has lied repeatedly about these matters. His record as a prosecutor was certainly not what he portrayed to the public and now he makes a very good living off the drug dealers, many of whom, pay their attorney fees in the same cash they make from those who are addicted to and use illegal narcotics --- the very same cash generated from the two-thirds of crime, chiefly burglaries of homes and businesses."
Richard Fritz did not return a call requesting comment on Dorsey’s charges prior to press deadline.


Themis

One of the best thing people will say about John Mattingly is "he's no quitter". He stands up to bullies, and fights them off.
John Mattingly is the right man! At the right time for Saint Mary's County!

Crime Down 36% ?
Someone needs to tell the people of Lexington Park, especially along the Great Mills Rd Corridor that Crime is down.
That area of the County is so crime ridden that WAWA closed their store there because of the numerous Robberies, Drug Deals, and Assaults that occurred on their property. They closed the store because they feared for the safety of their employees.
WAWA is a huge chain operation that has been in business for 46 years. WAWA has closed smaller stores in inner city locations, closed old stores, and replaced them with newer larger stores.
Lexington Park, MD has the distinction of being the only location in the WAWA chain of more than 500 full size stores with gas stations that has been forced to close because of a crime problem.

Rick Fritz-"Happens All The Time"

We need a State's Attorney who will make sure that repeat offenders are punished, and not pampered just to get them through the system.
Richard Fritz puts drug dealers back on our streets and they're killing our children
[/QUOTE]
 

57Chevy

Black Widow
Dan you never answered the queation about Mrs. Cook

You had a Copy of Mrs. Cooke's settlement check the whole time

By the time one of the family members of Albert Cook was paid $20,000 and expenses went to attorney Robert Moreland, of $350.00.
[B $478,450.00[/b] was paid to Susan Cook by the Progressive Insurance Company.
John Mattingly got one third of the money as his fee for his representation.
Susan Cook got $305,109.49 after a few other expenses were removed by Mattingly.
The date of the check from the insurance company which was made out to John Mattingly and Cook was May 29, 2008.

White leaked Grand Jury Testimony to Rossignol in the Mattingly case just like Walter Dorsey said that Richard Fritz did in 1998.

Why weren't you at the trial Dan?
Charges brought against John A. Mattingly by Saint Mary's States Attorney Richard Fritz were thrown out by a Jury.
No "victim" had filed any complaint or charges against Mattlngjy or Brown. All charges were initiated by the State's Attorney's Office..
The so-called "victims" admitted their stories had changed after being coached by Assistant State's Attorney Daniel J. White. White had made three visits to the victims, coaching their testimony prior to giving a statement.
Numerous witnesses stated that White had threatened them in an effort to influence- their testimony.I
n its case. After a one and a half year "investigation," costing the taxpayers untold hundreds of thousands of dollars, the prosecutor could not call a single cop to the stand. In fact, Mattingly had to subpoena the cops.
As a result of Mattingly's trial subpoena of the Sheriff's Office, the week before trial, magically a covert file was found.Two business days before trial, a report was uncovered which corroborated Mattingly's version of events. This report was taken by Det. Ray (who presumably because of his honesty in reporting the "first" story by the so-called "victims" was promptly removed from the case). Det. Ray's report reported the initial contact with "victim" Shirley Gilliam."
[Det. Ray was accompanied by Assistant State's Attorney Daniel J.White. Interestingly, Ray's report not only corroborated Mattingly's version of events, but further listed the Complainant as "Assistant State's Attorney Daniel J. White." This report was over one year old.
It should be particularly noted that Mattingly challenged the State to produce more police reports as early as March of this year. In response to the direct inquiry by Hon. Sean D. Wallace, in open court, as to whether the State had more police
reports, White stated that he had given them all to Mattingly ("actually twice your Honor"). This, of course, was a lie. White had
failed to give many reports. More importantly, White was present when the critical interview was taken by Det. Ray. White lied and buried the report.
You weren't at the trial because they found your file proving you had the witness's change their testimony. to suit your charges.

Mr White, I have to say that you are guilty of Witness Tampering, Pejury,
Filing False Criminal Charges, Bribery, and numerous violations of the US Constitution. You corruptly used your power, and the Grand Jury to frame an innocent man. Maybe they can come up with a few hundred charges against you.
We'll talk about your brother in a few days.
 

Themis

New Member
Dan you never answered the queation about Mrs. Cook

You had a Copy of Mrs. Cooke's settlement check the whole time

By the time one of the family members of Albert Cook was paid $20,000 and expenses went to attorney Robert Moreland, of $350.00.
[B $478,450.00[/b] was paid to Susan Cook by the Progressive Insurance Company.
John Mattingly got one third of the money as his fee for his representation.
Susan Cook got $305,109.49 after a few other expenses were removed by Mattingly.
The date of the check from the insurance company which was made out to John Mattingly and Cook was May 29, 2008.

White leaked Grand Jury Testimony to Rossignol in the Mattingly case just like Walter Dorsey said that Richard Fritz did in 1998.

Why weren't you at the trial Dan?
Charges brought against John A. Mattingly by Saint Mary's States Attorney Richard Fritz were thrown out by a Jury.
No "victim" had filed any complaint or charges against Mattlngjy or Brown. All charges were initiated by the State's Attorney's Office..
The so-called "victims" admitted their stories had changed after being coached by Assistant State's Attorney Daniel J. White. White had made three visits to the victims, coaching their testimony prior to giving a statement.
Numerous witnesses stated that White had threatened them in an effort to influence- their testimony.I
n its case. After a one and a half year "investigation," costing the taxpayers untold hundreds of thousands of dollars, the prosecutor could not call a single cop to the stand. In fact, Mattingly had to subpoena the cops.
As a result of Mattingly's trial subpoena of the Sheriff's Office, the week before trial, magically a covert file was found.Two business days before trial, a report was uncovered which corroborated Mattingly's version of events. This report was taken by Det. Ray (who presumably because of his honesty in reporting the "first" story by the so-called "victims" was promptly removed from the case). Det. Ray's report reported the initial contact with "victim" Shirley Gilliam."
[Det. Ray was accompanied by Assistant State's Attorney Daniel J.White. Interestingly, Ray's report not only corroborated Mattingly's version of events, but further listed the Complainant as "Assistant State's Attorney Daniel J. White." This report was over one year old.
It should be particularly noted that Mattingly challenged the State to produce more police reports as early as March of this year. In response to the direct inquiry by Hon. Sean D. Wallace, in open court, as to whether the State had more police
reports, White stated that he had given them all to Mattingly ("actually twice your Honor"). This, of course, was a lie. White had
failed to give many reports. More importantly, White was present when the critical interview was taken by Det. Ray. White lied and buried the report.
You weren't at the trial because they found your file proving you had the witness's change their testimony. to suit your charges.

:coffee:
 

57Chevy

Black Widow
Dan: why were you telling Grand jury witness's that Mrs Cook never recieved her settlement check,before they testified at the Grand Jury?????

Dan you never answered the queation about Mrs. Cook

You had a Copy of Mrs. Cooke's settlement check the whole time

By the time one of the family members of Albert Cook was paid $20,000 and expenses went to attorney Robert Moreland, of $350.00.
[B $478,450.00[/b] was paid to Susan Cook by the Progressive Insurance Company.
John Mattingly got one third of the money as his fee for his representation.
Susan Cook got $305,109.49 after a few other expenses were removed by Mattingly.
The date of the check from the insurance company which was made out to John Mattingly and Cook was May 29, 2008.

White leaked Grand Jury Testimony to Rossignol in the Mattingly case just like Walter Dorsey said that Richard Fritz did in 1998.

Why weren't you at the trial Dan?
Charges brought against John A. Mattingly by Saint Mary's States Attorney Richard Fritz were thrown out by a Jury.
No "victim" had filed any complaint or charges against Mattlngjy or Brown. All charges were initiated by the State's Attorney's Office..
The so-called "victims" admitted their stories had changed after being coached by Assistant State's Attorney Daniel J. White. White had made three visits to the victims, coaching their testimony prior to giving a statement.
Numerous witnesses stated that White had threatened them in an effort to influence- their testimony.I
n its case. After a one and a half year "investigation," costing the taxpayers untold hundreds of thousands of dollars, the prosecutor could not call a single cop to the stand. In fact, Mattingly had to subpoena the cops.
As a result of Mattingly's trial subpoena of the Sheriff's Office, the week before trial, magically a covert file was found.Two business days before trial, a report was uncovered which corroborated Mattingly's version of events. This report was taken by Det. Ray (who presumably because of his honesty in reporting the "first" story by the so-called "victims" was promptly removed from the case). Det. Ray's report reported the initial contact with "victim" Shirley Gilliam."
[Det. Ray was accompanied by Assistant State's Attorney Daniel J.White. Interestingly, Ray's report not only corroborated Mattingly's version of events, but further listed the Complainant as "Assistant State's Attorney Daniel J. White." This report was over one year old.
It should be particularly noted that Mattingly challenged the State to produce more police reports as early as March of this year. In response to the direct inquiry by Hon. Sean D. Wallace, in open court, as to whether the State had more police
reports, White stated that he had given them all to Mattingly ("actually twice your Honor"). This, of course, was a lie. White had
failed to give many reports. More importantly, White was present when the critical interview was taken by Det. Ray. White lied and buried the report.

You weren't at the trial because they found your file proving you had the witness's change their testimony. to suit your charges.
When St. Mary's Assistant State's Attorney Daniel White visited Thompson last year about her transaction with Mattingly and Brown, she testified. "He said they wronged us by taking the land".

Not one person ever complained about their transaction with Mattingly until you lied to them and told them that their land had been stolen.
 

tigerbug

New Member
Name you witness or hold your lies . Stop making up lies - the judge said it all when he sent Danny boy, the village idiot, to the pen. corrupt - cheat - Mattingly remember ?
 

County_Boy

New Member
The Enterprise
Friday, Oct. 22, 2010

By JOHN WHARTON
Staff writer

Brown sentenced to term in prison

Judge says state's attorney candidate John Mattingly
also tried to cheat people in real-estate dealings

A two-year investigation of real-estate fraud and witness tampering
resulted this week in a prison sentence for Daniel Jason Brown,
and a judge's rebuke of state's attorney candidate John Mattingly

"I frankly don't think you were the instigator in any of these things,
but you played a major role," Judge Wallace said, and he barred Brown
from having any contact with John Mattingly after Brown is
released from custody and begins five years of supervised probation.

"The two of you together (Mattingly & Brown) did operate your business corruptly,"
Judge Wallace said, "in an effort to cheat other people."


Renee Joy, assistant Prince George's prosecutor, spoke of Brown's conduct.
"His work ethic was proven to be shortcuts and scamming innocent people
to line his own pockets," Joy said. "He thinks that he's above the law."

In the home-improvement case, Joy said, "Mr. Brown was showing the
epitome of greed. He was taking advantage of an elderly woman who was
an amputee and had recently lost her husband."

for full story click on link below
Brown sentenced to term in prison
 

57Chevy

Black Widow
Are you waiting for your own trial to answer this?

Dan: why were you telling Grand jury witness's that Mrs Cook never recieved her settlement check,before they testified at the Grand Jury?????

JusticeMatters (DAN) can you address this question please?

Dan you never answered the queation about Mrs. Cook

You had a Copy of Mrs. Cooke's settlement check the whole time

By the time one of the family members of Albert Cook was paid $20,000 and expenses went to attorney Robert Moreland, of $350.00.
[B $478,450.00[/b] was paid to Susan Cook by the Progressive Insurance Company.
John Mattingly got one third of the money as his fee for his representation.
Susan Cook got $305,109.49 after a few other expenses were removed by Mattingly.
The date of the check from the insurance company which was made out to John Mattingly and Cook was May 29, 2008.

White leaked Grand Jury Testimony to Rossignol in the Mattingly case just like Walter Dorsey said that Richard Fritz did in 1998.

Why weren't you at the trial Dan?
Charges brought against John A. Mattingly by Saint Mary's States Attorney Richard Fritz were thrown out by a Jury.
No "victim" had filed any complaint or charges against Mattlngjy or Brown. All charges were initiated by the State's Attorney's Office..
The so-called "victims" admitted their stories had changed after being coached by Assistant State's Attorney Daniel J. White. White had made three visits to the victims, coaching their testimony prior to giving a statement.
Numerous witnesses stated that White had threatened them in an effort to influence- their testimony.I
n its case. After a one and a half year "investigation," costing the taxpayers untold hundreds of thousands of dollars, the prosecutor could not call a single cop to the stand. In fact, Mattingly had to subpoena the cops.
As a result of Mattingly's trial subpoena of the Sheriff's Office, the week before trial, magically a covert file was found.Two business days before trial, a report was uncovered which corroborated Mattingly's version of events. This report was taken by Det. Ray (who presumably because of his honesty in reporting the "first" story by the so-called "victims" was promptly removed from the case). Det. Ray's report reported the initial contact with "victim" Shirley Gilliam."
[Det. Ray was accompanied by Assistant State's Attorney Daniel J.White. Interestingly, Ray's report not only corroborated Mattingly's version of events, but further listed the Complainant as "Assistant State's Attorney Daniel J. White." This report was over one year old.
It should be particularly noted that Mattingly challenged the State to produce more police reports as early as March of this year. In response to the direct inquiry by Hon. Sean D. Wallace, in open court, as to whether the State had more police
reports, White stated that he had given them all to Mattingly ("actually twice your Honor"). This, of course, was a lie. White had
failed to give many reports. More importantly, White was present when the critical interview was taken by Det. Ray. White lied and buried the report.

You weren't at the trial because they found your file proving you had the witness's change their testimony. to suit your charges.
When St. Mary's Assistant State's Attorney Daniel White visited Thompson last year about her transaction with Mattingly and Brown, she testified. "He said they wronged us by taking the land".

Not one person ever complained about their transaction with Mattingly until you lied to them and told them that their land had been stolen.

tigerbugis starting to sound like a worried crooked cop, or defense attorney who thinks he's a "D. A". I'd tell him to hold his lips if bugs had lips.

I would think that because White told so many lies he probably told all the Grand Jury Witness's this lie. White probably had a list of lies to tell them written on the back of the copy of the settlement check given to Mrs cook that White got from Mattingly!

Hows Mikey doing Dan?
 
Top